A New Patient Acuity Tool to Support Equitable Patient Assignments in a Progressive Care Unit.

IF 1 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Debra Eastman, Kristine Kernan
{"title":"A New Patient Acuity Tool to Support Equitable Patient Assignments in a Progressive Care Unit.","authors":"Debra Eastman,&nbsp;Kristine Kernan","doi":"10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Making fair and equitable staffing decisions and patient assignments created complexities and undue nursing dissatisfaction on a 20-bed progressive care unit. Common themes shared by the nursing staff included inadequate staffing ratios, increased workload, and unease for patient safety. On the basis of these concerns, a unit-based needs assessment provided insight into what perceived and actual barriers exist preventing nurses from providing excellent care. Information gathered helped determine what could be done to overcome some barriers, and performing a comprehensive unit profile assessment allowed for better insight into how the unit was currently functioning. A comprehensive review of literature was undertaken to examine articles related to patient acuity utilizing the electronic databases CINAHL, PubMed, and MEDLINE. Key words and phrases included the following: acuity, patient acuity, acuity tools, progressive care acuity, nurse-patient assignment, workload, nursing assignments, and equitable staffing. Utilizing the results of the nurse survey, and information gained from articles gathered during the literature review, a patient acuity tool was created. The tool was believed to be an accurate representation of the patients' acuity, and the majority of charge nurses reported that they utilized the patient acuity tool score when making nurse-patient assignments. Overall staff satisfaction and perceptions of nurse-patient assignment equity were improved.</p>","PeriodicalId":10789,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Nursing Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Nursing Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000388","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Making fair and equitable staffing decisions and patient assignments created complexities and undue nursing dissatisfaction on a 20-bed progressive care unit. Common themes shared by the nursing staff included inadequate staffing ratios, increased workload, and unease for patient safety. On the basis of these concerns, a unit-based needs assessment provided insight into what perceived and actual barriers exist preventing nurses from providing excellent care. Information gathered helped determine what could be done to overcome some barriers, and performing a comprehensive unit profile assessment allowed for better insight into how the unit was currently functioning. A comprehensive review of literature was undertaken to examine articles related to patient acuity utilizing the electronic databases CINAHL, PubMed, and MEDLINE. Key words and phrases included the following: acuity, patient acuity, acuity tools, progressive care acuity, nurse-patient assignment, workload, nursing assignments, and equitable staffing. Utilizing the results of the nurse survey, and information gained from articles gathered during the literature review, a patient acuity tool was created. The tool was believed to be an accurate representation of the patients' acuity, and the majority of charge nurses reported that they utilized the patient acuity tool score when making nurse-patient assignments. Overall staff satisfaction and perceptions of nurse-patient assignment equity were improved.

一个新的病人敏锐度工具,以支持公平的病人分配在一个渐进的护理单位。
在一个20张床位的渐进护理单元中,做出公平和公平的人员配置决定和患者分配造成了复杂性和过度的护理不满。护理人员的共同主题包括人员配备比例不足、工作量增加以及对患者安全的不安。在这些问题的基础上,以单位为基础的需求评估深入了解了阻碍护士提供优质护理的感知和实际障碍。收集的信息有助于确定如何克服一些障碍,并且执行全面的单元概况评估可以更好地了解单元当前的运行情况。利用电子数据库CINAHL、PubMed和MEDLINE对文献进行全面的回顾,检查与患者视力相关的文章。关键词和短语包括:视力,患者视力,视力工具,渐进式护理视力,护士-患者分配,工作量,护理分配和公平的人员配置。利用护士调查的结果和从文献综述中收集的文章中获得的信息,创建了一个患者敏锐度工具。该工具被认为是患者敏锐度的准确代表,大多数主管护士报告说,他们在进行护士-患者分配时使用了患者敏锐度工具评分。整体员工满意度和对护士-病人分配公平的看法得到改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical Care Nursing Quarterly
Critical Care Nursing Quarterly CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
期刊介绍: Critical Care Nursing Quarterly (CCNQ) is a peer-reviewed journal that provides current practice-oriented information for the continuing education and improved clinical practice of critical care professionals, including nurses, physicians, and allied health care professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信