The role of bioimpedance spectroscopy method in severity and stages of breast cancer-related lymphedema.

IF 0.5 Q4 SURGERY
Turkish Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2022-03-28 eCollection Date: 2022-03-01 DOI:10.47717/turkjsurg.2022.5550
Türkan Turgay, Tuba Denkçeken, Göktürk Maralcan
{"title":"The role of bioimpedance spectroscopy method in severity and stages of breast cancer-related lymphedema.","authors":"Türkan Turgay,&nbsp;Tuba Denkçeken,&nbsp;Göktürk Maralcan","doi":"10.47717/turkjsurg.2022.5550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The correlation between lymphedema severity and stages determined by standard diagnostic methods and Bioimpedance Spectroscopy (BIS) technique was examined in breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) patients.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The bioimpedance analyzer device was connected to the 1.0 cm disc electrodes which were connected to the affected and unaffected (healthy) arm of the patients. We evaluated the performance of the impedance (Z) at multiple frequencies (5-50-100-200 kHz) and phase angle (PA), resistance (R), and reactance (XC) at 50 kHz on the lymphedema severity and stages. Bioimpedance measurements were applied to all volunteers in cooperation with the Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Department. In this study, the correlation between BCRL severity and stages and bioimpedance values was examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 31 female patients were recruited to compare the BIS technique with standard diagnostic techniques. The severity of lymphedema was found among the patients as follows; mild 14 (45.2%), moderate 10 (32.3%), and severe 7 (22.6%). The stage distribution of volunteers was; 15 (48.4%) patients in Stage 0, 10 (32.3%) patients in Stage 1, 5 (16.1%) patients in Stage 2, and 1 (3.2%) patient in Stage 3. The ratio of affected and unaffected arm bioimpedance mean values were calculated. Although, this ratio at 50-100-200 kHz Z and 50kHz R were significantly correlated with the lymphedema stages (p <0.05), there was no correlation and significant difference between the ratio of the bioimpedance values and lymphedema severity (p> 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The BIS technique is timesaving and can determine lymphedema stages. We found a significant correlation between BCRL stages and BIS, and it appears that BIS is an appropriate, inexpensive, simple, and noninvasive technique for detecting the stages of BCRL.</p>","PeriodicalId":23374,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Surgery","volume":"38 1","pages":"11-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9278353/pdf/TJS-38-011.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47717/turkjsurg.2022.5550","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The correlation between lymphedema severity and stages determined by standard diagnostic methods and Bioimpedance Spectroscopy (BIS) technique was examined in breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) patients.

Material and methods: The bioimpedance analyzer device was connected to the 1.0 cm disc electrodes which were connected to the affected and unaffected (healthy) arm of the patients. We evaluated the performance of the impedance (Z) at multiple frequencies (5-50-100-200 kHz) and phase angle (PA), resistance (R), and reactance (XC) at 50 kHz on the lymphedema severity and stages. Bioimpedance measurements were applied to all volunteers in cooperation with the Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Department. In this study, the correlation between BCRL severity and stages and bioimpedance values was examined.

Results: A total of 31 female patients were recruited to compare the BIS technique with standard diagnostic techniques. The severity of lymphedema was found among the patients as follows; mild 14 (45.2%), moderate 10 (32.3%), and severe 7 (22.6%). The stage distribution of volunteers was; 15 (48.4%) patients in Stage 0, 10 (32.3%) patients in Stage 1, 5 (16.1%) patients in Stage 2, and 1 (3.2%) patient in Stage 3. The ratio of affected and unaffected arm bioimpedance mean values were calculated. Although, this ratio at 50-100-200 kHz Z and 50kHz R were significantly correlated with the lymphedema stages (p <0.05), there was no correlation and significant difference between the ratio of the bioimpedance values and lymphedema severity (p> 0.05).

Conclusion: The BIS technique is timesaving and can determine lymphedema stages. We found a significant correlation between BCRL stages and BIS, and it appears that BIS is an appropriate, inexpensive, simple, and noninvasive technique for detecting the stages of BCRL.

Abstract Image

生物阻抗谱法在乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿的严重程度和分期中的作用。
目的:通过标准诊断方法和生物阻抗光谱(BIS)技术检测乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿(BCRL)患者淋巴水肿严重程度与分期的相关性。材料和方法:将生物阻抗分析仪装置连接到1.0 cm的圆盘电极上,圆盘电极连接到患者患病和未患病(健康)的手臂上。我们评估了多个频率(5-50-100-200 kHz)的阻抗(Z)和50 kHz的相位角(PA)、电阻(R)和电抗(XC)对淋巴水肿严重程度和分期的影响。与物理治疗和康复科合作,对所有志愿者进行生物阻抗测量。本研究探讨了BCRL严重程度、分期和生物阻抗值的相关性。结果:共招募了31名女性患者,将BIS技术与标准诊断技术进行比较。患者淋巴水肿的严重程度如下:轻度14例(45.2%),中度10例(32.3%),重度7例(22.6%)。志愿者的阶段分布为;0期15例(48.4%),1期10例(32.3%),2期5例(16.1%),3期1例(3.2%)。计算受影响和未受影响手臂生物阻抗平均值的比值。50-100-200 kHz Z和50kHz R的比值与淋巴水肿分期显著相关(p < 0.05)。结论:BIS技术节省时间,可准确判断淋巴水肿分期。我们发现BCRL分期与BIS之间存在显著相关性,BIS似乎是一种合适、廉价、简单且无创的检测BCRL分期的技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信