The degree of spuriousness within the job satisfaction-organizational citizenship behavior relationship

IF 2.3 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Michael King, Nathan A. Bowling, Kevin J. Eschleman
{"title":"The degree of spuriousness within the job satisfaction-organizational citizenship behavior relationship","authors":"Michael King,&nbsp;Nathan A. Bowling,&nbsp;Kevin J. Eschleman","doi":"10.1002/jts5.84","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Overwhelming evidence suggests that job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) are positively related. Although researchers have generally assumed that satisfaction has a genuine relationship with OCB, we argue that the satisfaction–OCB relationship may be largely spurious. We tested the degree of spuriousness within the satisfaction–OCB relationship in two studies—a meta-analysis (Study 1) and a two-wave primary study (<i>N</i> = 420; Study 2). In both studies, we examined the strength of the satisfaction–OCB relationship after controlling for environmental variables (i.e., job characteristics, job stressors, and leader behaviors) and personality variables (i.e., five factor model characteristics and core self-evaluations). Across the two studies, we observed several instances in which the satisfaction–OCB relationship was significantly weaker after we controlled for a third variable, but a meaningful relationship was still present. And in some instances, the satisfaction–OCB relationship was rendered statistically nonsignificant or practically nonsignificant once controls were included. These findings suggest that satisfaction and OCB is at least partially spurious.</p>","PeriodicalId":36271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology","volume":"5 3","pages":"162-182"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/jts5.84","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jts5.84","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Overwhelming evidence suggests that job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) are positively related. Although researchers have generally assumed that satisfaction has a genuine relationship with OCB, we argue that the satisfaction–OCB relationship may be largely spurious. We tested the degree of spuriousness within the satisfaction–OCB relationship in two studies—a meta-analysis (Study 1) and a two-wave primary study (N = 420; Study 2). In both studies, we examined the strength of the satisfaction–OCB relationship after controlling for environmental variables (i.e., job characteristics, job stressors, and leader behaviors) and personality variables (i.e., five factor model characteristics and core self-evaluations). Across the two studies, we observed several instances in which the satisfaction–OCB relationship was significantly weaker after we controlled for a third variable, but a meaningful relationship was still present. And in some instances, the satisfaction–OCB relationship was rendered statistically nonsignificant or practically nonsignificant once controls were included. These findings suggest that satisfaction and OCB is at least partially spurious.

工作满意度-组织公民行为关系中的虚假程度
大量证据表明,工作满意度与组织公民行为(OCB)呈正相关。尽管研究人员普遍认为满意度与组织公民行为之间存在着真实的关系,但我们认为满意度与组织公民行为之间的关系可能在很大程度上是虚假的。我们在两项研究中测试了满意度-组织行为行为关系中的虚假程度——一项荟萃分析(研究1)和一项两波初级研究(N = 420;研究2)在两项研究中,我们在控制了环境变量(即工作特征、工作压力源和领导行为)和人格变量(即五因素模型特征和核心自我评价)后,检验了满意度与组织公民行为关系的强度。在这两项研究中,我们观察到几个例子,在我们控制了第三个变量后,满意度-组织公民行为的关系显着减弱,但仍然存在有意义的关系。在某些情况下,一旦包括控制,满意度-组织公民行为关系在统计上不显著或实际上不显著。这些发现表明,满意度和组织公民行为至少部分是虚假的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology
Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology Psychology-Social Psychology
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信