Space to Think: Co-Designing a Library Environment for Student Ideation

IF 1.9 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Erin Passehl-Stoddart, Genifer Snipes
{"title":"Space to Think: Co-Designing a Library Environment for Student Ideation","authors":"Erin Passehl-Stoddart, Genifer Snipes","doi":"10.1080/13614533.2020.1777173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The University of Oregon (UO) Libraries recently launched the campus’s first ideation room, the Innovation, Design, Education, and Aspire (IDEA) Space. The IDEA Space differentiates from other creative spaces such as makerspaces, digital humanities labs, and media centres by its focus on the intellectual aspects of the design thinking process – generation, development, and testing of ideas – rather than the practicalities of prototyping and production. This case study discusses the co-participatory design process used to create this new space, including focus groups, user voting, policy discussions around access and technology, and plans for iterative design changes and assessment moving forward. Key takeaways from the student-initiated project included the need for developing a shared understanding of the spaces’ purpose and scope across a variety of stakeholder groups, managing expectations regarding aspirational versus attainable goals, and the difficulty of maintaining the continuity of a student-initiated project in the face of student turnover.","PeriodicalId":38971,"journal":{"name":"New Review of Academic Librarianship","volume":"6 4","pages":"365 - 384"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13614533.2020.1777173","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Review of Academic Librarianship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2020.1777173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract The University of Oregon (UO) Libraries recently launched the campus’s first ideation room, the Innovation, Design, Education, and Aspire (IDEA) Space. The IDEA Space differentiates from other creative spaces such as makerspaces, digital humanities labs, and media centres by its focus on the intellectual aspects of the design thinking process – generation, development, and testing of ideas – rather than the practicalities of prototyping and production. This case study discusses the co-participatory design process used to create this new space, including focus groups, user voting, policy discussions around access and technology, and plans for iterative design changes and assessment moving forward. Key takeaways from the student-initiated project included the need for developing a shared understanding of the spaces’ purpose and scope across a variety of stakeholder groups, managing expectations regarding aspirational versus attainable goals, and the difficulty of maintaining the continuity of a student-initiated project in the face of student turnover.
思考空间:共同设计图书馆学生思维环境
摘要俄勒冈大学图书馆最近推出了校园内的第一个创意室,创新、设计、教育和抱负空间。IDEA空间与其他创意空间(如制造空间、数字人文实验室和媒体中心)的区别在于,它专注于设计思维过程的智力方面——想法的生成、开发和测试——而不是原型设计和生产的实用性。本案例研究讨论了用于创建这一新空间的共同参与设计过程,包括焦点小组、用户投票、围绕访问和技术的政策讨论,以及迭代设计更改和评估的计划。学生发起的项目的主要收获包括需要在各种利益相关者群体中发展对空间目的和范围的共同理解,管理对理想目标和可实现目标的期望,以及在学生流动的情况下保持学生发起项目的连续性的困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
New Review of Academic Librarianship
New Review of Academic Librarianship Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信