The impact of a professional development MOOC on the teaching beliefs of University Science Laboratory Teachers

IF 2.2 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
N. Brouwer, G. Fleerackers, I. Maciejowska, Claire McDonnell, M. Mocerino
{"title":"The impact of a professional development MOOC on the teaching beliefs of University Science Laboratory Teachers","authors":"N. Brouwer, G. Fleerackers, I. Maciejowska, Claire McDonnell, M. Mocerino","doi":"10.1515/cti-2022-0030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study contributes to the understanding of online professional development of university STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) lecturers. An active learning massive open online course (MOOC) to develop best practice in teaching in university science laboratories was developed using the ADDIE (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, Evaluation) model in three cycles. The teaching beliefs and intentions of the participants were determined before and after they completed the MOOC and their level of satisfaction with this professional development opportunity was examined using a survey. The results showed high completion rates and an appreciation of the online course design. Participants who completed the course evaluation were satisfied and they identified the usefulness of the active learning components that required them to discuss and reflect, develop plans and peer-assess. A large majority developed new ideas to help them to improve their teaching. The participation in the course increased participants’ understanding of the multidimensional aspects of laboratory teaching and the challenges related to it. The majority of participants changed their teaching beliefs to become more student-centred.","PeriodicalId":93272,"journal":{"name":"Chemistry Teacher International : best practices in chemistry education","volume":"4 1","pages":"355 - 376"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemistry Teacher International : best practices in chemistry education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cti-2022-0030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract This study contributes to the understanding of online professional development of university STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) lecturers. An active learning massive open online course (MOOC) to develop best practice in teaching in university science laboratories was developed using the ADDIE (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, Evaluation) model in three cycles. The teaching beliefs and intentions of the participants were determined before and after they completed the MOOC and their level of satisfaction with this professional development opportunity was examined using a survey. The results showed high completion rates and an appreciation of the online course design. Participants who completed the course evaluation were satisfied and they identified the usefulness of the active learning components that required them to discuss and reflect, develop plans and peer-assess. A large majority developed new ideas to help them to improve their teaching. The participation in the course increased participants’ understanding of the multidimensional aspects of laboratory teaching and the challenges related to it. The majority of participants changed their teaching beliefs to become more student-centred.
专业发展慕课对大学科学实验室教师教学信念的影响
摘要本研究有助于理解大学STEM(科学、技术、工程和数学)讲师的在线专业发展。利用ADDIE(分析、设计、开发、实施、评估)模型,分三个周期开发了一门积极学习的大规模开放在线课程(MOOC),以开发大学科学实验室的最佳教学实践。参与者的教学信念和意图是在他们完成慕课前后确定的,他们对这一专业发展机会的满意度是通过调查来检验的。结果显示完成率很高,并对在线课程设计表示赞赏。完成课程评估的参与者感到满意,他们确定了主动学习部分的有用性,这些部分要求他们进行讨论和反思、制定计划和同行评估。绝大多数人都提出了新的想法来帮助他们改进教学。课程的参与增加了参与者对实验室教学的多层面以及与之相关的挑战的理解。大多数参与者改变了他们的教学信念,变得更加以学生为中心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信