Development, Implementation, and Evaluation of an Early Mobility Protocol in a Regional Level II Trauma Center.

IF 1 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Catherine A McCarty, Colleen M Renier, Pat G Conway, Linda Vogel, Theo A Woehrle, Leslie A Anderson, Eric J Hanson, Lisa M Benrud, Mary Gerchman-Smith
{"title":"Development, Implementation, and Evaluation of an Early Mobility Protocol in a Regional Level II Trauma Center.","authors":"Catherine A McCarty,&nbsp;Colleen M Renier,&nbsp;Pat G Conway,&nbsp;Linda Vogel,&nbsp;Theo A Woehrle,&nbsp;Leslie A Anderson,&nbsp;Eric J Hanson,&nbsp;Lisa M Benrud,&nbsp;Mary Gerchman-Smith","doi":"10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this project was to develop and evaluate a collaborative nursing/therapist protocol for early mobility in a medical-surgical intensive care unit (MICU) in a regional level II trauma center. Data for patients in the MICU were compared for the periods August 3, 2015-August 2, 2016, and August 3, 2014-August 2, 2015. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 10 nurses and 1 therapist. Average MICU length of stay decreased from 3.81 to 3.50 days (P = .057). Mean time in mobility chairs did not change (0.12 days vs 0.11 days, P = .389). Mean number of days to first documented level 2-5 activity decreased significantly, from 1.81 to 1.51 days (P = .036). The percentage of hospitalizations with any documented level 3 or 4 activity increased significantly (from 3.8% to 7.4% and from 61.5% to 66.7%, P = .003 and P = .031, respectively). Barriers/challenges to implementation included having enough people to assist, space, documentation, having to coax the physician to place order for upright mobility, availability of therapists for later stages of protocol, patient variability, fear of patient falls, availability of therapy chairs, staff changes, time, and patient refusal. A multidisciplinary approach to protocol development for early mobility in an intensive care unit was successfully implemented at a regional level II trauma center.</p>","PeriodicalId":10789,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Nursing Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Nursing Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000391","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this project was to develop and evaluate a collaborative nursing/therapist protocol for early mobility in a medical-surgical intensive care unit (MICU) in a regional level II trauma center. Data for patients in the MICU were compared for the periods August 3, 2015-August 2, 2016, and August 3, 2014-August 2, 2015. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 10 nurses and 1 therapist. Average MICU length of stay decreased from 3.81 to 3.50 days (P = .057). Mean time in mobility chairs did not change (0.12 days vs 0.11 days, P = .389). Mean number of days to first documented level 2-5 activity decreased significantly, from 1.81 to 1.51 days (P = .036). The percentage of hospitalizations with any documented level 3 or 4 activity increased significantly (from 3.8% to 7.4% and from 61.5% to 66.7%, P = .003 and P = .031, respectively). Barriers/challenges to implementation included having enough people to assist, space, documentation, having to coax the physician to place order for upright mobility, availability of therapists for later stages of protocol, patient variability, fear of patient falls, availability of therapy chairs, staff changes, time, and patient refusal. A multidisciplinary approach to protocol development for early mobility in an intensive care unit was successfully implemented at a regional level II trauma center.

区域二级创伤中心早期活动能力方案的制定、实施和评估。
该项目的目的是制定和评估区域二级创伤中心内科-外科重症监护病房(MICU)早期行动的协作护理/治疗师方案。比较2015年8月3日- 2016年8月2日和2014年8月3日- 2015年8月2日期间MICU患者的数据。对10名护士和1名治疗师进行半结构化访谈。平均住院天数由3.81天降至3.50天(P = 0.057)。在活动椅上的平均时间没有变化(0.12天vs 0.11天,P = 0.389)。首次记录2-5级活动的平均天数显著减少,从1.81天减少到1.51天(P = 0.036)。任何记录的3级或4级活动的住院比例显著增加(分别从3.8%增加到7.4%和从61.5%增加到66.7%,P = 0.003和P = 0.031)。实施的障碍/挑战包括有足够的人员协助、空间、文件、必须哄哄医生下直立活动的订单、方案后期是否有治疗师、患者的可变性、对患者跌倒的恐惧、是否有治疗椅、工作人员更换、时间和患者拒绝。在一个地区二级创伤中心成功实施了一种多学科方法来制定重症监护病房早期活动的方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical Care Nursing Quarterly
Critical Care Nursing Quarterly CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
期刊介绍: Critical Care Nursing Quarterly (CCNQ) is a peer-reviewed journal that provides current practice-oriented information for the continuing education and improved clinical practice of critical care professionals, including nurses, physicians, and allied health care professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信