A comparative study between topical versus combined (systemic plus topical) therapy in ciprofloxacin-sensitive chronic suppurative otitis media (tubotympanic)

IF 0.2 Q4 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Sandip M. Parmar, S. Chauhan, S. Mittal, M. Chaudhary
{"title":"A comparative study between topical versus combined (systemic plus topical) therapy in ciprofloxacin-sensitive chronic suppurative otitis media (tubotympanic)","authors":"Sandip M. Parmar, S. Chauhan, S. Mittal, M. Chaudhary","doi":"10.4103/indianjotol.indianjotol_21_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM) is defined as a chronic inflammation of the middle ear and mastoid cavity, which presents with recurrent ear discharge or otorrhea through a tympanic perforation. Aim: The study aimed to compare the effectiveness of topical versus combined (systemic and topical) therapy in ciprofloxacin-sensitive CSOM (tubotympanic). Materials and Methods: A hospital-based prospective study of 100 patients aged >18 years with clinically diagnosed CSOM (tubotympanic type) was conducted. After aural toilet, patients were randomly assigned to one of the two treatment groups: Group A (topical ciprofloxacin ear drops) Group B (topical plus oral ciprofloxacin). These patients were received 1 week of treatment and followed up on day 3 and day 7. Statistical comparisons were performed using Chi-square test. Results: In this study, maximum numbers of patients were found in the age group of 20–29 years. Patients in Group A (topical ciprofloxacin ear drops) showed less side effects in comparison to Group B (topical plus oral ciprofloxacin). Forty-one (82%) patients showed improvement in Group A, whereas 43 (86%) patients in Group B. Conclusion: Topical ciprofloxacin drops were as effective as combined (oral plus topical ciprofloxacin) and that the addition of oral drug did not have any beneficial effect adding only to the side effects and to the cost of treatment.","PeriodicalId":44304,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Otology","volume":"28 1","pages":"288 - 291"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Otology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/indianjotol.indianjotol_21_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM) is defined as a chronic inflammation of the middle ear and mastoid cavity, which presents with recurrent ear discharge or otorrhea through a tympanic perforation. Aim: The study aimed to compare the effectiveness of topical versus combined (systemic and topical) therapy in ciprofloxacin-sensitive CSOM (tubotympanic). Materials and Methods: A hospital-based prospective study of 100 patients aged >18 years with clinically diagnosed CSOM (tubotympanic type) was conducted. After aural toilet, patients were randomly assigned to one of the two treatment groups: Group A (topical ciprofloxacin ear drops) Group B (topical plus oral ciprofloxacin). These patients were received 1 week of treatment and followed up on day 3 and day 7. Statistical comparisons were performed using Chi-square test. Results: In this study, maximum numbers of patients were found in the age group of 20–29 years. Patients in Group A (topical ciprofloxacin ear drops) showed less side effects in comparison to Group B (topical plus oral ciprofloxacin). Forty-one (82%) patients showed improvement in Group A, whereas 43 (86%) patients in Group B. Conclusion: Topical ciprofloxacin drops were as effective as combined (oral plus topical ciprofloxacin) and that the addition of oral drug did not have any beneficial effect adding only to the side effects and to the cost of treatment.
局部与全身联合治疗环丙沙星敏感慢性化脓性中耳炎(结核性)的比较研究
慢性化脓性中耳炎(Chronic化脓性中耳炎,CSOM)是一种中耳及乳突腔的慢性炎症,表现为反复耳液或耳漏经鼓室穿孔。目的:本研究旨在比较局部与联合(全身和局部)治疗环丙沙星敏感CSOM(输卵管炎)的有效性。材料与方法:对100例临床诊断为CSOM(管鼓型)的年龄在bb0 ~ 18岁的患者进行了一项基于医院的前瞻性研究。经耳如厕后,患者随机分为两组:A组(外用环丙沙星滴耳液)B组(外用环丙沙星加口服)。治疗1周,第3天、第7天随访。统计学比较采用卡方检验。结果:本研究中以20-29岁年龄组患者最多。与B组(局部加口服环丙沙星)相比,A组(局部加口服环丙沙星)患者的副作用更小。结论:局部使用环丙沙星滴剂与联合使用环丙沙星滴剂(口服+局部使用环丙沙星)效果相同,口服药物的使用除了增加副作用和增加治疗费用外,没有任何有益效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Otology
Indian Journal of Otology OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信