Immigration Policy Mismatches and Counterproductive Outcomes: Unauthorized Migration to the U.S. in Two Eras.

IF 4.3 2区 社会学 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY
Comparative Migration Studies Pub Date : 2020-01-01 Epub Date: 2020-06-25 DOI:10.1186/s40878-020-00181-6
Douglas S Massey
{"title":"Immigration Policy Mismatches and Counterproductive Outcomes: Unauthorized Migration to the U.S. in Two Eras.","authors":"Douglas S Massey","doi":"10.1186/s40878-020-00181-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The world appears to be moving into a new era of international migration during which gaps between policies needed to manage migratory flows and those enacted in practice will widen. Whereas immigrants in the late 20th century were motivated by a desire to improve their wellbeing by accessing opportunities in richer countries, in the early 21st century they are increasingly motivated by a desire to escape threats at places of origin, yielding very different patterns of migration and selectivity. Using the United States as an example, this paper reviews how mismatches between the underlying realities of international migration and the policies adopted to manage them, in both eras have produced and continue to produce dysfunctional outcomes. Although deleterious policy outcomes might be avoided in the future by combining a well-grounded conceptual understanding of the forces producing immigration with a clear statement of the goals to be achieved through specific policy interventions, the avoidance of further dysfunctional outcomes is unlikely to be achieved in an age of rising populism, disinformation, and xenophobia.</p>","PeriodicalId":37051,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Migration Studies","volume":"8 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8547794/pdf/nihms-1744909.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Migration Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-020-00181-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The world appears to be moving into a new era of international migration during which gaps between policies needed to manage migratory flows and those enacted in practice will widen. Whereas immigrants in the late 20th century were motivated by a desire to improve their wellbeing by accessing opportunities in richer countries, in the early 21st century they are increasingly motivated by a desire to escape threats at places of origin, yielding very different patterns of migration and selectivity. Using the United States as an example, this paper reviews how mismatches between the underlying realities of international migration and the policies adopted to manage them, in both eras have produced and continue to produce dysfunctional outcomes. Although deleterious policy outcomes might be avoided in the future by combining a well-grounded conceptual understanding of the forces producing immigration with a clear statement of the goals to be achieved through specific policy interventions, the avoidance of further dysfunctional outcomes is unlikely to be achieved in an age of rising populism, disinformation, and xenophobia.

移民政策不匹配与适得其反的结果:两个时代的美国非法移民》。
世界似乎正在步入一个新的国际移民时代,在这个时代,管理移民潮所需的政策与实际制定的政策之间的差距将会扩大。20 世纪末,移民的动机是希望通过获得富裕国家的机会来改善自己的福利,而 21 世纪初,移民的动机越来越多地是为了逃避原籍地的威胁,这就产生了截然不同的移民模式和选择性。本文以美国为例,回顾了在这两个时代,国际移民的基本现实与为管理移民而采取的政策之间的不匹配是如何产生并继续产生功能失调的结果的。尽管未来可以通过对移民力量的概念性理解和对通过具体政策干预所要实现的目标的清晰阐述来避免有害的政策结果,但在民粹主义、虚假信息和仇外心理日益盛行的时代,避免进一步的功能失调结果是不太可能实现的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Comparative Migration Studies
Comparative Migration Studies Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
8.60%
发文量
47
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信