The Potential Relationship Between a Cognitive Dissonance State and Musculoskeletal Injury: A Systematic Review.

IF 2.9 3区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Human Factors Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2022-09-04 DOI:10.1177/00187208221120459
Eric B Weston, Afton L Hassett, Safdar N Khan, Tristan E Weaver, William S Marras
{"title":"The Potential Relationship Between a Cognitive Dissonance State and Musculoskeletal Injury: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Eric B Weston, Afton L Hassett, Safdar N Khan, Tristan E Weaver, William S Marras","doi":"10.1177/00187208221120459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this systematic review was to investigate the potential link between cognitive dissonance or its related constructs (emotional dissonance, emotional labor) and musculoskeletal disorders.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>The etiology of musculoskeletal disorders is complex, as pain arises from complex interactions among physical, social, and psychological stressors. It is possible that the psychological factor of cognitive dissonance may contribute to the etiology and/or maintenance of musculoskeletal disorders.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>MEDLINE, APA PsycInfo, and CINAHL Plus databases were searched for studies investigating cognitive dissonance or its related constructs as exposure(s) of interest and outcomes related to physical health (including, but not limited to, musculoskeletal pain). Risk of bias was assessed using the Appraisal tool for Cross-Sectional Studies (AXIS) tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The literature search yielded 7 studies eligible for inclusion. None of the included studies investigated cognitive dissonance directly but instead investigated dissonance-related constructs of emotional dissonance and emotional labor, in which a mismatch between required and felt emotions might elicit a psychological response consistent with the cognitive dissonance state. Moderate effect sizes between dissonance-related constructs and musculoskeletal disorders were noted (OR 1.25-2.22).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is likely a relationship between the two factors studied. However, as the included studies were cross-sectional in nature, a causal relationship between cognitive dissonance-related constructs and musculoskeletal disorders cannot be inferred. Therefore, future study proposing and validating a causal pathway between these variables is warranted.</p><p><strong>Application: </strong>Cognitive dissonance and its related constructs may serve as risk factors for musculoskeletal disorders that have not been considered previously.</p>","PeriodicalId":56333,"journal":{"name":"Human Factors","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Factors","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208221120459","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this systematic review was to investigate the potential link between cognitive dissonance or its related constructs (emotional dissonance, emotional labor) and musculoskeletal disorders.

Background: The etiology of musculoskeletal disorders is complex, as pain arises from complex interactions among physical, social, and psychological stressors. It is possible that the psychological factor of cognitive dissonance may contribute to the etiology and/or maintenance of musculoskeletal disorders.

Method: MEDLINE, APA PsycInfo, and CINAHL Plus databases were searched for studies investigating cognitive dissonance or its related constructs as exposure(s) of interest and outcomes related to physical health (including, but not limited to, musculoskeletal pain). Risk of bias was assessed using the Appraisal tool for Cross-Sectional Studies (AXIS) tool.

Results: The literature search yielded 7 studies eligible for inclusion. None of the included studies investigated cognitive dissonance directly but instead investigated dissonance-related constructs of emotional dissonance and emotional labor, in which a mismatch between required and felt emotions might elicit a psychological response consistent with the cognitive dissonance state. Moderate effect sizes between dissonance-related constructs and musculoskeletal disorders were noted (OR 1.25-2.22).

Conclusion: There is likely a relationship between the two factors studied. However, as the included studies were cross-sectional in nature, a causal relationship between cognitive dissonance-related constructs and musculoskeletal disorders cannot be inferred. Therefore, future study proposing and validating a causal pathway between these variables is warranted.

Application: Cognitive dissonance and its related constructs may serve as risk factors for musculoskeletal disorders that have not been considered previously.

认知失调状态与肌肉骨骼损伤之间的潜在关系:系统回顾
目的:本系统综述旨在研究认知失调或其相关概念(情绪失调、情绪劳动)与肌肉骨骼疾病之间的潜在联系:本系统综述旨在研究认知失调或其相关概念(情绪失调、情绪劳动)与肌肉骨骼疾病之间的潜在联系:背景:肌肉骨骼疾病的病因很复杂,因为疼痛是由身体、社会和心理压力之间复杂的相互作用引起的。认知失调这一心理因素可能是肌肉骨骼疾病的病因和/或维持因素:方法:在 MEDLINE、APA PsycInfo 和 CINAHL Plus 数据库中搜索了有关认知失调或其相关结构的研究,并将其作为相关暴露和与身体健康(包括但不限于肌肉骨骼疼痛)相关的结果。使用横断面研究评估工具(AXIS)对偏倚风险进行了评估:通过文献检索,有 7 项研究符合纳入条件。所纳入的研究均未直接调查认知失调,而是调查了与失调相关的情绪失调和情绪劳动结构,在情绪劳动结构中,要求的情绪和感受到的情绪之间的不匹配可能会引起与认知失调状态一致的心理反应。研究发现,失调相关结构与肌肉骨骼疾病之间存在中度效应大小(OR 1.25-2.22):结论:所研究的两个因素之间可能存在关系。然而,由于所纳入的研究均为横断面研究,因此无法推断认知失调相关因素与肌肉骨骼疾病之间的因果关系。因此,有必要在今后的研究中提出并验证这些变量之间的因果关系:应用:认知失调及其相关建构可能是导致肌肉骨骼疾病的风险因素,而这在以前尚未被考虑过。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Factors
Human Factors 管理科学-行为科学
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society publishes peer-reviewed scientific studies in human factors/ergonomics that present theoretical and practical advances concerning the relationship between people and technologies, tools, environments, and systems. Papers published in Human Factors leverage fundamental knowledge of human capabilities and limitations – and the basic understanding of cognitive, physical, behavioral, physiological, social, developmental, affective, and motivational aspects of human performance – to yield design principles; enhance training, selection, and communication; and ultimately improve human-system interfaces and sociotechnical systems that lead to safer and more effective outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信