Differentiating renal cell carcinoma and oncocytoma with volumetric MRI histogram analysis.

Northern clinics of Istanbul Pub Date : 2023-09-27 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.14744/nci.2023.26122
Ozlem Akinci, Furkan Turkoglu, Mustafa Orhan Nalbant, Ercan Inci
{"title":"Differentiating renal cell carcinoma and oncocytoma with volumetric MRI histogram analysis.","authors":"Ozlem Akinci,&nbsp;Furkan Turkoglu,&nbsp;Mustafa Orhan Nalbant,&nbsp;Ercan Inci","doi":"10.14744/nci.2023.26122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this study, the utility of histogram parameters derived from diffusion-weighted imaging for differentiate renal cell carcinoma (RCC) from oncocytoma was investigated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This research tracked 126 individuals who were diagnosed with RCC and oncocytoma through histopathological analysis, using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessments from 2015 to 2023. We observed various attributes of these patients, including demographic details, surgical records, pre-surgery MRI results, MRI apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histogram analysis, and post-surgery histopathological outcomes. Calculations of ADC measurements such as mean, minimum, and maximum in conjunction with the 5<sup>th</sup>, 10<sup>th</sup>, 25<sup>th</sup>, 50<sup>th</sup>, 75<sup>th</sup>, 90<sup>th</sup>, and 95<sup>th</sup> quantile points were made. In addition, we also noted the skewness, kurtosis, and variance of these data points.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The focus group for this investigation consisted of 75 male and 51 female patients. Out of these, 82 were diagnosed with RCC and 44 with oncocytoma. All ADC parameters including ADCmin, ADCmedian, ADCmean, and ADCmax, including the 5<sup>th</sup>, 10<sup>th</sup>, 25<sup>th</sup>, 50<sup>th</sup>, 75<sup>th</sup>, 90<sup>th</sup>, and 95<sup>th</sup> quantile divisions among the oncocytoma cohort were observed to be higher than the corresponding ones in the RCC group. A statistically meaningful difference was discovered between the minimum ADC value along with the 5<sup>th</sup> ranking of ADC measurements (p<0.001), in addition to mean of ADC (p=0.050), and the 10<sup>th</sup> (p=0.002) and 25<sup>th</sup> (p=0.015) quantiles of ADC data. When considering the region below the curve (AUC) in ROC analysis, the value of ADCmin was recorded as 0.739, with a sensitivity of 75.0%, and specificity of 68.2%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To distinguish oncocytoma from RCC, it may be useful to conduct a whole-tumor histogram and textural analysis of ADC values.</p>","PeriodicalId":94347,"journal":{"name":"Northern clinics of Istanbul","volume":"10 5","pages":"636-641"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/57/34/NCI-10-636.PMC10565746.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Northern clinics of Istanbul","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/nci.2023.26122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: In this study, the utility of histogram parameters derived from diffusion-weighted imaging for differentiate renal cell carcinoma (RCC) from oncocytoma was investigated.

Methods: This research tracked 126 individuals who were diagnosed with RCC and oncocytoma through histopathological analysis, using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessments from 2015 to 2023. We observed various attributes of these patients, including demographic details, surgical records, pre-surgery MRI results, MRI apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histogram analysis, and post-surgery histopathological outcomes. Calculations of ADC measurements such as mean, minimum, and maximum in conjunction with the 5th, 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, 90th, and 95th quantile points were made. In addition, we also noted the skewness, kurtosis, and variance of these data points.

Results: The focus group for this investigation consisted of 75 male and 51 female patients. Out of these, 82 were diagnosed with RCC and 44 with oncocytoma. All ADC parameters including ADCmin, ADCmedian, ADCmean, and ADCmax, including the 5th, 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, 90th, and 95th quantile divisions among the oncocytoma cohort were observed to be higher than the corresponding ones in the RCC group. A statistically meaningful difference was discovered between the minimum ADC value along with the 5th ranking of ADC measurements (p<0.001), in addition to mean of ADC (p=0.050), and the 10th (p=0.002) and 25th (p=0.015) quantiles of ADC data. When considering the region below the curve (AUC) in ROC analysis, the value of ADCmin was recorded as 0.739, with a sensitivity of 75.0%, and specificity of 68.2%.

Conclusion: To distinguish oncocytoma from RCC, it may be useful to conduct a whole-tumor histogram and textural analysis of ADC values.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

体积MRI直方图分析鉴别肾细胞癌和嗜酸细胞瘤。
目的:研究扩散加权成像直方图参数在鉴别肾细胞癌(RCC)和嗜酸细胞瘤中的作用。方法:本研究通过组织病理学分析,使用磁共振成像(MRI)评估,追踪了2015年至2023年诊断为RCC和嗜酸细胞瘤的126名患者。我们观察了这些患者的各种特征,包括人口统计学细节、手术记录、术前MRI结果、MRI表观扩散系数(ADC)直方图分析和术后组织病理学结果。计算ADC测量值,如第5、第10、第25、第50、第75、第90和第95分位数点的平均值、最小值和最大值。此外,我们还注意到了这些数据点的偏度、峰度和方差。结果:本研究的重点人群包括75名男性和51名女性患者。其中82例诊断为RCC,44例诊断为嗜酸细胞瘤。所有ADC参数,包括ADC最小值、ADC中值、ADC平均值和ADC最大值,包括嗜酸细胞瘤队列中的第5、第10、第25、第50、第75、第90和第95分位数,均高于RCC组中的相应分位数。在最小ADC值以及ADC测量的第5位(pth(p=0.002)和ADC数据的第25位(p=0.015)分位数之间发现了具有统计学意义的差异。当考虑ROC分析中的曲线下区域(AUC)时,ADCmin的值记录为0.739,敏感性为75.0%,特异性为68.2%。结论:为了区分嗜酸细胞瘤和RCC,对ADC值进行全肿瘤直方图和纹理分析可能是有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信