Effects of Systemic Propranolol Application on the New Bone Formation in Periimplant Guided Bone Regeneration.

IF 1 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
eJournal of Oral Maxillofacial Research Pub Date : 2021-09-30 eCollection Date: 2021-07-01 DOI:10.5037/jomr.2021.12302
Nedim Gunes, Mehmet Gül, Serkan Dundar, Gokhan Artas, Mehmet Ali Kobat, Samet Tekin, Alihan Bozoglan, Abulfaz Isayev
{"title":"Effects of Systemic Propranolol Application on the New Bone Formation in Periimplant Guided Bone Regeneration.","authors":"Nedim Gunes,&nbsp;Mehmet Gül,&nbsp;Serkan Dundar,&nbsp;Gokhan Artas,&nbsp;Mehmet Ali Kobat,&nbsp;Samet Tekin,&nbsp;Alihan Bozoglan,&nbsp;Abulfaz Isayev","doi":"10.5037/jomr.2021.12302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this experimental animal study was to evaluate the effects of systemic propranolol on new bone formation in peri-implant bone defects.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Implant slots were created 4mm long and 2.5 mm wide. After the titanium implants were placed in the sockets, 2 mm defects were created in the neck of the implants. Bone grafts were placed in these defects. Then the rats were randomly divided into three equal groups: control (n = 8), propranolol dose-1 (PRP-1) (n = 8), and propranolol dose-2 (PRP-2) (n = 8) groups. In the control group, the rats received no further treatment during the eight-week experimental period after the surgery. The rats in the PRP-1 and PRP-2 groups were given 5 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg propranolol, respectively, every three days for the eight-week experimental period after the surgery. At the end of the experimental period, the rats were euthanized. Blood serum was collected for biochemical analysis, and the implants and surrounding bone tissues were used for the histological analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in the histological analysis results and the biochemical parameters (alkaline phosphatase, calcium, creatinine and phosphorus) of the groups (P > 0.05). Also, in the test groups, there was numerically but not statistically more new bone formation detected compared with the controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Within the limitations of this study, propranolol did not affect the new bone formation in peri-implant defects.</p>","PeriodicalId":53254,"journal":{"name":"eJournal of Oral Maxillofacial Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ce/3d/jomr-12-e2.PMC8577584.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"eJournal of Oral Maxillofacial Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2021.12302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this experimental animal study was to evaluate the effects of systemic propranolol on new bone formation in peri-implant bone defects.

Material and methods: Implant slots were created 4mm long and 2.5 mm wide. After the titanium implants were placed in the sockets, 2 mm defects were created in the neck of the implants. Bone grafts were placed in these defects. Then the rats were randomly divided into three equal groups: control (n = 8), propranolol dose-1 (PRP-1) (n = 8), and propranolol dose-2 (PRP-2) (n = 8) groups. In the control group, the rats received no further treatment during the eight-week experimental period after the surgery. The rats in the PRP-1 and PRP-2 groups were given 5 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg propranolol, respectively, every three days for the eight-week experimental period after the surgery. At the end of the experimental period, the rats were euthanized. Blood serum was collected for biochemical analysis, and the implants and surrounding bone tissues were used for the histological analysis.

Results: There were no significant differences in the histological analysis results and the biochemical parameters (alkaline phosphatase, calcium, creatinine and phosphorus) of the groups (P > 0.05). Also, in the test groups, there was numerically but not statistically more new bone formation detected compared with the controls.

Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, propranolol did not affect the new bone formation in peri-implant defects.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

普萘洛尔对种植体周围引导骨再生中新骨形成的影响。
目的:本实验动物研究的目的是评估全身心得安对种植体周围骨缺损新生骨形成的影响。材料和方法:种植槽长4mm,宽2.5 mm。将钛植入体置入牙槽后,植入体颈部产生2mm的缺损。在这些缺损处放置骨移植物。将大鼠随机分为对照组(n = 8)、普萘洛尔剂量1组(n = 8)、普萘洛尔剂量2组(n = 8)。对照组大鼠在术后8周实验期内不接受进一步治疗。PRP-1组和PRP-2组大鼠分别给予5 mg/kg和10 mg/kg心得安,每3天给予1次,为期8周的实验期。实验结束时,对大鼠实施安乐死。采集血清进行生化分析,种植体及周围骨组织进行组织学分析。结果:各组组织学分析结果及生化指标(碱性磷酸酶、钙、肌酐、磷)差异均无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。此外,在实验组中,与对照组相比,检测到的新骨形成在数字上(而不是统计上)更多。结论:在本研究的限制范围内,心得安对种植体周围缺损的新骨形成没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信