Response to paper by Douxfils et al. Oestradiol is not the Holy Grail in the quest for the ideal oestrogen therapy.

Abstract

We express our deep thanks to all distinguished colleagues for their careful reading of our paper (Menopause Rev 2022; 21: 197-199) and for writing their thoughtful and valuable commentary (Menopause Rev 2023; 22: 117-119). We would like to take this opportunity to address some of the issues they have raised. The aim of our paper was to present the most recently published clinical data on the safety profile of oral oestrogen-progestogen hormone therapies with respect to the venous system provided by studies conducted in standard real-world clinical practice. We did not address in our paper estetrol-containing drugs simply because no such studies exist, and the presentation and detailed discussion of basic science findings was out of our paper’s scope. The end-point of both studies discussed by us was exclusively the thromboembolism risk measured by epidemiological and not biochemical Response to paper by Douxfils et al. Oestradiol is not the Holy Grail in the quest for the ideal oestrogen therapy