Biomedical, socio-behavioral, and implementation science gaps in multipurpose prevention technology research.

IF 2.3 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Frontiers in reproductive health Pub Date : 2023-09-01 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frph.2023.1244659
James E Cummins, C Leigh Allen, Sonia Lee, Theresa E Senn
{"title":"Biomedical, socio-behavioral, and implementation science gaps in multipurpose prevention technology research.","authors":"James E Cummins,&nbsp;C Leigh Allen,&nbsp;Sonia Lee,&nbsp;Theresa E Senn","doi":"10.3389/frph.2023.1244659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is strong global need for the development of Multipurpose Prevention Technologies (MPTs) that prevent HIV, pregnancy, and/or other sexually transmitted infections (STIs). However, despite decades of research focused on the development of MPTs, numerous research gaps remain, contributing to reproductive health disparities. This commentary will highlight biomedical, socio-behavioral, and implementation science gaps in MPT research. Biomedical gaps and barriers include limited dosage forms, challenges around drug selection and stable coformulation of multiple drugs, and an unclear regulatory pathway. Behavioral, social, and structural gaps include lack of research around MPT preferences for some subgroups of potential end users, lack of knowledge around whether MPTs improve uptake, adherence, and persistence vs. separate products, and a need to further understand how social and cultural factors might impact MPT interest and use. Gaps in implementation science research will need to be addressed to better understand how to implement MPTs to maximize effectiveness and benefit. This commentary will also identify opportunities for integrating biomedical and behavioral science around MPTs.</p>","PeriodicalId":73103,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in reproductive health","volume":"5 ","pages":"1244659"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10513059/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in reproductive health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frph.2023.1244659","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is strong global need for the development of Multipurpose Prevention Technologies (MPTs) that prevent HIV, pregnancy, and/or other sexually transmitted infections (STIs). However, despite decades of research focused on the development of MPTs, numerous research gaps remain, contributing to reproductive health disparities. This commentary will highlight biomedical, socio-behavioral, and implementation science gaps in MPT research. Biomedical gaps and barriers include limited dosage forms, challenges around drug selection and stable coformulation of multiple drugs, and an unclear regulatory pathway. Behavioral, social, and structural gaps include lack of research around MPT preferences for some subgroups of potential end users, lack of knowledge around whether MPTs improve uptake, adherence, and persistence vs. separate products, and a need to further understand how social and cultural factors might impact MPT interest and use. Gaps in implementation science research will need to be addressed to better understand how to implement MPTs to maximize effectiveness and benefit. This commentary will also identify opportunities for integrating biomedical and behavioral science around MPTs.

多用途预防技术研究中的生物医学、社会行为学和实施科学差距。
全球迫切需要开发预防艾滋病毒、妊娠和/或其他性传播感染的多用途预防技术。然而,尽管几十年来一直专注于MPTs的发展,但仍存在许多研究空白,导致了生殖健康差异。这篇评论将强调MPT研究中的生物医学、社会行为和实施科学差距。生物医学的差距和障碍包括有限的剂型、围绕药物选择和多种药物的稳定共形成的挑战,以及不明确的监管途径。行为、社会和结构方面的差距包括缺乏对某些潜在最终用户亚组的MPT偏好的研究,缺乏对MPT与单独产品相比是否能提高吸收、依从性和持久性的了解,以及需要进一步了解社会和文化因素如何影响MPT的兴趣和使用。需要解决实施科学研究中的差距,以更好地了解如何实施MPT以最大限度地提高效率和效益。这篇评论还将确定围绕MPTs整合生物医学和行为科学的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信