Biopreservative technologies of food: an alternative to chemical preservation and recent developments

IF 2.4 3区 农林科学 Q3 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Kirupa Sankar Muthuvelu, Baranitharan Ethiraj, Shreyasi Pramnik, N. Keerthish Raj, Swethaa Venkataraman, Devi Sri Rajendran, Priyadharshini Bharathi, Elakiya Palanisamy, Anusri Sathiya Narayanan, Vinoth Kumar Vaidyanathan, Shanmugaprakash Muthusamy
{"title":"Biopreservative technologies of food: an alternative to chemical preservation and recent developments","authors":"Kirupa Sankar Muthuvelu,&nbsp;Baranitharan Ethiraj,&nbsp;Shreyasi Pramnik,&nbsp;N. Keerthish Raj,&nbsp;Swethaa Venkataraman,&nbsp;Devi Sri Rajendran,&nbsp;Priyadharshini Bharathi,&nbsp;Elakiya Palanisamy,&nbsp;Anusri Sathiya Narayanan,&nbsp;Vinoth Kumar Vaidyanathan,&nbsp;Shanmugaprakash Muthusamy","doi":"10.1007/s10068-023-01336-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite centuries of developing strategies to prevent food-associated illnesses, food safety remains a significant concern, even with multiple technological advancements. Consumers increasingly seek less processed and naturally preserved food options. One promising approach is food biopreservation, which uses natural antimicrobials found in food with a long history of safe consumption and can help reduce the reliance on chemically synthesized food preservatives. The hurdle technology method that combines multiple antimicrobial strategies is often used to improve the effectiveness of food biopreservation. This review attempts to provide a research summary on the utilization of lactic acid bacteria, bacteriocins, endolysins, bacteriophages, and biopolymers helps in the improvement of the shelf-life of food and lower the risk of food-borne pathogens throughout the food supply chain. This review also aims to evaluate current technologies that successfully employ the aforementioned preservatives to address obstacles in food biopreservation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":566,"journal":{"name":"Food Science and Biotechnology","volume":"32 10","pages":"1337 - 1350"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10068-023-01336-8.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Science and Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10068-023-01336-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Despite centuries of developing strategies to prevent food-associated illnesses, food safety remains a significant concern, even with multiple technological advancements. Consumers increasingly seek less processed and naturally preserved food options. One promising approach is food biopreservation, which uses natural antimicrobials found in food with a long history of safe consumption and can help reduce the reliance on chemically synthesized food preservatives. The hurdle technology method that combines multiple antimicrobial strategies is often used to improve the effectiveness of food biopreservation. This review attempts to provide a research summary on the utilization of lactic acid bacteria, bacteriocins, endolysins, bacteriophages, and biopolymers helps in the improvement of the shelf-life of food and lower the risk of food-borne pathogens throughout the food supply chain. This review also aims to evaluate current technologies that successfully employ the aforementioned preservatives to address obstacles in food biopreservation.

食品生物保鲜技术:化学保鲜的替代方法及最新进展
尽管几个世纪以来一直在制定预防食品相关疾病的战略,但即使有多项技术进步,食品安全仍然是一个重大问题。消费者越来越多地寻求较少加工和自然保存的食品选择。一种有希望的方法是食品生物保存,它使用在长期安全食用的食品中发现的天然抗菌剂,有助于减少对化学合成食品防腐剂的依赖。结合多种抗菌策略的跨栏技术方法常被用于提高食品生物保存的有效性。本文综述了乳酸菌、细菌素、内溶素、噬菌体和生物聚合物在提高食品保质期和降低食品供应链中食源性病原体风险方面的研究进展。本综述还旨在评价目前成功使用上述防腐剂来解决食品生物保存障碍的技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food Science and Biotechnology
Food Science and Biotechnology FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
174
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: The FSB journal covers food chemistry and analysis for compositional and physiological activity changes, food hygiene and toxicology, food microbiology and biotechnology, and food engineering involved in during and after food processing through physical, chemical, and biological ways. Consumer perception and sensory evaluation on processed foods are accepted only when they are relevant to the laboratory research work. As a general rule, manuscripts dealing with analysis and efficacy of extracts from natural resources prior to the processing or without any related food processing may not be considered within the scope of the journal. The FSB journal does not deal with only local interest and a lack of significant scientific merit. The main scope of our journal is seeking for human health and wellness through constructive works and new findings in food science and biotechnology field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信