Neuro-Cardiovascular Responses to Sympathetic Stimulation in Fighter Pilots.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 BIOPHYSICS
Marcus Vinicius Dos Santos Rangel, Grace Barros de Sá, Paulo Farinatti, Juliana Pereira Borges
{"title":"Neuro-Cardiovascular Responses to Sympathetic Stimulation in Fighter Pilots.","authors":"Marcus Vinicius Dos Santos Rangel,&nbsp;Grace Barros de Sá,&nbsp;Paulo Farinatti,&nbsp;Juliana Pereira Borges","doi":"10.3357/AMHP.6223.2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>INTRODUCTION:</b> The chronic effects of regular exposure to high acceleration levels (G-force) on the neuro-cardiovascular system are unclear. We compared the mean arterial pressure (MAP) and cardiac autonomic modulation between nonpilots (NP) vs. military fighter (FP) and transport (TP) pilots. Additionally, we correlated the cardiac autonomic indices with the cardiorespiratory fitness and flight experience of FP.<b>METHODS:</b> A total of 21 FP, 8 TP, and 20 NP performed a tilt test (TT), during which beat-to-beat blood pressure and heart rate were recorded.<b>RESULTS:</b> No difference was detected between groups for changes in MAP and heart rate variability indices during the TT. However, the analysis of areas under the curves showed a greater increase in MAP in FP vs. TP and NP. Conversely, there was a greater decrease in indices reflecting vagal modulation in TP vs. FP and NP (rMSSD, pNN50, and SDNN), and a greater increase in heart rate and sympathovagal balance in TP vs. other groups (LF/HF). The maximal oxygen uptake was strongly correlated with the vagal reserve in FP (r = -0.74). Moreover, the total flying hours of FP were positively correlated with resting HFnu (r = 0.47) and inversely correlated with resting LFnu (r = -0.55) and LF/HF (r = -0.46).<b>CONCLUSION:</b> FP had a higher pressor response to TT than TP and NP. Vagal withdrawal and sympathovagal increase induced by TT in FP were similar vs. NP and attenuated vs. TP. Greater cardiorespiratory fitness and accumulated flying hours in FP seemed to favor lower sympathetic and greater vagal modulation at rest.<b>dos Santos Rangel MV, de Sá GB, Farinatti P, Borges JP. <i>Neuro-cardiovascular responses to sympathetic stimulation in fighter pilots</i>. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2023; 94(10):761-769.</b></p>","PeriodicalId":7463,"journal":{"name":"Aerospace medicine and human performance","volume":"94 10","pages":"761-769"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aerospace medicine and human performance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3357/AMHP.6223.2023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The chronic effects of regular exposure to high acceleration levels (G-force) on the neuro-cardiovascular system are unclear. We compared the mean arterial pressure (MAP) and cardiac autonomic modulation between nonpilots (NP) vs. military fighter (FP) and transport (TP) pilots. Additionally, we correlated the cardiac autonomic indices with the cardiorespiratory fitness and flight experience of FP.METHODS: A total of 21 FP, 8 TP, and 20 NP performed a tilt test (TT), during which beat-to-beat blood pressure and heart rate were recorded.RESULTS: No difference was detected between groups for changes in MAP and heart rate variability indices during the TT. However, the analysis of areas under the curves showed a greater increase in MAP in FP vs. TP and NP. Conversely, there was a greater decrease in indices reflecting vagal modulation in TP vs. FP and NP (rMSSD, pNN50, and SDNN), and a greater increase in heart rate and sympathovagal balance in TP vs. other groups (LF/HF). The maximal oxygen uptake was strongly correlated with the vagal reserve in FP (r = -0.74). Moreover, the total flying hours of FP were positively correlated with resting HFnu (r = 0.47) and inversely correlated with resting LFnu (r = -0.55) and LF/HF (r = -0.46).CONCLUSION: FP had a higher pressor response to TT than TP and NP. Vagal withdrawal and sympathovagal increase induced by TT in FP were similar vs. NP and attenuated vs. TP. Greater cardiorespiratory fitness and accumulated flying hours in FP seemed to favor lower sympathetic and greater vagal modulation at rest.dos Santos Rangel MV, de Sá GB, Farinatti P, Borges JP. Neuro-cardiovascular responses to sympathetic stimulation in fighter pilots. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2023; 94(10):761-769.

战斗机飞行员对交感神经刺激的神经-心血管反应。
引言:经常暴露于高加速度(G-force)对神经心血管系统的慢性影响尚不清楚。我们比较了非飞行员(NP)与军用战斗机(FP)和运输飞行员(TP)的平均动脉压(MAP)和心脏自主调节。此外,我们将心脏自主神经指数与FP的心肺健康和飞行体验相关联。方法:共有21名FP、8名TP和20名NP进行了倾斜试验(TT),在此期间记录了逐搏血压和心率。结果:在TT期间,各组间MAP和心率变异性指数的变化没有差异。然而,曲线下面积的分析显示,FP与TP和NP的MAP增加更大。相反,TP与FP和NP的反映迷走神经调节的指数(rMSSD、pNN50和SDNN)减少更大,与其他组相比,TP组的心率和交感迷走神经平衡增加更大(LF/HF)。FP的最大摄氧量与迷走神经储备密切相关(r=-0.74)。此外,FP的总飞行小时与静息HFnu呈正相关(r=0.47),与静息LFnu(r=-0.55)和LF/HF(r=-0.46)呈负相关。结论:FP对TT的升压反应高于TP和NP。TT在FP中诱导的迷走神经退缩和交感迷走神经增加与NP相似,与TP相比减弱。FP中更大的心肺功能和累积飞行时间似乎有利于静息时更低的交感神经和更大的迷走神经调节。Santos Rangel MV,de SáGB,Farinatti P,Borges JP。战斗机飞行员对交感神经刺激的神经-心血管反应。Aerosp Med Hum表演。2023年;94(10):761-769。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Aerospace medicine and human performance
Aerospace medicine and human performance PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
22.20%
发文量
272
期刊介绍: The peer-reviewed monthly journal, Aerospace Medicine and Human Performance (AMHP), formerly Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, provides contact with physicians, life scientists, bioengineers, and medical specialists working in both basic medical research and in its clinical applications. It is the most used and cited journal in its field. It is distributed to more than 80 nations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信