A meta-analysis of microbial contaminants in selected ready-to-eat foods in Bayelsa State, Nigeria: Public Health implications and risk-reduction strategies

Sylvester Chibueze Izah , Ebitimitula Nicholas Etebu , Tamaraukepreye Catherine Odubo , Ayobami Omozemoje Aigberua , Ikiemoye Iniamagha
{"title":"A meta-analysis of microbial contaminants in selected ready-to-eat foods in Bayelsa State, Nigeria: Public Health implications and risk-reduction strategies","authors":"Sylvester Chibueze Izah ,&nbsp;Ebitimitula Nicholas Etebu ,&nbsp;Tamaraukepreye Catherine Odubo ,&nbsp;Ayobami Omozemoje Aigberua ,&nbsp;Ikiemoye Iniamagha","doi":"10.1016/j.heha.2022.100017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Food poisoning is a major public health concern. This study employs a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarise and parameterise microbial densities and isolates in ready-to-eat-foods in Bayelsa State, Nigeria. A random effect meta-analysis model is used to compare the microbial density of these foods across the various locations and occurrence rate of the commonly isolated microbes. Whereas meta-analysis results for total heterotrophic bacteria range from 3.65–6.58 Log CFU/g with a <em>p =</em> 0.01 measure of heterogeneity, I<sup>2</sup> =61% and overall effect being insignificantly different (<em>p =</em> 0.73), total fungi range from 3.10–4.03 Log CFU/g with a <em>p =</em> 0.92 measure of heterogeneity, I<sup>2</sup> =0% and overall effect being significantly different (<em>p =</em> 0.0001). The measure of heterogeneity for the microbial diversity is <em>p =</em> 0.22, I<sup>2</sup> =24% and overall effect is insignificant (<em>p =</em> 0.51). 22 microbial genera are isolated and <em>Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli</em> and <em>Aspergillus</em> species depict the highest occurrence rate of 90.48 - 100%, 82.08–88.57% and 57.14- 100% respectively. The availability of these microbial diversities suggests a possible risk of food-borne diseases, hence, the need [i] to enlighten the preparers, vendors and consumers of ready-to-eat foods on the health threats posed by microorganisms found in the foods, [ii] for surveillance of ready-to-eat foods in the study area by appropriate regulatory agencies, and [iii] for vendors to improve on their storage and packaging materials as well as make provision for sources of heat in show glasses in order to retain the freshness of cooked food over prolonged periods.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73269,"journal":{"name":"Hygiene and environmental health advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773049222000174/pdfft?md5=86394d4fb4e823b29b284479abbff041&pid=1-s2.0-S2773049222000174-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hygiene and environmental health advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773049222000174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Food poisoning is a major public health concern. This study employs a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarise and parameterise microbial densities and isolates in ready-to-eat-foods in Bayelsa State, Nigeria. A random effect meta-analysis model is used to compare the microbial density of these foods across the various locations and occurrence rate of the commonly isolated microbes. Whereas meta-analysis results for total heterotrophic bacteria range from 3.65–6.58 Log CFU/g with a p = 0.01 measure of heterogeneity, I2 =61% and overall effect being insignificantly different (p = 0.73), total fungi range from 3.10–4.03 Log CFU/g with a p = 0.92 measure of heterogeneity, I2 =0% and overall effect being significantly different (p = 0.0001). The measure of heterogeneity for the microbial diversity is p = 0.22, I2 =24% and overall effect is insignificant (p = 0.51). 22 microbial genera are isolated and Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli and Aspergillus species depict the highest occurrence rate of 90.48 - 100%, 82.08–88.57% and 57.14- 100% respectively. The availability of these microbial diversities suggests a possible risk of food-borne diseases, hence, the need [i] to enlighten the preparers, vendors and consumers of ready-to-eat foods on the health threats posed by microorganisms found in the foods, [ii] for surveillance of ready-to-eat foods in the study area by appropriate regulatory agencies, and [iii] for vendors to improve on their storage and packaging materials as well as make provision for sources of heat in show glasses in order to retain the freshness of cooked food over prolonged periods.

尼日利亚巴耶尔萨州选定即食食品中微生物污染物的荟萃分析:公共卫生影响和减少风险战略
食物中毒是一个重大的公共卫生问题。本研究采用系统综述和荟萃分析,总结和参数化尼日利亚巴耶尔萨州即食食品中的微生物密度和分离物。随机效应荟萃分析模型用于比较这些食物在不同地点的微生物密度和常见分离微生物的发生率。总体异养菌的meta分析结果为3.65-6.58 Log CFU/g,异质性p = 0.01, I2 =61%,总体效应差异不显著(p = 0.73);总体真菌的meta分析结果为3.10-4.03 Log CFU/g,异质性p = 0.92, I2 =0%,总体效应差异显著(p = 0.0001)。微生物多样性异质性测量值为p = 0.22, I2 =24%,总体效应不显著(p = 0.51)。共分离出22个微生物属,其中金黄色葡萄球菌、大肠杆菌和曲霉菌的感染率最高,分别为90.48 - 100%、82.08-88.57%和57.14- 100%。这些微生物多样性的存在表明可能存在食源性疾病的风险,因此,需要[i]使即食食品的制备者、供应商和消费者了解食品中发现的微生物对健康构成的威胁,[ii]由适当的监管机构对研究地区的即食食品进行监测。[iii]供应商改进其储存和包装材料,并在展示杯中提供热源,以便长时间保持熟食的新鲜度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hygiene and environmental health advances
Hygiene and environmental health advances Environmental Science (General)
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
38 days
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信