From Rorty To Gaia

IF 0.6 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
J. Golinski
{"title":"From Rorty To Gaia","authors":"J. Golinski","doi":"10.1215/0961754x-10332747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This contribution to the Common Knowledge symposium “Whatever Happened to Richard Rorty?” endorses Nicholas Gaskill’s analysis of Rorty’s limited legacy in the field of science and technology studies. It shows how, rather than engaging with scientific practice in a substantial way, Rorty relied heavily on the ideas of Thomas Kuhn. The article surveys the development of science studies since Kuhn’s day, sketching an intellectual genealogy for Bruno Latour and Isabelle Stengers, whose work addresses — much more directly than Rorty’s — current concerns with the climate crisis and environmental degradation.","PeriodicalId":45679,"journal":{"name":"Common Knowledge","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Common Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/0961754x-10332747","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:This contribution to the Common Knowledge symposium “Whatever Happened to Richard Rorty?” endorses Nicholas Gaskill’s analysis of Rorty’s limited legacy in the field of science and technology studies. It shows how, rather than engaging with scientific practice in a substantial way, Rorty relied heavily on the ideas of Thomas Kuhn. The article surveys the development of science studies since Kuhn’s day, sketching an intellectual genealogy for Bruno Latour and Isabelle Stengers, whose work addresses — much more directly than Rorty’s — current concerns with the climate crisis and environmental degradation.
从罗蒂到盖亚
摘要:本文是对常识研讨会“理查德·罗蒂到底发生了什么?”赞同尼古拉斯·加斯基尔(Nicholas Gaskill)对罗蒂在科学技术研究领域有限遗产的分析。它显示了罗蒂如何在很大程度上依赖于托马斯·库恩(Thomas Kuhn)的观点,而不是实质性地参与科学实践。这篇文章调查了自库恩时代以来科学研究的发展,勾勒出布鲁诺·拉图尔和伊莎贝尔·斯坦厄斯的知识谱系,他们的工作比罗蒂更直接地解决了当前对气候危机和环境退化的关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Common Knowledge
Common Knowledge HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信