Usability Testing of an iPad Communication Application for Mechanically Ventilated Patients.

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Jill L Guttormson, Natalie S McAndrew
{"title":"Usability Testing of an iPad Communication Application for Mechanically Ventilated Patients.","authors":"Jill L Guttormson,&nbsp;Natalie S McAndrew","doi":"10.1097/DCC.0000000000000551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient communication challenges during mechanical ventilation can negatively impact symptom management and psychological recovery. Alternative communication (AC) aids have the potential to improve mechanically ventilated (MV) patient experiences.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study evaluated the feasibility and usability of a communication application on a tablet (iPad).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A single-group pilot study was guided by the augmentative and alternative communication acceptance model. We recruited patients from 1 medical intensive care unit. Existing communication application software (Proloquo2Go) was tailored to MV patients' needs. Usability testing included patient communication of 5 messages with data collected on success, message completion time, and patient feedback.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten patients with a mean age of 50 years (SD, 16.7) were enrolled. Of the 7 patients able to complete usability testing, 85.7% found the device easy to use, and 100% wanted the iPad available for their use when on the ventilator. Three patients were extubated immediately after usability testing. Two patients preferred other modes of communication (writing). Two patients used the iPad as their primary mode of communication during the remainder of their time on the ventilator. Nurse feedback on the communication application was positive.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Tablet-based communication applications can be successfully used by MV patients and should be considered as 1 tool to support effective patient communication during mechanical ventilation. Future research is needed to identify which patients may be most likely to benefit from the availability of these devices.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DCC.0000000000000551","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Patient communication challenges during mechanical ventilation can negatively impact symptom management and psychological recovery. Alternative communication (AC) aids have the potential to improve mechanically ventilated (MV) patient experiences.

Objectives: This study evaluated the feasibility and usability of a communication application on a tablet (iPad).

Method: A single-group pilot study was guided by the augmentative and alternative communication acceptance model. We recruited patients from 1 medical intensive care unit. Existing communication application software (Proloquo2Go) was tailored to MV patients' needs. Usability testing included patient communication of 5 messages with data collected on success, message completion time, and patient feedback.

Results: Ten patients with a mean age of 50 years (SD, 16.7) were enrolled. Of the 7 patients able to complete usability testing, 85.7% found the device easy to use, and 100% wanted the iPad available for their use when on the ventilator. Three patients were extubated immediately after usability testing. Two patients preferred other modes of communication (writing). Two patients used the iPad as their primary mode of communication during the remainder of their time on the ventilator. Nurse feedback on the communication application was positive.

Discussion: Tablet-based communication applications can be successfully used by MV patients and should be considered as 1 tool to support effective patient communication during mechanical ventilation. Future research is needed to identify which patients may be most likely to benefit from the availability of these devices.

机械通气患者iPad通讯应用的可用性测试
背景:机械通气过程中患者沟通困难会对症状管理和心理恢复产生负面影响。替代通信(AC)辅助设备有可能改善机械通气(MV)患者的体验。目的:本研究评估了平板电脑(iPad)通信应用程序的可行性和可用性。方法:采用辅助和替代沟通接受模型进行单组先导研究。我们从1个医疗重症监护室招募患者。现有的通信应用软件(Proloquo2Go)是根据MV患者的需求量身定制的。可用性测试包括患者与5条消息的沟通,并收集有关成功、消息完成时间和患者反馈的数据。结果:10例患者入组,平均年龄50岁(SD, 16.7)。在能够完成可用性测试的7名患者中,85.7%的患者认为该设备易于使用,100%的患者希望在使用呼吸机时可以使用iPad。三名患者在可用性测试后立即拔管。两名患者更喜欢其他交流方式(写作)。两名患者在使用呼吸机的剩余时间里使用iPad作为他们的主要交流方式。护士对沟通应用的反馈是积极的。讨论:基于平板电脑的通信应用程序可以被中压患者成功使用,应被视为支持机械通气期间患者有效沟通的一种工具。未来的研究需要确定哪些患者最有可能从这些设备的可用性中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信