Measuring workplace psychosocial factors in the federal government.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ann-Renée Blais, Isabelle Michaud, Jean-François Simard, Lenka Mach, Simon Houle
{"title":"Measuring workplace psychosocial factors in the federal government.","authors":"Ann-Renée Blais,&nbsp;Isabelle Michaud,&nbsp;Jean-François Simard,&nbsp;Lenka Mach,&nbsp;Simon Houle","doi":"10.25318/82-003-x202101200001-eng","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The National Standard of Canada for Psychological Health and Safety in the Workplace (the Standard) identifies 13 psychosocial factors affecting psychological health and safety in the workplace that employers should measure and monitor with the goal of addressing areas for improvement. The present study sought to determine the suitability of the Public Service Employee Survey as a tool for the assessment of these psychosocial factors in public service employees. It also aimed to explore-in a preliminary manner-predictors of job satisfaction in these employees.</p><p><strong>Data and methods: </strong>Data from the 2017 and 2019 Public Service Employee Survey (PSES) were analyzed. Specifically, exploratory structural modelling and tests of measurement invariance were used to identify a measurement model reflecting the psychosocial factors outlined in the Standard and to evaluate the equivalence of this model across both PSES administrations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analyses uncovered 10 of the 13 psychosocial factors, as well as 2 closely related factors-diversity and inclusion-and supported the full invariance of the resulting measurement model across both PSES administrations. Lastly, preliminary results pointed to recognition and reward (encompassing leader reward behaviours) and involvement and influence (touching on participative decision making, innovation and initiative) as predictors of job satisfaction in both samples of public service employees.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The present study identified the PSES as a tool for the assessment-in public service employees-of the majority of the psychosocial factors outlined in the Standard as well as two additional factors of particular importance to the federal government, diversity and inclusion. Future research to address current limitations is discussed, as are preliminary implications for practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":49196,"journal":{"name":"Health Reports","volume":"32 12","pages":"3-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25318/82-003-x202101200001-eng","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The National Standard of Canada for Psychological Health and Safety in the Workplace (the Standard) identifies 13 psychosocial factors affecting psychological health and safety in the workplace that employers should measure and monitor with the goal of addressing areas for improvement. The present study sought to determine the suitability of the Public Service Employee Survey as a tool for the assessment of these psychosocial factors in public service employees. It also aimed to explore-in a preliminary manner-predictors of job satisfaction in these employees.

Data and methods: Data from the 2017 and 2019 Public Service Employee Survey (PSES) were analyzed. Specifically, exploratory structural modelling and tests of measurement invariance were used to identify a measurement model reflecting the psychosocial factors outlined in the Standard and to evaluate the equivalence of this model across both PSES administrations.

Results: The analyses uncovered 10 of the 13 psychosocial factors, as well as 2 closely related factors-diversity and inclusion-and supported the full invariance of the resulting measurement model across both PSES administrations. Lastly, preliminary results pointed to recognition and reward (encompassing leader reward behaviours) and involvement and influence (touching on participative decision making, innovation and initiative) as predictors of job satisfaction in both samples of public service employees.

Interpretation: The present study identified the PSES as a tool for the assessment-in public service employees-of the majority of the psychosocial factors outlined in the Standard as well as two additional factors of particular importance to the federal government, diversity and inclusion. Future research to address current limitations is discussed, as are preliminary implications for practice.

测量联邦政府工作场所的社会心理因素。
背景:《加拿大工作场所心理健康和安全国家标准》(《标准》)确定了影响工作场所心理健康和安全的13个社会心理因素,雇主应衡量和监测这些因素,以解决需要改进的领域。本研究试图确定公共服务雇员调查作为评估公共服务雇员这些社会心理因素的工具的适用性。它还旨在初步探索这些员工工作满意度的预测因素。数据与方法:对2017年和2019年公共服务人员调查(pse)数据进行分析。具体而言,探索性结构建模和测量不变性测试用于确定反映标准中概述的社会心理因素的测量模型,并评估该模型在两个pse管理部门之间的等效性。结果:分析揭示了13个社会心理因素中的10个,以及2个密切相关的因素——多样性和包容性——并支持了结果测量模型在两个pse管理部门之间的完全不变性。最后,初步结果指出,在两个公共服务雇员样本中,认可和奖励(包括领导者奖励行为)以及参与和影响(涉及参与性决策、创新和主动性)是工作满意度的预测因素。解释:本研究确定了社会心理评估量表作为一种工具,用于评估标准中列出的大多数公共服务雇员的社会心理因素,以及对联邦政府特别重要的两个额外因素,多样性和包容性。讨论了解决当前局限性的未来研究,以及对实践的初步影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Reports
Health Reports PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
4.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Health Reports publishes original research on diverse topics related to understanding and improving the health of populations and the delivery of health care. We publish studies based on analyses of Canadian national/provincial representative surveys or Canadian national/provincial administrative databases, as well as results of international comparative health research. Health Reports encourages the sharing of methodological information among those engaged in the analysis of health surveys or administrative databases. Use of the most current data available is advised for all submissions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信