Feasibility and Acceptability of Community-Based Telehealth to Prevent Long-Term Care Readmission.

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Telemedicine reports Pub Date : 2023-06-26 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1089/tmr.2022.0040
Jennifer Mallow, Stephen M Davis, Johnathan Herczyk, Margaret Jaynes, Ben Klos, Marcus Canaday, Laurie Theeke
{"title":"Feasibility and Acceptability of Community-Based Telehealth to Prevent Long-Term Care Readmission.","authors":"Jennifer Mallow,&nbsp;Stephen M Davis,&nbsp;Johnathan Herczyk,&nbsp;Margaret Jaynes,&nbsp;Ben Klos,&nbsp;Marcus Canaday,&nbsp;Laurie Theeke","doi":"10.1089/tmr.2022.0040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transitioning to community living after long-term care requires multiple complex individualized interventions to prevent readmission. The current focus of home and community-based services (HCBS) is on increasing consumer engagement and individualizing care. Telehealth interventions provide additional services without the burden of face-to-face encounters and have yet to be evaluated for feasibility and acceptability in rural HCBS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>West Virginia Bureau for Medical Services and West Virginia University implemented and evaluated a telehealth intervention with 26 Aged and Disabled Waiver or Traumatic Brain Injury Waiver participants who were transitioning back into their communities from a long-term care facility. Feasibility was assessed through recruitment process, fidelity to planned intervention, number of people eligible for participation, number of individuals enrolling in the intervention, enrollment process, completed enrollment, engagement in the intervention, number of weeks participating in the intervention, type of devices provided, attrition, and fidelity to original intervention. Satisfaction with services was used as a marker of acceptability for both participants and providers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Half (<i>n</i> = 12) of the enrolled population completed the full 24-week telehealth monitoring period and modification of the original intervention was necessary for most. Provider and participant satisfaction was high. Recruitment and enrollment may have been affected by COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Future implementation will continue to track recruitment and retention efforts. Individualized care plans, demonstration and practice with equipment, family or direct-care worker presence, and live technical support through the phone are needed. Primary care provider and in-home direct-care worker satisfaction workflow planning and evaluation are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":94218,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine reports","volume":"4 1","pages":"135-146"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10523410/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2022.0040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Transitioning to community living after long-term care requires multiple complex individualized interventions to prevent readmission. The current focus of home and community-based services (HCBS) is on increasing consumer engagement and individualizing care. Telehealth interventions provide additional services without the burden of face-to-face encounters and have yet to be evaluated for feasibility and acceptability in rural HCBS.

Methods: West Virginia Bureau for Medical Services and West Virginia University implemented and evaluated a telehealth intervention with 26 Aged and Disabled Waiver or Traumatic Brain Injury Waiver participants who were transitioning back into their communities from a long-term care facility. Feasibility was assessed through recruitment process, fidelity to planned intervention, number of people eligible for participation, number of individuals enrolling in the intervention, enrollment process, completed enrollment, engagement in the intervention, number of weeks participating in the intervention, type of devices provided, attrition, and fidelity to original intervention. Satisfaction with services was used as a marker of acceptability for both participants and providers.

Results: Half (n = 12) of the enrolled population completed the full 24-week telehealth monitoring period and modification of the original intervention was necessary for most. Provider and participant satisfaction was high. Recruitment and enrollment may have been affected by COVID-19.

Conclusion: Future implementation will continue to track recruitment and retention efforts. Individualized care plans, demonstration and practice with equipment, family or direct-care worker presence, and live technical support through the phone are needed. Primary care provider and in-home direct-care worker satisfaction workflow planning and evaluation are required.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

社区远程医疗预防长期护理再教育的可行性和可接受性。
背景:长期护理后过渡到社区生活需要多种复杂的个性化干预措施来防止再次入院。目前,家庭和社区服务(HCBS)的重点是提高消费者参与度和个性化护理。远程医疗干预提供了额外的服务,而没有面对面的接触负担,并且尚未评估农村HCBS的可行性和可接受性。方法:西弗吉尼亚州医疗服务局和西弗吉尼亚大学对26名老年人和残疾人豁免或创伤性脑损伤豁免参与者实施并评估了远程医疗干预,这些参与者从长期护理机构过渡回他们的社区。通过招募过程、对计划干预的忠诚度、有资格参与的人数、参与干预的人数、招募过程、完成的招募、参与干预、参与干预周数、提供的设备类型、自然减员和对原始干预的忠诚度来评估可行性。对服务的满意度被用作参与者和提供者可接受程度的标志。结果:一半(n = 12) 在登记的人群中,完成了整个24周的远程健康监测期,对大多数人来说,修改最初的干预措施是必要的。提供者和参与者的满意度很高。招聘和入学可能受到COVID-19的影响。结论:未来的实施将继续跟踪招聘和留用工作。需要个性化的护理计划、设备演示和实践、家人或直接护理人员在场,以及通过电话提供实时技术支持。需要初级保健提供者和家庭直接护理人员满意度工作流程规划和评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信