Fracture Pressure, Leak-Off Tests and Poisson's Ratio

IF 1.9 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
R. Lahann, R. Swarbrick
{"title":"Fracture Pressure, Leak-Off Tests and Poisson's Ratio","authors":"R. Lahann, R. Swarbrick","doi":"10.1144/petgeo2021-103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fracture pressure models are used to create pre-drill fracture pressure/depth plots essential to the design of drilling and casing programs in oil and gas wells, and future development of carbon capture and underground storage. Some of these models include an empirical term (stress ratio) which relates effective horizontal stress to effective vertical stress. Based on the literature, stress ratio is assumed to vary with compaction and can be calculated from Poisson's ratio (ν). An alternative to models which utilize the stress ratio term is a model which relates fracture pressure to a constant fraction of the vertical stress. This paper demonstrates that a constant fraction of vertical stress is equivalent to a stress ratio which increases slightly with depth.Estimation of how the ν changes with compaction is complicated by the multiple methods which are commonly employed to measure ν. The available static and dynamic ν data suggest a substantial decrease in ν with porosity reduction. Evaluation of in situ ν data from leak-off tests (LOTS) and associated fluid pressure data in Tertiary Basins indicates that in situ ν does not decline as rapidly as indicated by the other methods of ν determination. In situ ν data indicate that calibration of stress ratio from traditional ν methods is not appropriate and may substantially underestimate fracture pressure (Fp).Fracture pressure models which utilize a constant fraction of vertical stress or estimate stress ratio empirically from LOT data should be employed for pre-drill estimation of fracture pressure.Thematic collection: This article is part of the Geopressure collection available at: https://www.lyellcollection.org/cc/geopressure","PeriodicalId":49704,"journal":{"name":"Petroleum Geoscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Petroleum Geoscience","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1144/petgeo2021-103","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Fracture pressure models are used to create pre-drill fracture pressure/depth plots essential to the design of drilling and casing programs in oil and gas wells, and future development of carbon capture and underground storage. Some of these models include an empirical term (stress ratio) which relates effective horizontal stress to effective vertical stress. Based on the literature, stress ratio is assumed to vary with compaction and can be calculated from Poisson's ratio (ν). An alternative to models which utilize the stress ratio term is a model which relates fracture pressure to a constant fraction of the vertical stress. This paper demonstrates that a constant fraction of vertical stress is equivalent to a stress ratio which increases slightly with depth.Estimation of how the ν changes with compaction is complicated by the multiple methods which are commonly employed to measure ν. The available static and dynamic ν data suggest a substantial decrease in ν with porosity reduction. Evaluation of in situ ν data from leak-off tests (LOTS) and associated fluid pressure data in Tertiary Basins indicates that in situ ν does not decline as rapidly as indicated by the other methods of ν determination. In situ ν data indicate that calibration of stress ratio from traditional ν methods is not appropriate and may substantially underestimate fracture pressure (Fp).Fracture pressure models which utilize a constant fraction of vertical stress or estimate stress ratio empirically from LOT data should be employed for pre-drill estimation of fracture pressure.Thematic collection: This article is part of the Geopressure collection available at: https://www.lyellcollection.org/cc/geopressure
破裂压力、泄漏试验和泊松比
裂缝压力模型用于创建钻前裂缝压力/深度图,这对油气井钻井和套管程序的设计以及碳捕获和地下储存的未来发展至关重要。其中一些模型包括一个经验项(应力比),它将有效水平应力与有效垂直应力联系起来。根据文献,假设应力比随压实度变化,并可根据泊松比(Γ)进行计算。利用应力比项的模型的替代方案是将破裂压力与垂直应力的恒定分数相关联的模型。本文证明了垂直应力的恒定分数相当于应力比,该应力比随深度略有增加。由于通常用于测量Γ的多种方法,估算Γ如何随压实度变化变得复杂。可用的静态和动态数据表明,随着孔隙度的降低,η显著降低。对第三系盆地泄漏测试(LOTS)的现场数据和相关流体压力数据的评估表明,现场数据的下降速度不如其他方法的数据。现场数据表明,用传统方法校准应力比是不合适的,可能会大大低估裂缝压力(Fp)。应采用利用垂直应力的恒定分数或根据LOT数据经验估计应力比的裂缝压力模型来进行钻前裂缝压力估计。专题收藏:本文是地质压力收藏的一部分,可在:https://www.lyellcollection.org/cc/geopressure
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Petroleum Geoscience
Petroleum Geoscience 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
11.80%
发文量
28
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Petroleum Geoscience is the international journal of geoenergy and applied earth science, and is co-owned by the Geological Society of London and the European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers (EAGE). Petroleum Geoscience transcends disciplinary boundaries and publishes a balanced mix of articles covering exploration, exploitation, appraisal, development and enhancement of sub-surface hydrocarbon resources and carbon repositories. The integration of disciplines in an applied context, whether for fluid production, carbon storage or related geoenergy applications, is a particular strength of the journal. Articles on enhancing exploration efficiency, lowering technological and environmental risk, and improving hydrocarbon recovery communicate the latest developments in sub-surface geoscience to a wide readership. Petroleum Geoscience provides a multidisciplinary forum for those engaged in the science and technology of the rock-related sub-surface disciplines. The journal reaches some 8000 individual subscribers, and a further 1100 institutional subscriptions provide global access to readers including geologists, geophysicists, petroleum and reservoir engineers, petrophysicists and geochemists in both academia and industry. The journal aims to share knowledge of reservoir geoscience and to reflect the international nature of its development.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信