COERCION AS A SIGN OF LAW ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES OF SPECIAL STATE BODIES

{"title":"COERCION AS A SIGN OF LAW ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES OF SPECIAL STATE BODIES","authors":"","doi":"10.22394/2074-7306-2022-1-4-117-124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the legal regulation of the implementation of the sign of coercion in the law enforcement activities of special state bodies, the types of which are defined as criminal procedural, administrative-legal, operational-search, control and supervisory activities. The general tasks of this activity are substantiated, consisting in the identification and suppression of offenses, the identification of the persons who committed them, the comprehensive, complete, objective and timely clarification of the circumstances of each case, ensuring the correct application of the law. The conclusion is formulated that coercion is not a common (universal) feature for all special bodies that carry out law enforcement activities.","PeriodicalId":33262,"journal":{"name":"SeveroKavkazskii iuridicheskii vestnik","volume":"124 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SeveroKavkazskii iuridicheskii vestnik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-7306-2022-1-4-117-124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article analyzes the legal regulation of the implementation of the sign of coercion in the law enforcement activities of special state bodies, the types of which are defined as criminal procedural, administrative-legal, operational-search, control and supervisory activities. The general tasks of this activity are substantiated, consisting in the identification and suppression of offenses, the identification of the persons who committed them, the comprehensive, complete, objective and timely clarification of the circumstances of each case, ensuring the correct application of the law. The conclusion is formulated that coercion is not a common (universal) feature for all special bodies that carry out law enforcement activities.
胁迫作为特殊国家机关执法活动的标志
文章分析了在特殊国家机构的执法活动中实施胁迫标志的法律规定,这些机构的类型被定义为刑事诉讼、行政法律、行动搜查、控制和监督活动。这项活动的一般任务得到了证实,包括查明和制止犯罪,查明犯罪者,全面、完整、客观和及时地澄清每个案件的情况,确保法律的正确适用。结论是,胁迫并不是所有从事执法活动的特别机构的共同(普遍)特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信