Interrater reliability and agreement of the liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) v2018 for the evaluation of hepatic lesions.

IF 0.9 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Polish Journal of Radiology Pub Date : 2022-06-13 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.5114/pjr.2022.117590
Ahmed S Abdelrahman, Sherihan S Madkour, Mena E Y Ekladious
{"title":"Interrater reliability and agreement of the liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) v2018 for the evaluation of hepatic lesions.","authors":"Ahmed S Abdelrahman,&nbsp;Sherihan S Madkour,&nbsp;Mena E Y Ekladious","doi":"10.5114/pjr.2022.117590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) is a structured reporting system that categorizes hepatic observations according to major imaging features and lesion size, with an optional ancillary features contribution. This study aimed to evaluate inter-reader agreement of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using LI-RADS v2018 lexicon.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Forty-nine patients with 69 hepatic observations were included in our study. The major and ancillary features of each hepatic observation were evaluated by 2 radiologists using LI-RADS v2018, and the interreader agreement was allocated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The inter-reader agreement of major LI-RADS features was substantial; κ of non-rim arterial hyperenhancement, non-peripheral washout appearance, and enhancing capsule was 0.796, 0.799, and 0.772 (<i>p</i> < 0.001), respectively. The agreement of the final LI-RADS category was substantial with κ = 0.651 (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and weighted κ = 0.786 (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The inter-reader agreement of the ancillary features was substantial to almost perfect (k range from 0.718 to 1; <i>p</i> < 0.001). An almost perfect correlation was noted for the hepatic lesion size measurement with ICC = 0.977 (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The major and ancillary features of the LI-RADS v2018, as well as the final category and lesions size, have substantial to almost perfect inter-reader agreement.</p>","PeriodicalId":47128,"journal":{"name":"Polish Journal of Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/28/81/PJR-87-47352.PMC9288199.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/pjr.2022.117590","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: The liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) is a structured reporting system that categorizes hepatic observations according to major imaging features and lesion size, with an optional ancillary features contribution. This study aimed to evaluate inter-reader agreement of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using LI-RADS v2018 lexicon.

Material and methods: Forty-nine patients with 69 hepatic observations were included in our study. The major and ancillary features of each hepatic observation were evaluated by 2 radiologists using LI-RADS v2018, and the interreader agreement was allocated.

Results: The inter-reader agreement of major LI-RADS features was substantial; κ of non-rim arterial hyperenhancement, non-peripheral washout appearance, and enhancing capsule was 0.796, 0.799, and 0.772 (p < 0.001), respectively. The agreement of the final LI-RADS category was substantial with κ = 0.651 (p < 0.001), and weighted κ = 0.786 (p < 0.001). The inter-reader agreement of the ancillary features was substantial to almost perfect (k range from 0.718 to 1; p < 0.001). An almost perfect correlation was noted for the hepatic lesion size measurement with ICC = 0.977 (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: The major and ancillary features of the LI-RADS v2018, as well as the final category and lesions size, have substantial to almost perfect inter-reader agreement.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

肝脏影像学报告和数据系统(LI-RADS) v2018用于肝脏病变评估的互连可靠性和一致性
目的:肝脏影像学报告和数据系统(LI-RADS)是一个结构化的报告系统,根据肝脏主要影像学特征和病变大小对肝脏观察进行分类,并可选择辅助特征的贡献。本研究旨在使用LI-RADS v2018词典评估动态磁共振成像(MRI)的读者间一致性。材料和方法:我们的研究纳入了49例肝脏观察69例。每个肝脏观察的主要和辅助特征由2名放射科医生使用LI-RADS v2018进行评估,并分配解读者协议。结果:LI-RADS主要特征的读者间一致性较好;非边缘动脉高强化、非外周冲刷和增强胶囊的κ分别为0.796、0.799和0.772 (p < 0.001)。最终的LI-RADS分类一致,κ = 0.651 (p < 0.001),加权κ = 0.786 (p < 0.001)。辅助特征的读者间一致性基本达到完美(k范围为0.718 ~ 1;P < 0.001)。肝病变大小测量几乎完全相关,ICC = 0.977 (p < 0.001)。结论:LI-RADS v2018的主要和辅助特征,以及最终的分类和病变大小,在读者间具有基本或几乎完美的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Polish Journal of Radiology
Polish Journal of Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信