Incidental learning of faces during threat: No evidence for enhanced physiological responses to former threat identities

IF 2.2 4区 心理学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Sabine Schellhaas, Christian Schmahl, Florian Bublatzky
{"title":"Incidental learning of faces during threat: No evidence for enhanced physiological responses to former threat identities","authors":"Sabine Schellhaas,&nbsp;Christian Schmahl,&nbsp;Florian Bublatzky","doi":"10.1016/j.nlm.2023.107838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Remembering an unfamiliar person and the contextual conditions of that encounter is important for adaptive future behavior<span><span>, especially in a potentially dangerous situation. Initiating defensive behavior in the presence of former dangerous circumstances can be crucial. Recent studies showed selective electrocortical processing of faces that were previously seen in a threat context compared to a safety context, however, this was not reflected in conscious recognition performance. Here, we investigated whether previously seen threat-faces, that could not be remembered, were capable to activate defensive psychophysiological response systems. During an encoding phase, 50 participants with low to moderate levels of anxiety viewed 40 face pictures with neutral expressions (6 s each), without an explicit learning instruction (incidental learning task). Each half of the faces were presented with contextual background colors that signaled either threat-of-shock or safety. In the recognition phase, all old and additional new faces (total of 60) were presented intermixed without context information. Participants had to decide whether a face was new or had been presented previously in a threatening or a safe context. Results show moderate face recognition independent of context conditions. Startle reflex and </span>skin conductance responses (SCR) were more pronounced for threat compared to safety during encoding. For SCR, this differentiation was enhanced with higher levels of depression and anxiety. There were no differential startle reflex or SCR effects during recognition. From a clinical perspective, these findings do not support the notion that perceptual biases and physiological arousal directly relate to threat-associated identity recognition deficits in healthy and clinical participants with anxiety and trauma-related disorders.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":19102,"journal":{"name":"Neurobiology of Learning and Memory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurobiology of Learning and Memory","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1074742723001193","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Remembering an unfamiliar person and the contextual conditions of that encounter is important for adaptive future behavior, especially in a potentially dangerous situation. Initiating defensive behavior in the presence of former dangerous circumstances can be crucial. Recent studies showed selective electrocortical processing of faces that were previously seen in a threat context compared to a safety context, however, this was not reflected in conscious recognition performance. Here, we investigated whether previously seen threat-faces, that could not be remembered, were capable to activate defensive psychophysiological response systems. During an encoding phase, 50 participants with low to moderate levels of anxiety viewed 40 face pictures with neutral expressions (6 s each), without an explicit learning instruction (incidental learning task). Each half of the faces were presented with contextual background colors that signaled either threat-of-shock or safety. In the recognition phase, all old and additional new faces (total of 60) were presented intermixed without context information. Participants had to decide whether a face was new or had been presented previously in a threatening or a safe context. Results show moderate face recognition independent of context conditions. Startle reflex and skin conductance responses (SCR) were more pronounced for threat compared to safety during encoding. For SCR, this differentiation was enhanced with higher levels of depression and anxiety. There were no differential startle reflex or SCR effects during recognition. From a clinical perspective, these findings do not support the notion that perceptual biases and physiological arousal directly relate to threat-associated identity recognition deficits in healthy and clinical participants with anxiety and trauma-related disorders.

威胁过程中的面部附带学习:没有证据表明对以前的威胁身份有增强的生理反应。
记住一个陌生的人和那次遭遇的背景条件对于适应未来的行为很重要,尤其是在潜在的危险情况下。在以前的危险情况下采取防御行为是至关重要的。最近的研究表明,与安全环境相比,对以前在威胁环境中看到的人脸进行选择性皮层电处理,然而,这并没有反映在有意识的识别表现中。在这里,我们调查了以前看到的无法记忆的威胁面孔是否能够激活防御心理生理反应系统。在编码阶段,50名低至中度焦虑的参与者在没有明确学习指导(附带学习任务)的情况下,观看了40张表情中性的人脸照片(每张6张)。每半张脸都有背景色,表示震惊或安全的威胁。在识别阶段,所有旧的和额外的新面孔(总共60个)都是在没有上下文信息的情况下混合呈现的。参与者必须决定一张脸是新的,还是以前在威胁或安全的环境中出现过。结果表明,适度的人脸识别与上下文条件无关。与编码期间的安全性相比,起始反射和皮肤电导反应(SCR)对威胁更为明显。对于SCR,这种分化随着抑郁和焦虑水平的升高而增强。在识别过程中没有差异性的惊吓反射或SCR效应。从临床角度来看,这些发现并不支持这样一种观点,即在患有焦虑和创伤相关疾病的健康和临床参与者中,感知偏差和生理唤醒与威胁相关的身份识别缺陷直接相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
7.40%
发文量
77
审稿时长
12.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurobiology of Learning and Memory publishes articles examining the neurobiological mechanisms underlying learning and memory at all levels of analysis ranging from molecular biology to synaptic and neural plasticity and behavior. We are especially interested in manuscripts that examine the neural circuits and molecular mechanisms underlying learning, memory and plasticity in both experimental animals and human subjects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信