Identifying Multilevel Community Supervision Challenges to Inform Diversion Approaches for People With Mental Illnesses

IF 1.3 2区 社会学 Q3 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Allison K. Waters, Mariah Cowell Mercier, Mackensie Disbennett, Suzanne Ziaii, Gary S. Cuddeback, Tracy Velázquez, Tonya B. Van Deinse
{"title":"Identifying Multilevel Community Supervision Challenges to Inform Diversion Approaches for People With Mental Illnesses","authors":"Allison K. Waters, Mariah Cowell Mercier, Mackensie Disbennett, Suzanne Ziaii, Gary S. Cuddeback, Tracy Velázquez, Tonya B. Van Deinse","doi":"10.1177/10439862231189418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Efforts to divert people with mental illnesses from the criminal legal system are widespread among mental health and criminal justice authorities. Most diversion efforts focus on directing individuals with mental illnesses to treatment; however, these treatment-focused interventions are an insufficient approach to diverting people with mental illnesses from the criminal legal system and fail to adequately address organizational and system-level factors that impact criminal legal system involvement. This study uses a social ecological approach to identify multilevel supervision challenges that probation officers face in diverting people with mental illnesses from future criminal legal system involvement. Twenty-six probation agency representatives from across the United States were interviewed as part of a larger study about supervising people with mental illnesses on probation. Salient themes indicate diversion targets related to (1) probation officer and agency capacity, (2) interorganizational relationships and roles, and (3) resources and systems in the local community. A comprehensive framework for diversion must include a both-and approach that maintains focus on individual-level supports and predictors of recidivism and violations, while also targeting the macro- or system-level factors that create the conditions for recidivism at the individual level.","PeriodicalId":47370,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice","volume":"39 1","pages":"513 - 536"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10439862231189418","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Efforts to divert people with mental illnesses from the criminal legal system are widespread among mental health and criminal justice authorities. Most diversion efforts focus on directing individuals with mental illnesses to treatment; however, these treatment-focused interventions are an insufficient approach to diverting people with mental illnesses from the criminal legal system and fail to adequately address organizational and system-level factors that impact criminal legal system involvement. This study uses a social ecological approach to identify multilevel supervision challenges that probation officers face in diverting people with mental illnesses from future criminal legal system involvement. Twenty-six probation agency representatives from across the United States were interviewed as part of a larger study about supervising people with mental illnesses on probation. Salient themes indicate diversion targets related to (1) probation officer and agency capacity, (2) interorganizational relationships and roles, and (3) resources and systems in the local community. A comprehensive framework for diversion must include a both-and approach that maintains focus on individual-level supports and predictors of recidivism and violations, while also targeting the macro- or system-level factors that create the conditions for recidivism at the individual level.
识别多层次社区监督挑战,为精神疾病患者提供信息转移方法
精神卫生和刑事司法当局普遍努力将精神疾病患者从刑事司法系统中转移出去。大多数转移注意力的努力都集中在指导精神疾病患者接受治疗;然而,这些以治疗为重点的干预措施不足以将精神疾病患者从刑事法律系统中转移出来,也未能充分解决影响刑事法律系统参与的组织和系统层面的因素。本研究使用社会生态学方法来识别缓刑官员在将精神疾病患者从未来的刑事法律体系中转移出来时所面临的多层次监督挑战。来自美国各地的26名缓刑机构代表接受了采访,这是一项关于监督缓刑期间精神疾病患者的大型研究的一部分。突出主题表明转移目标与(1)缓刑官和机构能力,(2)组织间关系和角色,以及(3)当地社区的资源和系统相关。一个全面的转移犯罪框架必须包括一种兼容并蓄的方法,既要关注个人层面的支持和累犯和违法行为的预测因素,又要关注在个人层面上为累犯创造条件的宏观或系统层面的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice presents single-themed special issues that focus on a critical issue in contemporary criminal justice in order to provide a cogent, thorough, and timely exploration of the topic. Subjects include such concerns as organized crime, community policings, gangs, white-collar crime, and excessive police force.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信