Comparative Efficacy of Injection Triamcinolone Acetonide given Intralesionally and through Microneedling in Alopecia areata.

Q2 Medicine
International Journal of Trichology Pub Date : 2022-09-01 Epub Date: 2022-10-07 DOI:10.4103/ijt.ijt_140_20
Astha Arora, Mala Bhalla, Gurvinder Pal Thami
{"title":"Comparative Efficacy of Injection Triamcinolone Acetonide given Intralesionally and through Microneedling in <i>Alopecia areata</i>.","authors":"Astha Arora,&nbsp;Mala Bhalla,&nbsp;Gurvinder Pal Thami","doi":"10.4103/ijt.ijt_140_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong><i>Alopecia areata</i> (AA) manifests as patchy hair loss and intralesional corticosteroid (ILCS) is usual therapeutic choice in limited disease. Microneedling is used for uniform delivery of topical agent to relatively larger areas may prove to be more efficacious than traditional ILCS. The present study prospectively compared microneedling to traditional intralesional delivery of triamcinolone acetonide (TA).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Prospective randomized comparative study in 60 patients of AA restricted to scalp not requiring systemic treatment randomly divided into two equal groups. Group 1 patients underwent microneedling with local application of injectable TA and Group 2 patients were given injectable TA intradermally for a total of three sessions at 3 weeks interval.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A mean regrowth of 66.36% in Group 1 and 69.75% in Group 2 at week 9 was seen which was comparative with no significant statistical difference between the two groups (<i>P</i> = 0.664). Thirteen patients achieved 100% regrowth at week 9 in Group 1 and 16 patients achieved 50%-99% regrowth in Group 2.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>ILCSs have been cornerstone in the treatment of limited AA, but depth of injecting drug cannot be controlled, microneedling whereas is an effective drug delivery system and also causes release of growth factors. In this study, injectable TA used intralesionally and topically with microneedling had nearly similar efficacy in causing regrowth of hair with microneedling resulting in a more uniform but less dense regrowth of hair with lesser adverse effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":14417,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Trichology","volume":"14 5","pages":"156-161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9674065/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Trichology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijt.ijt_140_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Alopecia areata (AA) manifests as patchy hair loss and intralesional corticosteroid (ILCS) is usual therapeutic choice in limited disease. Microneedling is used for uniform delivery of topical agent to relatively larger areas may prove to be more efficacious than traditional ILCS. The present study prospectively compared microneedling to traditional intralesional delivery of triamcinolone acetonide (TA).

Materials and methods: Prospective randomized comparative study in 60 patients of AA restricted to scalp not requiring systemic treatment randomly divided into two equal groups. Group 1 patients underwent microneedling with local application of injectable TA and Group 2 patients were given injectable TA intradermally for a total of three sessions at 3 weeks interval.

Results: A mean regrowth of 66.36% in Group 1 and 69.75% in Group 2 at week 9 was seen which was comparative with no significant statistical difference between the two groups (P = 0.664). Thirteen patients achieved 100% regrowth at week 9 in Group 1 and 16 patients achieved 50%-99% regrowth in Group 2.

Discussion and conclusions: ILCSs have been cornerstone in the treatment of limited AA, but depth of injecting drug cannot be controlled, microneedling whereas is an effective drug delivery system and also causes release of growth factors. In this study, injectable TA used intralesionally and topically with microneedling had nearly similar efficacy in causing regrowth of hair with microneedling resulting in a more uniform but less dense regrowth of hair with lesser adverse effects.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

曲安奈德局部注射与微针注射治疗斑秃的疗效比较。
简介:斑秃(AA)表现为斑状脱发,斑秃内皮质类固醇(ILCS)是有限疾病的常用治疗选择。微针用于将局部药物均匀地输送到相对较大的区域,可能比传统的ILCS更有效。本研究前瞻性地比较了微针与传统的局部给药曲安奈德(TA)。材料与方法:前瞻性随机对照研究60例局限于头皮不需全身治疗的AA患者,随机分为两组。组1患者采用微针局部应用可注射TA,组2患者采用皮内注射TA,共3次,间隔3周。结果:第9周,1组和2组的平均再生率分别为66.36%和69.75%,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P = 0.664)。第1组13例患者在第9周再生100%,第2组16例患者再生50%-99%。讨论与结论:il - cs已成为治疗局限性AA的基石,但注射药物的深度无法控制,微针是一种有效的给药系统,同时也会引起生长因子的释放。在本研究中,局部注射TA微针和局部注射TA微针在头发再生方面的效果几乎相同,头发再生更均匀,但密度更低,副作用更小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信