Cost-benefit Analysis of Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Mammography: A Systematic Review.

Q2 Medicine
Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran Pub Date : 2023-08-16 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.47176/mjiri.37.89
Salar Ghorbani, Aziz Rezapour, Mahmoud Eisavi, Maedeh Barahman, Saeed Bagheri Faradonbeh
{"title":"Cost-benefit Analysis of Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Mammography: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Salar Ghorbani, Aziz Rezapour, Mahmoud Eisavi, Maedeh Barahman, Saeed Bagheri Faradonbeh","doi":"10.47176/mjiri.37.89","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast cancer is a non-communicable and common disease that accounts for a high percentage of deaths. Early diagnosis of this disease reduces the death rate. Screening methods such as digital mammography can help prevent or identify the disease earlier. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the cost-benefit of breast cancer using digital mammography.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review was conducted based on PRISMA 2020 checklist. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ProQuest, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were searched without any time limitation on June 2022. The quality of the studies was evaluated with the CHEERS checklist. After data extraction, the results were synthesized by thematic content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the search, 3468 records were identified, of which 1061 were duplicates. 2407 titles and abstracts screened in terms of inclusion criteria. Finally, after studying 20 fulltexts, three of them were included in the study. The quality of these articles was scored between 10 and 16. These studies were from Spain, Denmark, and the United States from 2000 to 2019. Two studies showed that digital mammography is not as effective as other screening methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study showed that digital mammography is not very cost-benefit for the health care system. An increase in its repetition frequency imposes more costs on the health system and doesn't have more benefits for it.</p>","PeriodicalId":18361,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e0/a0/mjiri-37-89.PMC10518066.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47176/mjiri.37.89","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer is a non-communicable and common disease that accounts for a high percentage of deaths. Early diagnosis of this disease reduces the death rate. Screening methods such as digital mammography can help prevent or identify the disease earlier. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the cost-benefit of breast cancer using digital mammography.

Methods: This systematic review was conducted based on PRISMA 2020 checklist. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ProQuest, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were searched without any time limitation on June 2022. The quality of the studies was evaluated with the CHEERS checklist. After data extraction, the results were synthesized by thematic content analysis.

Results: During the search, 3468 records were identified, of which 1061 were duplicates. 2407 titles and abstracts screened in terms of inclusion criteria. Finally, after studying 20 fulltexts, three of them were included in the study. The quality of these articles was scored between 10 and 16. These studies were from Spain, Denmark, and the United States from 2000 to 2019. Two studies showed that digital mammography is not as effective as other screening methods.

Conclusion: The results of this study showed that digital mammography is not very cost-benefit for the health care system. An increase in its repetition frequency imposes more costs on the health system and doesn't have more benefits for it.

Abstract Image

癌症数字化乳腺X线筛查的成本效益分析:系统评价。
背景:癌症是一种非传染性的常见疾病,在死亡中所占比例很高。这种疾病的早期诊断可降低死亡率。数字乳房X光检查等筛查方法可以帮助更早地预防或识别疾病。因此,本研究旨在分析使用数字乳腺摄影术治疗癌症的成本效益。方法:本系统回顾基于PRISMA 2020检查表进行。PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science、ProQuest、Cochrane Library和Google Scholar于2022年6月进行了无时间限制的搜索。研究质量采用CHEERS检查表进行评估。数据提取后,通过主题内容分析对结果进行综合。结果:在搜索过程中,共发现3468条记录,其中1061条是重复记录。2407篇根据纳入标准筛选的标题和摘要。最后,在对20篇全文进行研究后,将其中三篇纳入研究。这些文章的质量评分在10到16分之间。这些研究来自西班牙、丹麦和美国,从2000年到2019年。两项研究表明,数字乳腺摄影不如其他筛查方法有效。结论:本研究的结果表明,数字乳房X光摄影对医疗保健系统来说不是很划算。重复频率的增加给卫生系统带来了更多的成本,但对它没有更多的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信