Analysis of the Thinking Process of Science Teachers: The Light Absorption Thought Experiment

IF 0.3 Q4 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
F. K. Uyar, O. Karamustafaoğlu
{"title":"Analysis of the Thinking Process of Science Teachers: The Light Absorption Thought Experiment","authors":"F. K. Uyar, O. Karamustafaoğlu","doi":"10.15294/jpfi.v18i2.34243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this research is to investigate the thinking processes of science teachers who are master students in science education regarding the thought experiment designed for the light absorption. For this aim, the phenomenological study method, one of the qualitative research designs, was used. In the study, eight science teachers who were continuing their master were studied by using purposive sampling. Data were collected through interviews on the light absorption thought experiment. Data were collected through face-to-face problem-solving sessions, thinking aloud and backward questioning. From the data, it is seen that the teachers mostly showed secondary effects as establishing a new amount relationship, they carried out thought experiments to conviction, and while they preferred scientific concepts and intuition-based simulations as sources of thinking equally, spatial reasoning-symmetry-compound simulation and experience were preferred equally and less frequently. At the end of the research, it was concluded that the self-efficacy perceptions of the science teachers were high, having a command of the curriculum, having an uneasy mood when solving problems, and having hypothetical thinking skills.","PeriodicalId":42020,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia-Indonesian Journal of Physics Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia-Indonesian Journal of Physics Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v18i2.34243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The aim of this research is to investigate the thinking processes of science teachers who are master students in science education regarding the thought experiment designed for the light absorption. For this aim, the phenomenological study method, one of the qualitative research designs, was used. In the study, eight science teachers who were continuing their master were studied by using purposive sampling. Data were collected through interviews on the light absorption thought experiment. Data were collected through face-to-face problem-solving sessions, thinking aloud and backward questioning. From the data, it is seen that the teachers mostly showed secondary effects as establishing a new amount relationship, they carried out thought experiments to conviction, and while they preferred scientific concepts and intuition-based simulations as sources of thinking equally, spatial reasoning-symmetry-compound simulation and experience were preferred equally and less frequently. At the end of the research, it was concluded that the self-efficacy perceptions of the science teachers were high, having a command of the curriculum, having an uneasy mood when solving problems, and having hypothetical thinking skills.
科学教师思维过程分析——光吸收思维实验
摘要本研究旨在探讨科学教育硕士生科学教师对光吸收设计的思维实验的思维过程。为此,采用了质性研究设计之一的现象学研究方法。在本研究中,我们采用有目的抽样的方法对8名正在继续攻读硕士学位的科学教师进行了研究。通过对光吸收思维实验的访谈收集数据。数据是通过面对面解决问题、大声思考和逆向提问来收集的。从数据中可以看出,教师以建立新的数量关系为主,以思维实验为主,以信念为主,以科学概念和基于直觉的模拟为思维来源,以空间推理-对称-复合模拟和经验为思维来源,两者均为次要效果,且次数较少。研究结果表明,科学教师的自我效能感较高,对课程的掌握程度较高,解决问题时情绪不安,具有假设思维能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
33.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信