Depression treatment and short-term healthcare expenditures among elderly Medicare beneficiaries with chronic physical conditions.

Chan Shen, Neel Shah, Patricia A Findley, Usha Sambamoorthi
{"title":"Depression treatment and short-term healthcare expenditures among elderly Medicare beneficiaries with chronic physical conditions.","authors":"Chan Shen,&nbsp;Neel Shah,&nbsp;Patricia A Findley,&nbsp;Usha Sambamoorthi","doi":"10.1186/1477-5751-12-15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research on the impact of depression treatment on expenditures is nascent and shows results that vary from negative associations with healthcare expenditures to increased expenditures. However many of these studies did not include psychotherapy as part of the depression treatment. None of these studies included \"no treatment\" as a comparison group. In addition, no study has included a broad group of chronic physical conditions in studying depression treatment expenditures.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We determined the association between depression treatment and short-term healthcare expenditures using a nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries with chronic physical conditions and depression.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, we examined the association between depression treatment in the baseline year and healthcare expenditures in the following year using data from 2000 through 2005 of the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS), a nationally representative survey of Medicare beneficiaries. Using the rotating panel design of MCBS, we derived five two-year cohorts: 2000-2001, 2001-2002, 2002-2003, 2003-2004, and 2004-2005. The study sample included 1,055 elderly Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 or over. We compared healthcare expenditures of no depression treatment group with depression treatment groups using t-tests. Linear regressions of log-transformed dollars were used to assess the relationship between depression treatment and healthcare expenditures after controlling for demographic, socio-economic, health status, lifestyle risk factors, year of observation and baseline expenditures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to no depression treatment ($16,795), the average total expenditures were higher for those who used antidepressants only ($17,425) and those who used psychotherapy with or without antidepressants ($19,733). After controlling for the independent variables, antidepressant use and psychotherapy with or without antidepressants were associated with 20.2% (95% CI: 14.1-26.7%) and 29.4% (95% CI: 18.8-41.0%) increase in total expenditures, respectively. We observed that depression treatment was positively associated with inpatient, medical provider and prescription drug expenditures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among the elderly Medicare beneficiaries with chronic physical conditions, depression treatment was associated with greater short-term healthcare expenditures. Future research needs to replicate these findings and also examine whether depression treatment reduces expenditures over a longer period of time.</p>","PeriodicalId":73849,"journal":{"name":"Journal of negative results in biomedicine","volume":" ","pages":"15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1477-5751-12-15","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of negative results in biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-5751-12-15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Background: Research on the impact of depression treatment on expenditures is nascent and shows results that vary from negative associations with healthcare expenditures to increased expenditures. However many of these studies did not include psychotherapy as part of the depression treatment. None of these studies included "no treatment" as a comparison group. In addition, no study has included a broad group of chronic physical conditions in studying depression treatment expenditures.

Objective: We determined the association between depression treatment and short-term healthcare expenditures using a nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries with chronic physical conditions and depression.

Method: In this retrospective cohort study, we examined the association between depression treatment in the baseline year and healthcare expenditures in the following year using data from 2000 through 2005 of the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS), a nationally representative survey of Medicare beneficiaries. Using the rotating panel design of MCBS, we derived five two-year cohorts: 2000-2001, 2001-2002, 2002-2003, 2003-2004, and 2004-2005. The study sample included 1,055 elderly Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 or over. We compared healthcare expenditures of no depression treatment group with depression treatment groups using t-tests. Linear regressions of log-transformed dollars were used to assess the relationship between depression treatment and healthcare expenditures after controlling for demographic, socio-economic, health status, lifestyle risk factors, year of observation and baseline expenditures.

Results: Compared to no depression treatment ($16,795), the average total expenditures were higher for those who used antidepressants only ($17,425) and those who used psychotherapy with or without antidepressants ($19,733). After controlling for the independent variables, antidepressant use and psychotherapy with or without antidepressants were associated with 20.2% (95% CI: 14.1-26.7%) and 29.4% (95% CI: 18.8-41.0%) increase in total expenditures, respectively. We observed that depression treatment was positively associated with inpatient, medical provider and prescription drug expenditures.

Conclusion: Among the elderly Medicare beneficiaries with chronic physical conditions, depression treatment was associated with greater short-term healthcare expenditures. Future research needs to replicate these findings and also examine whether depression treatment reduces expenditures over a longer period of time.

患有慢性身体疾病的老年医疗保险受益人的抑郁症治疗和短期医疗保健支出。
背景:关于抑郁症治疗对支出影响的研究是新生的,其结果从与医疗支出的负相关到与支出的增加不等。然而,许多研究并没有将心理治疗作为抑郁症治疗的一部分。这些研究都没有将“不治疗”作为对照组。此外,没有一项研究在研究抑郁症治疗费用时纳入了广泛的慢性身体状况。目的:我们确定抑郁症治疗与短期医疗保健支出之间的关系,使用具有全国代表性的慢性身体状况和抑郁症的医疗保险受益人样本。方法:在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们使用2000 - 2005年医疗保险受益人调查(MCBS)的数据,研究了基准年的抑郁症治疗与次年医疗保健支出之间的关系,MCBS是一项全国代表性的医疗保险受益人调查。使用MCBS的轮换面板设计,我们导出了5个2年期队列:2000-2001年、2001-2002年、2002-2003年、2003-2004年和2004-2005年。研究样本包括1055名65岁或以上的老年医疗保险受益人。我们用t检验比较了未治疗抑郁症组和治疗抑郁症组的医疗费用。在控制了人口统计学、社会经济、健康状况、生活方式风险因素、观察年份和基线支出后,采用对数转换美元的线性回归来评估抑郁症治疗与医疗保健支出之间的关系。结果:与没有抑郁症治疗(16,795美元)相比,仅使用抗抑郁药物的患者(17,425美元)和使用或不使用抗抑郁药物的心理治疗患者(19,733美元)的平均总支出更高。在控制了自变量后,抗抑郁药的使用和有或没有抗抑郁药的心理治疗分别与总支出增加20.2% (95% CI: 14.1-26.7%)和29.4% (95% CI: 18.8-41.0%)相关。我们观察到抑郁症治疗与住院病人、医疗提供者和处方药支出呈正相关。结论:在患有慢性身体疾病的老年医疗保险受益人中,抑郁症治疗与较大的短期医疗保健支出相关。未来的研究需要重复这些发现,并检查抑郁症治疗是否能在较长一段时间内减少支出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信