Associations of past-year stigma and psychosocial syndemic conditions: Considerations for intersectional stigma measures among Black Sexual Minority Men.

IF 2.7 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Stigma and Health Pub Date : 2023-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-01-09 DOI:10.1037/sah0000435
Cristian J Chandler, Qimin Liu, Andre L Brown, Derrick D Matthews, Alexander C Tsai, Leigh A Bukowski, Lisa A Eaton, Ronald D Stall, M Reuel Friedman
{"title":"Associations of past-year stigma and psychosocial syndemic conditions: Considerations for intersectional stigma measures among Black Sexual Minority Men.","authors":"Cristian J Chandler, Qimin Liu, Andre L Brown, Derrick D Matthews, Alexander C Tsai, Leigh A Bukowski, Lisa A Eaton, Ronald D Stall, M Reuel Friedman","doi":"10.1037/sah0000435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This secondary analysis of a mixed serostatus sample of Black sexual minority men (BSMM) used conditional inference tree methods to explore associations of past-year experienced stigma and psychosocial syndemic conditions. Experienced stigmas were attributed to race, sexuality, socioeconomic status, HIV status or some \"other\" reason. Psychosocial syndemic conditions studied included physical assault, intimate partner violence, polysubstance use, and depression symptomology. Data are from Promoting Our Worth, Equality and Resilience (POWER), a serial, cross-sectional study conducted between 2014-2017 (N=4430). Experiences of multiple stigmas were reported by n=938 (22.1%) of BSMM. Conditional inference tree results revealed that HIV-related stigma and its intersection with \"other\" stigma showed the greatest variance in psychosocial condition prevalence. Our findings suggest that when developing intercategorical intersectional analyses with BSMM, there are important stigmas for BSMM beyond those attributed to race, sexuality, and SES, particularly intersecting with HIV-related stigma. Conditional inference tree analysis shows promise in quantitative explorations of intersectional stigma with BSMM, but will benefit from the inclusion of additional forms of stigma, which should be considered by the field moving forward.</p>","PeriodicalId":53222,"journal":{"name":"Stigma and Health","volume":"8 3","pages":"372-380"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10545331/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stigma and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/sah0000435","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This secondary analysis of a mixed serostatus sample of Black sexual minority men (BSMM) used conditional inference tree methods to explore associations of past-year experienced stigma and psychosocial syndemic conditions. Experienced stigmas were attributed to race, sexuality, socioeconomic status, HIV status or some "other" reason. Psychosocial syndemic conditions studied included physical assault, intimate partner violence, polysubstance use, and depression symptomology. Data are from Promoting Our Worth, Equality and Resilience (POWER), a serial, cross-sectional study conducted between 2014-2017 (N=4430). Experiences of multiple stigmas were reported by n=938 (22.1%) of BSMM. Conditional inference tree results revealed that HIV-related stigma and its intersection with "other" stigma showed the greatest variance in psychosocial condition prevalence. Our findings suggest that when developing intercategorical intersectional analyses with BSMM, there are important stigmas for BSMM beyond those attributed to race, sexuality, and SES, particularly intersecting with HIV-related stigma. Conditional inference tree analysis shows promise in quantitative explorations of intersectional stigma with BSMM, but will benefit from the inclusion of additional forms of stigma, which should be considered by the field moving forward.

过去一年污名化与心理社会综合征状况的关联:黑人性少数群体男性跨部门污名化措施的考虑因素。
这项对黑人性少数群体男性(BSMM)混合血清状态样本的二次分析使用条件推理树方法来探索过去一年经历的污名和心理社会综合征状况的关联。经历过的污名被归因于种族、性取向、社会经济地位、艾滋病毒状况或一些“其他”原因。研究的心理社会综合征包括身体攻击、亲密伴侣暴力、多物质使用和抑郁症。数据来自“促进我们的价值、平等和韧性”(POWER),这是一项在2014-2017年间进行的系列横断面研究(N=4430)。938例(22.1%)BSMM报告有多个柱头的经历。条件推理树结果显示,与HIV相关的污名及其与“其他”污名的交叉显示出心理社会状况患病率的最大差异。我们的研究结果表明,在对BSMM进行跨类别交叉分析时,除了种族、性取向和社会经济地位之外,BSMM还有重要的污名,尤其是与艾滋病毒相关的污名交叉。条件推理树分析在BSMM的交叉柱头的定量探索中显示出了希望,但将受益于包含额外形式的柱头,这一领域应予以考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Stigma and Health
Stigma and Health Multiple-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
94
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信