Development and validation of a fall risk Questionnaire in Greek community-dwelling individuals over 60 years old.

Chrysoula Argyrou, Yannis Dionyssiotis, Antonios Galanos, Ingka Kantaidou, John Vlamis, Ioannis K Triantafyllopoulos, George P Lyritis, Ismene A Dontas, Efstathios Chronopoulos
{"title":"Development and validation of a fall risk Questionnaire in Greek community-dwelling individuals over 60 years old.","authors":"Chrysoula Argyrou,&nbsp;Yannis Dionyssiotis,&nbsp;Antonios Galanos,&nbsp;Ingka Kantaidou,&nbsp;John Vlamis,&nbsp;Ioannis K Triantafyllopoulos,&nbsp;George P Lyritis,&nbsp;Ismene A Dontas,&nbsp;Efstathios Chronopoulos","doi":"10.22540/JFSF-07-133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to develop a questionnaire that can reliably recognize Greek individuals over the age of 60 with increased risk of falls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An 11-item self-reported Questionnaire (LRMS) was developed and delivered to 200 individuals. Collected data were compared to Timed Up and Go (TUG), Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I), Tinetti Assessment Tool, Geriatric Depression Scale-15 (GDS-15) and Morse fall scale. The results were statistically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Correlation between LRMS and the examined tools was high TUG (r=0.831), FES-I (r=-0.820), Tinetti balance (r=-0.812), Tinetti gait (r=-0.789), GDS-15 (r=-0.562), and Morse fall scale (r=0.795). Cronbach's alpha for LRMS total score was 0.807. ICC of the LRMS total score was 0.991. The area under the curve of LRMS was 0.930 (cut-off point 10.5, 95% C.I. 0.88 - 0.98, p<0.001, sensitivity=86%, specificity=98%) with TUG as gold standard, 0.919 (cut-off point 11.5, 95% C.I. 0.88 - 0.96, p<0.001, sensitivity=85%, specificity=89%) with FES-I and 0.947 (cut-off point 10.5, 95% C.I. 0.91 - 0.98, p<0.001, sensitivity=93%, specificity=91%) with Tinetti.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The LRMS Questionnaire showed sufficient internal consistency, excellent test-retest reliability and high correlation with the already established tools for fall risk assessment. It is short and easy to use without assistance from specially trained personnel.</p>","PeriodicalId":73754,"journal":{"name":"Journal of frailty, sarcopenia and falls","volume":" ","pages":"133-146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1d/20/JFSF-7-133.PMC9433940.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of frailty, sarcopenia and falls","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22540/JFSF-07-133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to develop a questionnaire that can reliably recognize Greek individuals over the age of 60 with increased risk of falls.

Methods: An 11-item self-reported Questionnaire (LRMS) was developed and delivered to 200 individuals. Collected data were compared to Timed Up and Go (TUG), Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I), Tinetti Assessment Tool, Geriatric Depression Scale-15 (GDS-15) and Morse fall scale. The results were statistically analyzed.

Results: Correlation between LRMS and the examined tools was high TUG (r=0.831), FES-I (r=-0.820), Tinetti balance (r=-0.812), Tinetti gait (r=-0.789), GDS-15 (r=-0.562), and Morse fall scale (r=0.795). Cronbach's alpha for LRMS total score was 0.807. ICC of the LRMS total score was 0.991. The area under the curve of LRMS was 0.930 (cut-off point 10.5, 95% C.I. 0.88 - 0.98, p<0.001, sensitivity=86%, specificity=98%) with TUG as gold standard, 0.919 (cut-off point 11.5, 95% C.I. 0.88 - 0.96, p<0.001, sensitivity=85%, specificity=89%) with FES-I and 0.947 (cut-off point 10.5, 95% C.I. 0.91 - 0.98, p<0.001, sensitivity=93%, specificity=91%) with Tinetti.

Conclusions: The LRMS Questionnaire showed sufficient internal consistency, excellent test-retest reliability and high correlation with the already established tools for fall risk assessment. It is short and easy to use without assistance from specially trained personnel.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

希腊60岁以上社区居民跌倒风险问卷的开发和验证。
目的:本研究的目的是开发一份问卷,可以可靠地识别60岁以上的希腊人跌倒风险增加。方法:编制11项自述问卷(LRMS),对200人进行问卷调查。收集的数据与Timed Up and Go (TUG)、国际跌倒效能量表(FES-I)、Tinetti评估工具、老年抑郁量表-15 (GDS-15)和Morse跌倒量表进行比较。对结果进行统计学分析。结果:LRMS与检查工具的相关性为高TUG (r=0.831)、FES-I (r=-0.820)、Tinetti平衡(r=-0.812)、Tinetti步态(r=-0.789)、GDS-15 (r=-0.562)和Morse跌倒量表(r=0.795)。LRMS总分的Cronbach's alpha为0.807。LRMS总分的ICC为0.991。LRMS曲线下面积为0.930(截断点10.5,95% ci 0.88 ~ 0.98)。结论:LRMS问卷具有足够的内部一致性,具有良好的重测信度,与已有的跌倒风险评估工具有较高的相关性。它简短且易于使用,无需经过专门培训的人员的帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信