Seismic Performance of Special Truss Moment Frames With X-Bracing Type: Influence of Building Height

IF 1.1 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Hidajat Sugihardjo, A. B. Habieb, Robi Karuniawan
{"title":"Seismic Performance of Special Truss Moment Frames With X-Bracing Type: Influence of Building Height","authors":"Hidajat Sugihardjo, A. B. Habieb, Robi Karuniawan","doi":"10.2478/cee-2022-0058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study investigated the implementation of Special Truss Moment Frames (STMF) X-braced type in accordance with the recommendations of the National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP), 1997:2000 and Indonesian National Standards (SNI) 1726 where it is stated that the STMF may only be used up to a maximum building height of 48 m (160 feet) for Seismic Design Category of D. The analyses compared the seismic response of apartment buildings using STMF system with different height: 44 m (11 stories), 48 m (12 stories), and 52 m (13 stories). The nonlinear behaviors were investigated through a series of nonlinear time history and pushover analyses, including the inelastic response of the structural components, top-roof displacement, drift ratio, and ductility. The structural modeling and the selection of steel sections were performed in SAP 2000 based on SNI 1726 code, considering that the structure was built on medium soil in Aceh region. Seismic performance was examined through a series of pushover and nonlinear time history analysis (NLTHA) using three scaled accelerogram: Elcentro 1940, Northridge 1994 and Kobe 1995 records. The results of the study show that in case of STMF structure with the height of 52 m (higher than the maximum height of STMF structure stated in the codes), the seismic performance of the structure was excellent and met the requirements. Axial plasticization occurred only in X-braces, not followed by the formation of plastic hinges at the ends of the ductile segments. Meanwhile, the other structural components remained elastic. This indicates that the structure can still be used after the earthquake, by replacing only the X-braced components. The drift ratio met the requirements and the roof displacements behavior was asymptotic, indicating that there is no residual horizontal displacement of the building after the seismic loads occurred.","PeriodicalId":42034,"journal":{"name":"Civil and Environmental Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Civil and Environmental Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/cee-2022-0058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This study investigated the implementation of Special Truss Moment Frames (STMF) X-braced type in accordance with the recommendations of the National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP), 1997:2000 and Indonesian National Standards (SNI) 1726 where it is stated that the STMF may only be used up to a maximum building height of 48 m (160 feet) for Seismic Design Category of D. The analyses compared the seismic response of apartment buildings using STMF system with different height: 44 m (11 stories), 48 m (12 stories), and 52 m (13 stories). The nonlinear behaviors were investigated through a series of nonlinear time history and pushover analyses, including the inelastic response of the structural components, top-roof displacement, drift ratio, and ductility. The structural modeling and the selection of steel sections were performed in SAP 2000 based on SNI 1726 code, considering that the structure was built on medium soil in Aceh region. Seismic performance was examined through a series of pushover and nonlinear time history analysis (NLTHA) using three scaled accelerogram: Elcentro 1940, Northridge 1994 and Kobe 1995 records. The results of the study show that in case of STMF structure with the height of 52 m (higher than the maximum height of STMF structure stated in the codes), the seismic performance of the structure was excellent and met the requirements. Axial plasticization occurred only in X-braces, not followed by the formation of plastic hinges at the ends of the ductile segments. Meanwhile, the other structural components remained elastic. This indicates that the structure can still be used after the earthquake, by replacing only the X-braced components. The drift ratio met the requirements and the roof displacements behavior was asymptotic, indicating that there is no residual horizontal displacement of the building after the seismic loads occurred.
x支撑型特殊桁架弯矩框架抗震性能:建筑高度的影响
摘要本研究根据国家地震灾害减少计划(NEHRP)1997:2000和印度尼西亚国家标准(SNI)1726的建议,调查了特殊特拉斯力矩框架(STMF)X支撑型的实施情况,其中指出,STMF只能用于D类抗震设计的最大建筑高度为48 m(160英尺)。分析比较了不同高度(44米(11层)、48米(12层)和52米(13层))使用STMF系统的公寓楼的地震反应。通过一系列非线性时程和pushover分析,研究了结构的非线性行为,包括结构构件的非弹性响应、顶部位移、滑移率和延性。结构建模和钢型材的选择是在SAP 2000中根据SNI 1726代码进行的,考虑到该结构是在亚齐地区的中等土壤上建造的。地震性能通过一系列推挤和非线性时程分析(NLTHA)进行了检查,使用三个比例的加速度图:Elcentro 1940、Northridge 1994和Kobe 1995记录。研究结果表明,当STMF结构高度为52m(高于规范中STMF结构的最大高度)时,该结构的抗震性能良好,满足要求。轴向塑化仅发生在X形支架中,随后在韧性节段的末端没有形成塑性铰链。同时,其他结构部件保持弹性。这表明该结构在地震后仍然可以使用,只需更换X支撑构件。漂移率满足要求,屋顶位移行为是渐进的,表明在地震荷载作用下,建筑物没有残余水平位移。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
58.30%
发文量
69
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信