Subimperialism and Perpetual Necropower: Foundational Violence and Mnemonic Self-killing on Jeju Island, 1947–Present

IF 2.6 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Veda Hyunjin Kim
{"title":"Subimperialism and Perpetual Necropower: Foundational Violence and Mnemonic Self-killing on Jeju Island, 1947–Present","authors":"Veda Hyunjin Kim","doi":"10.1080/14623528.2022.2050146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Centering on a case of genocide that occurred on Jeju Island, 1947–onward, and the resulting memory politics that unfolded alongside the Jeju Truth and Reconciliation (TR) process in the 2000s, this article provides a novel critique of state-sanctioned reparatory processes in response to state violence. Adopting and revising the subimperialism framework, I challenge the prevalent teleological grammar in representing South Korean history. Rather than assuming a remedial function of the TR, I approach the TR as an epitome of subimperial and necropolitical interplay of power. Subimperialism is primary and perpetual, based upon foundational violence and is concomitant with perpetual death, physical and spiritual in form. I show, drawing from Mbembe, the perpetual operations of necropower (i.e. the destruction of the other’s humanity and simultaneous construction of the imperial selfhood), killing the other physically in 1947–1954 and then killing the other in themselves in collective memory in the 2000s. In the first body section, I delineate how foundational the Jeju Genocide was for South Korean subimperialism. I illustrate the way in which necropolitical self-making (of “South” Korean peoplehood) sustained concatenated developments of disciplinary, biopolitical, and sovereign power. The right-wing faction’s necropolitics was the centerpiece of the formation of “South” Korean peoplehood, preceding the state’s exercise of the aforementioned forms of power. In the second body section, I show how the necropower was embodied by genocide survivors committing mnemonic self-killing in rendering their own history. Under the perpetual necropower, many of the survivors refrained from archiving their own history, despite the Jeju TR programme intended to include the Jeju Islanders’ voice. Moreover, even those testifying for the TR reproduced a formulaic anticommunist taxonomy (“communist anti-nationals” versus “anticommunist patriots”) that has long excruciated the Jeju Islanders themselves.","PeriodicalId":46849,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Genocide Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"133 - 156"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Genocide Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14623528.2022.2050146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Centering on a case of genocide that occurred on Jeju Island, 1947–onward, and the resulting memory politics that unfolded alongside the Jeju Truth and Reconciliation (TR) process in the 2000s, this article provides a novel critique of state-sanctioned reparatory processes in response to state violence. Adopting and revising the subimperialism framework, I challenge the prevalent teleological grammar in representing South Korean history. Rather than assuming a remedial function of the TR, I approach the TR as an epitome of subimperial and necropolitical interplay of power. Subimperialism is primary and perpetual, based upon foundational violence and is concomitant with perpetual death, physical and spiritual in form. I show, drawing from Mbembe, the perpetual operations of necropower (i.e. the destruction of the other’s humanity and simultaneous construction of the imperial selfhood), killing the other physically in 1947–1954 and then killing the other in themselves in collective memory in the 2000s. In the first body section, I delineate how foundational the Jeju Genocide was for South Korean subimperialism. I illustrate the way in which necropolitical self-making (of “South” Korean peoplehood) sustained concatenated developments of disciplinary, biopolitical, and sovereign power. The right-wing faction’s necropolitics was the centerpiece of the formation of “South” Korean peoplehood, preceding the state’s exercise of the aforementioned forms of power. In the second body section, I show how the necropower was embodied by genocide survivors committing mnemonic self-killing in rendering their own history. Under the perpetual necropower, many of the survivors refrained from archiving their own history, despite the Jeju TR programme intended to include the Jeju Islanders’ voice. Moreover, even those testifying for the TR reproduced a formulaic anticommunist taxonomy (“communist anti-nationals” versus “anticommunist patriots”) that has long excruciated the Jeju Islanders themselves.
颠覆帝国主义与永远的死亡:1947年至今济州岛上的基础暴力和记忆自残
本文以1947年以来发生在济州岛的一起种族灭绝案件为中心,以及2000年代与济州岛真相与和解(TR)进程一起展开的记忆政治为中心,对国家批准的应对国家暴力的赔偿过程进行了新颖的批判。本文采用并修正了次帝国主义框架,对韩国历史的普遍目的论语法提出了挑战。我没有假设TR具有补救功能,而是将TR视为次帝国和死亡政治权力相互作用的缩影。次帝国主义是主要的和永久的,以基本的暴力为基础,伴随着肉体和精神形式的永久死亡。从Mbembe的作品中,我展示了死亡权力(necropower)的永久运作(即毁灭他人的人性,同时构建帝国的自我),在1947年至1954年在身体上杀死他人,然后在2000年的集体记忆中杀死自己。在正文的第一部分,我描述了济州岛大屠杀对韩国次帝国主义的基础。我阐释了(“南朝鲜”民族的)死亡政治自我创造维持纪律、生命政治和主权权力的连续发展的方式。右翼派系的亡灵政治是“南朝鲜”民族形成的核心,在国家行使上述权力形式之前。在第二部分中,我将展示种族灭绝幸存者在呈现他们自己的历史时如何通过记忆性的自我杀戮来体现necropower。在永久的亡灵势力下,许多幸存者不愿将自己的历史存档,尽管济州岛TR计划打算包括济州岛居民的声音。此外,即使是那些为法庭作证的人也重复了一种公式化的反共分类(“共产主义反国民”与“反共爱国者”),这种分类长期以来一直折磨着济州岛居民自己。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Genocide Research
Journal of Genocide Research POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信