An Evidence Map of Clinical Practice Guideline Recommendations and Quality on Venous Leg Ulcer.

IF 5.8 3区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
Advances in wound care Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-07 DOI:10.1089/wound.2023.0079
Ya-Bin Zhang, Xue-Mei Zhong, Shui-Yu Wang, Dan Ma, Rui Li
{"title":"An Evidence Map of Clinical Practice Guideline Recommendations and Quality on Venous Leg Ulcer.","authors":"Ya-Bin Zhang, Xue-Mei Zhong, Shui-Yu Wang, Dan Ma, Rui Li","doi":"10.1089/wound.2023.0079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Significance:</b> Venous leg ulcers (VLUs) are the most common venous disease, mainly presenting as open skin lesions on the legs or feet and are an important concern in clinical care settings. <b>Recent Advances:</b> Comprehensive tactics were employed to search electronic databases PubMed, Embase, guideline databases, and society websites were searched for Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) on VLU care. The basic information, recommendations for the VLUs, methodological quality, and reporting quality of VLU's CPGs were extracted and captured in Excel. The quality of each CPG was independently assessed by four researchers using AGREE II instrument and the RIGHT checklist. <b>Critical Issues:</b> This study included 19 CPGs with a combined 23 recommendations. The assessment of VLUs was summarized based on the recommendations of VLUs in 11 major items; six on VLU's diagnosis and six on therapeutic strategies of VLUs. The identified CPGs were of mixed quality, and the highest score based on the scope and purpose was 82.85 ± 11.66, whereas the lowest mean score based on the editorial independence by AGREE II was 59.93 ± 21.50. Regarding the RIGHT checklist, field one (basic information) had the highest reporting rate (84.33%), whereas field five (review and quality assurance) had the lowest quality of CPGs (41.11%). <b>Future Directions:</b> This evidence map provided new perspectives in the presentation of evidence. In addition, the evidence map collected and evaluated the characteristics of published CPGs. Thus, the evidence map enhances our knowledge and promotes the development of trustworthy CPGs for VLUs.</p>","PeriodicalId":7413,"journal":{"name":"Advances in wound care","volume":" ","pages":"140-152"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in wound care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2023.0079","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Significance: Venous leg ulcers (VLUs) are the most common venous disease, mainly presenting as open skin lesions on the legs or feet and are an important concern in clinical care settings. Recent Advances: Comprehensive tactics were employed to search electronic databases PubMed, Embase, guideline databases, and society websites were searched for Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) on VLU care. The basic information, recommendations for the VLUs, methodological quality, and reporting quality of VLU's CPGs were extracted and captured in Excel. The quality of each CPG was independently assessed by four researchers using AGREE II instrument and the RIGHT checklist. Critical Issues: This study included 19 CPGs with a combined 23 recommendations. The assessment of VLUs was summarized based on the recommendations of VLUs in 11 major items; six on VLU's diagnosis and six on therapeutic strategies of VLUs. The identified CPGs were of mixed quality, and the highest score based on the scope and purpose was 82.85 ± 11.66, whereas the lowest mean score based on the editorial independence by AGREE II was 59.93 ± 21.50. Regarding the RIGHT checklist, field one (basic information) had the highest reporting rate (84.33%), whereas field five (review and quality assurance) had the lowest quality of CPGs (41.11%). Future Directions: This evidence map provided new perspectives in the presentation of evidence. In addition, the evidence map collected and evaluated the characteristics of published CPGs. Thus, the evidence map enhances our knowledge and promotes the development of trustworthy CPGs for VLUs.

腿部静脉性溃疡临床实践指南建议和质量的证据图。
意义:静脉性腿部溃疡(VLU)是最常见的静脉疾病,主要表现为腿部或脚部的开放性皮肤病变,是临床护理中的一个重要问题。最新进展:采用综合策略搜索电子数据库PubMed、Embase、指南数据库,并在社会网站上搜索关于VLU护理的CPG(临床实践指南)。提取了超大型油轮的基本信息、建议、方法质量和超大型油轮CPG的报告质量,并将其记录在Excel中。四名研究人员使用AGREE II仪器和RIGHT检查表对每个CPG的质量进行了独立评估。关键问题:这项研究包括19个CPG和23项建议。根据VLU在11个主要项目中的建议,对VLU的评估进行了总结;6个关于VLU的诊断,6个关于治疗策略。确定的CPG质量参差不齐,基于范围和目的的最高得分为82.85±11.66,而基于AGREE II编辑独立性的最低平均得分为59.93±21.50。关于RIGHT检查表,第一领域(基本信息)的报告率最高(84.33%),而第五领域(审查和质量保证)的CPG质量最低(41.11%)。未来方向:该证据图为证据的呈现提供了新的视角。此外,证据图收集并评估了已发表的CPG的特征。因此,证据图增强了我们的知识,并促进了VLU值得信赖的CPG的开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in wound care
Advances in wound care Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
4.10%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: Advances in Wound Care rapidly shares research from bench to bedside, with wound care applications for burns, major trauma, blast injuries, surgery, and diabetic ulcers. The Journal provides a critical, peer-reviewed forum for the field of tissue injury and repair, with an emphasis on acute and chronic wounds. Advances in Wound Care explores novel research approaches and practices to deliver the latest scientific discoveries and developments. Advances in Wound Care coverage includes: Skin bioengineering, Skin and tissue regeneration, Acute, chronic, and complex wounds, Dressings, Anti-scar strategies, Inflammation, Burns and healing, Biofilm, Oxygen and angiogenesis, Critical limb ischemia, Military wound care, New devices and technologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信