Dynamic light scattering and transmission electron microscopy in drug delivery: a roadmap for correct characterization of nanoparticles and interpretation of results

IF 12.2 2区 材料科学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Sergey K. Filippov, Ramil Khusnutdinov, Anastasiia Murmiliuk, Wali Inam, Lucia Ya. Zakharova, Hongbo Zhang and Vitaliy V. Khutoryanskiy
{"title":"Dynamic light scattering and transmission electron microscopy in drug delivery: a roadmap for correct characterization of nanoparticles and interpretation of results","authors":"Sergey K. Filippov, Ramil Khusnutdinov, Anastasiia Murmiliuk, Wali Inam, Lucia Ya. Zakharova, Hongbo Zhang and Vitaliy V. Khutoryanskiy","doi":"10.1039/D3MH00717K","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >In this focus article, we provide a scrutinizing analysis of transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and dynamic light scattering (DLS) as the two common methods to study the sizes of nanoparticles with focus on the application in pharmaceutics and drug delivery. Control over the size and shape of nanoparticles is one of the key factors for many biomedical systems. Particle size will substantially affect their permeation through biological membranes. For example, an enhanced permeation and retention effect requires a very narrow range of sizes of nanoparticles (50–200 nm) and even a minor deviation from these values will substantially affect the delivery of drug nanocarriers to the tumour. However, amazingly a great number of research papers in pharmaceutics and drug delivery report a striking difference in nanoparticle size measured by the two most popular experimental techniques (TEM and DLS). In some cases, this difference was reported to be 200–300%, raising the question of which size measurement result is more trustworthy. In this focus article, we primarily focus on the physical aspects that are responsible for the routinely observed mismatch between TEM and DLS results. Some of these factors such as concentration and angle dependencies are commonly underestimated and misinterpreted. We convincingly show that correctly used experimental procedures and a thorough analysis of results generated using both methods can eliminate the DLS and TEM data mismatch completely or will make the results much closer to each other. Also, we provide a clear roadmap for drug delivery and pharmaceutical researchers to conduct reliable DLS measurements.</p>","PeriodicalId":87,"journal":{"name":"Materials Horizons","volume":" 12","pages":" 5354-5370"},"PeriodicalIF":12.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2023/mh/d3mh00717k?page=search","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materials Horizons","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2023/mh/d3mh00717k","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this focus article, we provide a scrutinizing analysis of transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and dynamic light scattering (DLS) as the two common methods to study the sizes of nanoparticles with focus on the application in pharmaceutics and drug delivery. Control over the size and shape of nanoparticles is one of the key factors for many biomedical systems. Particle size will substantially affect their permeation through biological membranes. For example, an enhanced permeation and retention effect requires a very narrow range of sizes of nanoparticles (50–200 nm) and even a minor deviation from these values will substantially affect the delivery of drug nanocarriers to the tumour. However, amazingly a great number of research papers in pharmaceutics and drug delivery report a striking difference in nanoparticle size measured by the two most popular experimental techniques (TEM and DLS). In some cases, this difference was reported to be 200–300%, raising the question of which size measurement result is more trustworthy. In this focus article, we primarily focus on the physical aspects that are responsible for the routinely observed mismatch between TEM and DLS results. Some of these factors such as concentration and angle dependencies are commonly underestimated and misinterpreted. We convincingly show that correctly used experimental procedures and a thorough analysis of results generated using both methods can eliminate the DLS and TEM data mismatch completely or will make the results much closer to each other. Also, we provide a clear roadmap for drug delivery and pharmaceutical researchers to conduct reliable DLS measurements.

Abstract Image

药物递送中的动态光散射和透射电子显微镜:正确表征纳米颗粒和解释结果的路线图。
在这篇重点文章中,我们对透射电子显微镜(TEM)和动态光散射(DLS)这两种研究纳米颗粒尺寸的常用方法进行了仔细分析,重点介绍了它们在药学和药物递送中的应用。控制纳米颗粒的大小和形状是许多生物医学系统的关键因素之一。颗粒大小将显著影响它们通过生物膜的渗透。例如,增强的渗透和保留效果需要非常窄的纳米颗粒尺寸范围(50-200nm),即使与这些值的微小偏差也会显著影响药物纳米载体向肿瘤的递送。然而,令人惊讶的是,药学和药物递送领域的大量研究论文报道了通过两种最流行的实验技术(TEM和DLS)测量的纳米颗粒尺寸的显著差异。在某些情况下,这种差异据报道为200-300%,这就提出了哪个尺寸测量结果更可信的问题。在这篇焦点文章中,我们主要关注导致TEM和DLS结果之间常规观察到的不匹配的物理方面。其中一些因素,如集中度和角度依赖性,通常被低估和误解。我们令人信服地表明,正确使用实验程序并对使用这两种方法产生的结果进行彻底分析,可以完全消除DLS和TEM数据的不匹配,或者使结果更加接近。此外,我们为药物递送和药物研究人员提供了一个明确的路线图,以进行可靠的DLS测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Materials Horizons
Materials Horizons CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
2.30%
发文量
306
审稿时长
1.3 months
期刊介绍: Materials Horizons is a leading journal in materials science that focuses on publishing exceptionally high-quality and innovative research. The journal prioritizes original research that introduces new concepts or ways of thinking, rather than solely reporting technological advancements. However, groundbreaking articles featuring record-breaking material performance may also be published. To be considered for publication, the work must be of significant interest to our community-spanning readership. Starting from 2021, all articles published in Materials Horizons will be indexed in MEDLINE©. The journal publishes various types of articles, including Communications, Reviews, Opinion pieces, Focus articles, and Comments. It serves as a core journal for researchers from academia, government, and industry across all areas of materials research. Materials Horizons is a Transformative Journal and compliant with Plan S. It has an impact factor of 13.3 and is indexed in MEDLINE.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信