Empagliflozin in the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in addition to background therapies and therapeutic combinations (EMPEROR-Reduced): a post-hoc analysis of a randomised, double-blind trial.

The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-11-30 DOI:10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00292-8
Subodh Verma, Nitish K Dhingra, Javed Butler, Stefan D Anker, Joao Pedro Ferreira, Gerasimos Filippatos, James L Januzzi, Carolyn S P Lam, Naveed Sattar, Barbara Peil, Matias Nordaby, Martina Brueckmann, Stuart J Pocock, Faiez Zannad, Milton Packer
{"title":"Empagliflozin in the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in addition to background therapies and therapeutic combinations (EMPEROR-Reduced): a post-hoc analysis of a randomised, double-blind trial.","authors":"Subodh Verma,&nbsp;Nitish K Dhingra,&nbsp;Javed Butler,&nbsp;Stefan D Anker,&nbsp;Joao Pedro Ferreira,&nbsp;Gerasimos Filippatos,&nbsp;James L Januzzi,&nbsp;Carolyn S P Lam,&nbsp;Naveed Sattar,&nbsp;Barbara Peil,&nbsp;Matias Nordaby,&nbsp;Martina Brueckmann,&nbsp;Stuart J Pocock,&nbsp;Faiez Zannad,&nbsp;Milton Packer","doi":"10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00292-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is important to evaluate whether a new treatment for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) provides additive benefit to background foundational treatments. As such, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of empagliflozin in patients with HFrEF in addition to baseline treatment with specific doses and combinations of disease-modifying therapies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a post-hoc analysis of the EMPEROR-Reduced randomised, double-blind, parallel-group trial, which took place in 520 centres (hospitals and medical clinics) in 20 countries in Asia, Australia, Europe, North America, and South America. Patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification II-IV with an ejection fraction of 40% or less were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive the addition of either oral empagliflozin 10 mg per day or placebo to background therapy. The primary composite outcome was cardiovascular death and heart failure hospitalisation; the secondary outcome was total heart failure hospital admissions. An extended composite outcome consisted of inpatient and outpatient HFrEF events was also evaluated. Outcomes were analysed according to background use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) or angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs), as well as β blockers and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) at less than 50% or 50% or more of target doses and in various combinations. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03057977.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>In this post-hoc analysis of 3730 patients (mean age 66·8 years [SD 11·0], 893 [23·9%] women; 1863 [49·9%] in the empagliflozin group, 1867 [50·1%] in the placebo group) assessed between March 6, 2017, and May 28, 2020, empagliflozin reduced the risk of the primary outcome (361 in 1863 participants in the empagliflozin group and 462 of 1867 in the placebo group; HR 0·75 [95% CI 0·65-0·86]) regardless of background therapy or its target doses for ACE inhibitors or ARBs at doses of less than 50% of the target dose (HR 0·85 [0·69-1·06]) and for doses of 50% or more of the target dose (HR 0·67 [0·52-0·88]; p<sub>interaction</sub>=0·18). A similar result was seen for β blockers at doses of less than 50% of the target dose (HR 0·66 [0·54-0·80]) and for doses of 50% or more of the target dose (HR 0·81 [0·66-1·00]; p<sub>interaction</sub>=0·15). Empagliflozin also reduced the risk of the primary outcome irrespective of background use of triple therapy with an ACE inhibitor, ARB, or ARNI plus β blocker plus MRA (given combination HR 0·73 [0·61-0·88]; not given combination HR 0·76 [0·62-0·94]; p<sub>interaction</sub>=0·77). Similar patterns of benefit were observed for the secondary and extended composite outcomes. Empagliflozin was well tolerated and rates of hypotension, symptomatic hypotension, and hyperkalaemia were similar across all subgroups.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Empagliflozin reduced serious heart failure outcomes across doses and combinations of disease-modifying therapies for HFrEF. Clinically, these data suggest that empagliflozin might be considered as a foundational therapy in patients with HFrEF regardless of their existing background therapy.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Boehringer Ingelheim and Eli Lilly and Company.</p>","PeriodicalId":519532,"journal":{"name":"The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology","volume":" ","pages":"35-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00292-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/11/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

Background: It is important to evaluate whether a new treatment for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) provides additive benefit to background foundational treatments. As such, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of empagliflozin in patients with HFrEF in addition to baseline treatment with specific doses and combinations of disease-modifying therapies.

Methods: We performed a post-hoc analysis of the EMPEROR-Reduced randomised, double-blind, parallel-group trial, which took place in 520 centres (hospitals and medical clinics) in 20 countries in Asia, Australia, Europe, North America, and South America. Patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification II-IV with an ejection fraction of 40% or less were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive the addition of either oral empagliflozin 10 mg per day or placebo to background therapy. The primary composite outcome was cardiovascular death and heart failure hospitalisation; the secondary outcome was total heart failure hospital admissions. An extended composite outcome consisted of inpatient and outpatient HFrEF events was also evaluated. Outcomes were analysed according to background use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) or angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs), as well as β blockers and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) at less than 50% or 50% or more of target doses and in various combinations. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03057977.

Findings: In this post-hoc analysis of 3730 patients (mean age 66·8 years [SD 11·0], 893 [23·9%] women; 1863 [49·9%] in the empagliflozin group, 1867 [50·1%] in the placebo group) assessed between March 6, 2017, and May 28, 2020, empagliflozin reduced the risk of the primary outcome (361 in 1863 participants in the empagliflozin group and 462 of 1867 in the placebo group; HR 0·75 [95% CI 0·65-0·86]) regardless of background therapy or its target doses for ACE inhibitors or ARBs at doses of less than 50% of the target dose (HR 0·85 [0·69-1·06]) and for doses of 50% or more of the target dose (HR 0·67 [0·52-0·88]; pinteraction=0·18). A similar result was seen for β blockers at doses of less than 50% of the target dose (HR 0·66 [0·54-0·80]) and for doses of 50% or more of the target dose (HR 0·81 [0·66-1·00]; pinteraction=0·15). Empagliflozin also reduced the risk of the primary outcome irrespective of background use of triple therapy with an ACE inhibitor, ARB, or ARNI plus β blocker plus MRA (given combination HR 0·73 [0·61-0·88]; not given combination HR 0·76 [0·62-0·94]; pinteraction=0·77). Similar patterns of benefit were observed for the secondary and extended composite outcomes. Empagliflozin was well tolerated and rates of hypotension, symptomatic hypotension, and hyperkalaemia were similar across all subgroups.

Interpretation: Empagliflozin reduced serious heart failure outcomes across doses and combinations of disease-modifying therapies for HFrEF. Clinically, these data suggest that empagliflozin might be considered as a foundational therapy in patients with HFrEF regardless of their existing background therapy.

Funding: Boehringer Ingelheim and Eli Lilly and Company.

恩格列净在背景疗法和治疗组合(EMPEROR-Reduced)之外治疗射血分数降低的心力衰竭:一项随机、双盲试验的事后分析
背景:评估一种新的治疗心力衰竭伴射血分数降低(HFrEF)的方法是否能为背景基础治疗提供额外的益处是很重要的。因此,我们的目的是评估恩格列净在HFrEF患者中的疗效和安全性,以及使用特定剂量和疾病改善疗法组合进行基线治疗。方法:我们对在亚洲、澳大利亚、欧洲、北美和南美20个国家的520个中心(医院和诊所)进行的EMPEROR-Reduced随机、双盲、平行组试验进行了事后分析。纽约心脏协会(NYHA) II-IV级射血分数为40%或更低的患者被随机分配(1:1),接受背景治疗中每天口服恩格列净10mg或安慰剂。主要综合结局为心血管死亡和心力衰竭住院;次要结局是心力衰竭住院。还评估了包括住院和门诊HFrEF事件的扩展复合结果。结果根据血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂、血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂(ARBs)或血管紧张素受体nepryysin抑制剂(ARNIs)以及β受体阻滞剂和矿皮质激素受体拮抗剂(MRAs)的背景使用情况进行分析,剂量低于目标剂量的50%或50%或更多,并以各种组合使用。本研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,编号NCT03057977。结果:在3730例患者(平均年龄66.8岁[SD 11.0])的事后分析中,893例[23.9%]女性;在2017年3月6日至2020年5月28日期间评估的empagliflozin组1863名患者(49.9%),安慰剂组1867名患者(50.1%),empagliflozin降低了主要结局的风险(1863名参与者中有361名是empagliflozin组,1867名参与者中有462名是安慰剂组;当ACE抑制剂或arb的剂量小于目标剂量的50% (HR 0.85[0.69 - 1.06])和目标剂量的50%或以上(HR 0.67[0.52 - 0.88])时,无论背景治疗或其目标剂量如何(HR 0.75 [95% CI 0.65 - 0.86]);pinteraction = 0·18)。β受体阻滞剂在剂量小于目标剂量的50% (HR 0.66[0.54 - 0.80])和目标剂量的50%或以上(HR 0.81[0.66 - 0.00])时也有类似的结果;pinteraction = 0·15)。恩帕列净也降低了主要结局的风险,无论背景使用ACE抑制剂、ARB或ARNI + β受体阻滞剂+ MRA的三联疗法(给予联合HR 0.73 [0.61 - 0.88];未给药组HR为0.76 [0.62 ~ 0.94];pinteraction = 0·77)。在次要和扩展的综合结果中观察到类似的获益模式。恩帕列净耐受性良好,低血压、症状性低血压和高钾血症的发生率在所有亚组中相似。解释:恩格列净在HFrEF的治疗剂量和治疗组合中降低了严重心力衰竭的结局。在临床上,这些数据表明,恩格列净可能被认为是HFrEF患者的基础治疗,而不管他们现有的背景治疗。融资:勃林格殷格翰公司和礼来公司。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信