Intravenous Port Catheter Implantation: Retrospective Study in Single Center Experience

Q4 Medicine
M. Manici, K. Darcin, A. Isguzar, Sami Kaan Coşarcan, Baris Kucukerdem, O. Erçelen
{"title":"Intravenous Port Catheter Implantation: Retrospective Study in Single Center Experience","authors":"M. Manici, K. Darcin, A. Isguzar, Sami Kaan Coşarcan, Baris Kucukerdem, O. Erçelen","doi":"10.54875/jarss.2022.18894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Totally implantable venous access ports (TIVAPs) are widely preferred for oncology patients who need chemotherapy. Although peripheral cannula or catheter in a large vein may help chemotherapy treatment; some complications such as vascular irritation, thrombosis may interrupt the treatment. To avoid this interruption, TIVAPs are usually preferred. The aim of the study was to evaluate device related complications and safety with anesthesia team implanted TIVAPs. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted on patients who underwent procedure for implantation of TIVAPs in our hospital between the dates of January 2017 - December 2020. The demographic data, vascular access side, complications seen related to TIVAPs insertion procedure, the number of removed catheters, reasons of removal of catheters were recorded. Results: During this study period 700 TIVAPs procedure have been performed in our clinic. While 646 patients (92.3%) had right sided TIVAPs, 678 patients (96.8%) had TIVAPs inserted to subclavian vein. When the most common cancer seen in this patient group was colorectal cancer, hepatobiliary tract cancer group came second. Total number of removed catheters for some reasons was 107 which is 15.2% of all patients. When the causes for catheter removal were examined, it was discovered that although systemic infection was the most common reason (47 patients, or 6.7%), the number of patients with positive culture from the port was extremely rare (19 patients) (2.71%). Conclusion: We think that when TIVAPs are inserted under ultrasound guidance and fluoroscopy control in the operating room, the incidence of complications will be relatively low. Especially in cancer patients, TIVAPs can be inserted and used safely with high patient comfort. Keywords: Totally implantable venous access port systems, complications, patient safety, port infection","PeriodicalId":36000,"journal":{"name":"Anestezi Dergisi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anestezi Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54875/jarss.2022.18894","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Totally implantable venous access ports (TIVAPs) are widely preferred for oncology patients who need chemotherapy. Although peripheral cannula or catheter in a large vein may help chemotherapy treatment; some complications such as vascular irritation, thrombosis may interrupt the treatment. To avoid this interruption, TIVAPs are usually preferred. The aim of the study was to evaluate device related complications and safety with anesthesia team implanted TIVAPs. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted on patients who underwent procedure for implantation of TIVAPs in our hospital between the dates of January 2017 - December 2020. The demographic data, vascular access side, complications seen related to TIVAPs insertion procedure, the number of removed catheters, reasons of removal of catheters were recorded. Results: During this study period 700 TIVAPs procedure have been performed in our clinic. While 646 patients (92.3%) had right sided TIVAPs, 678 patients (96.8%) had TIVAPs inserted to subclavian vein. When the most common cancer seen in this patient group was colorectal cancer, hepatobiliary tract cancer group came second. Total number of removed catheters for some reasons was 107 which is 15.2% of all patients. When the causes for catheter removal were examined, it was discovered that although systemic infection was the most common reason (47 patients, or 6.7%), the number of patients with positive culture from the port was extremely rare (19 patients) (2.71%). Conclusion: We think that when TIVAPs are inserted under ultrasound guidance and fluoroscopy control in the operating room, the incidence of complications will be relatively low. Especially in cancer patients, TIVAPs can be inserted and used safely with high patient comfort. Keywords: Totally implantable venous access port systems, complications, patient safety, port infection
静脉端口置管:单中心经验回顾性研究
目的:全植入式静脉通道(TIVAPs)广泛应用于肿瘤化疗患者。虽然外周大静脉插管或导管可能有助于化疗;一些并发症如血管刺激、血栓形成可能会中断治疗。为了避免这种中断,通常首选tivap。本研究的目的是评估麻醉团队植入TIVAPs的器械相关并发症和安全性。方法:回顾性研究2017年1月至2020年12月在我院行TIVAPs植入术的患者。记录患者的人口学资料、血管通路侧、与TIVAPs插入术相关的并发症、拔除导管的数量、拔除导管的原因。结果:在本研究期间,我院共实施了700例TIVAPs手术。646例(92.3%)患者右侧植入tivap, 678例(96.8%)患者锁骨下静脉植入tivap。当该患者组中最常见的癌症是结肠直肠癌时,其次是肝胆道癌组。因某种原因拔管107例,占全部患者的15.2%。在检查拔管原因时发现,虽然全身性感染是最常见的原因(47例,占6.7%),但端口培养阳性的患者极少(19例,占2.71%)。结论:我们认为在超声引导和透视控制下在手术室内置入TIVAPs,并发症的发生率相对较低。特别是在癌症患者中,TIVAPs可以安全插入和使用,患者舒适度高。关键词:全植入式静脉通道系统,并发症,患者安全,端口感染
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anestezi Dergisi
Anestezi Dergisi Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信