Bilateral Co-authorship Indicators Based on Fractional Counting

R. Rousseau, Lin Zhang
{"title":"Bilateral Co-authorship Indicators Based on Fractional Counting","authors":"R. Rousseau, Lin Zhang","doi":"10.2478/jdis-2021-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Purpose In this contribution we provide two new co-authorship indicators based on fractional counting. Design/methodology/approach Based on the idea of fractional counting we reflect on what should be an acceptable indicator for co-authorship between two entities. From this reflection we propose an indicator, the co-authorship score, denoted as cs, using the harmonic mean. Dividing this new indicator by the classical co-authorship indicator based on full counting, leads to a co-authorship intensity indicator. Findings We show that the indicators we propose have many necessary or at least highly desirable properties for a proper cs-score. It is pointed out that the two new indicators can be used for countries, but also for institutions and other pairs of entities. A small example shows the feasibility of the co-authorship score and the co-authorship intensity indicator. Research limitations The indicators are not yet tested in real cases. Practical implications As the notions of co-authorship and collaboration have many aspects, we think that our contribution may help policy management to take yet another aspect into account as part of a multi-faceted description of research outcomes. Originality/value The indicators we propose cover yet another aspect of co-authorship.","PeriodicalId":92237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of data and information science (Warsaw, Poland)","volume":"6 1","pages":"1 - 12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of data and information science (Warsaw, Poland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2021-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Purpose In this contribution we provide two new co-authorship indicators based on fractional counting. Design/methodology/approach Based on the idea of fractional counting we reflect on what should be an acceptable indicator for co-authorship between two entities. From this reflection we propose an indicator, the co-authorship score, denoted as cs, using the harmonic mean. Dividing this new indicator by the classical co-authorship indicator based on full counting, leads to a co-authorship intensity indicator. Findings We show that the indicators we propose have many necessary or at least highly desirable properties for a proper cs-score. It is pointed out that the two new indicators can be used for countries, but also for institutions and other pairs of entities. A small example shows the feasibility of the co-authorship score and the co-authorship intensity indicator. Research limitations The indicators are not yet tested in real cases. Practical implications As the notions of co-authorship and collaboration have many aspects, we think that our contribution may help policy management to take yet another aspect into account as part of a multi-faceted description of research outcomes. Originality/value The indicators we propose cover yet another aspect of co-authorship.
基于分数计数的双边合作作者指标
摘要目的在这篇文章中,我们提供了两个基于分数计数的新的合著指标。设计/方法论/方法基于分数计数的思想,我们思考了两个实体之间合作的可接受指标。根据这一反映,我们提出了一个指标,即使用调和平均值的合著者得分,表示为cs。将这一新指标除以基于完全计数的经典合作指标,得出合作强度指标。研究结果我们表明,我们提出的指标具有许多必要的或至少非常理想的性质,以获得适当的cs分数。有人指出,这两个新指标既可用于国家,也可用于机构和其他实体。一个小例子展示了合作作者得分和合作作者强度指标的可行性。研究局限性这些指标尚未在实际案例中进行测试。实际意义由于合著和合作的概念有很多方面,我们认为我们的贡献可能有助于政策管理将另一个方面作为研究成果多方面描述的一部分。原创性/价值我们提出的指标涵盖了合作的另一个方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信