Outcomes of digoxin vs. beta blocker in atrial fibrillation: report from ESC-EHRA EORP AF Long-Term General Registry.

Wern Yew Ding, Giuseppe Boriani, Francisco Marin, Carina Blomström-Lundqvist, Tatjana S Potpara, Laurent Fauchier, Gregory Y H Lip
{"title":"Outcomes of digoxin vs. beta blocker in atrial fibrillation: report from ESC-EHRA EORP AF Long-Term General Registry.","authors":"Wern Yew Ding,&nbsp;Giuseppe Boriani,&nbsp;Francisco Marin,&nbsp;Carina Blomström-Lundqvist,&nbsp;Tatjana S Potpara,&nbsp;Laurent Fauchier,&nbsp;Gregory Y H Lip","doi":"10.1093/ehjcvp/pvab076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The safety of digoxin therapy in atrial fibrillation (AF) remains ill-defined. We aimed to evaluate the effects of digoxin over beta-blocker therapy in AF.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Patients with AF who were treated with either digoxin or a beta blocker from the ESC-EHRA EORP AF (European Society of Cardiology-European Heart Rhythm Association EURObservational Research Programme Atrial Fibrillation) General Long-Term Registry were included. Outcomes of interest were all-cause mortality, cardiovascular (CV) mortality, non-CV mortality, quality of life, and number of patients with unplanned hospitalizations. Of 6377 patients, 549 (8.6%) were treated with digoxin. Over 24 months, there were 550 (8.6%) all-cause mortality events and 1304 (23.6%) patients with unplanned emergency hospitalizations. Compared to beta blocker, digoxin therapy was associated with increased all-cause mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 1.90 (95% confidence interval, CI, 1.48-2.44)], CV mortality [HR 2.18 (95% CI 1.47-3.21)], and non-CV mortality [HR 1.68 (95% CI 1.02-2.75)] with reduced quality of life [health utility score 0.555 (±0.406) vs. 0.705 (±0.346), P < 0.001] but no differences in emergency hospitalizations [HR 1.00 (95% CI 0.56-1.80)] or AF-related hospitalizations [HR 0.95 (95% CI 0.60-1.52)]. On multivariable analysis, there were no differences in any of the outcomes between both groups, after accounting for potential confounders. Similar results were obtained in the subgroups of patients with permanent AF and coexisting heart failure. There were no differences in outcomes between AF patients receiving digoxin with and without chronic kidney disease.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Poor outcomes related to the use of digoxin over beta-blocker therapy in terms of excess mortality and reduced quality of life are associated with the presence of other risk factors rather than digoxin per se. The choice of digoxin or beta-blocker therapy had no influence on the incidence of unplanned hospitalizations.</p>","PeriodicalId":11995,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal — Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"372-382"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal — Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjcvp/pvab076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aims: The safety of digoxin therapy in atrial fibrillation (AF) remains ill-defined. We aimed to evaluate the effects of digoxin over beta-blocker therapy in AF.

Methods and results: Patients with AF who were treated with either digoxin or a beta blocker from the ESC-EHRA EORP AF (European Society of Cardiology-European Heart Rhythm Association EURObservational Research Programme Atrial Fibrillation) General Long-Term Registry were included. Outcomes of interest were all-cause mortality, cardiovascular (CV) mortality, non-CV mortality, quality of life, and number of patients with unplanned hospitalizations. Of 6377 patients, 549 (8.6%) were treated with digoxin. Over 24 months, there were 550 (8.6%) all-cause mortality events and 1304 (23.6%) patients with unplanned emergency hospitalizations. Compared to beta blocker, digoxin therapy was associated with increased all-cause mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 1.90 (95% confidence interval, CI, 1.48-2.44)], CV mortality [HR 2.18 (95% CI 1.47-3.21)], and non-CV mortality [HR 1.68 (95% CI 1.02-2.75)] with reduced quality of life [health utility score 0.555 (±0.406) vs. 0.705 (±0.346), P < 0.001] but no differences in emergency hospitalizations [HR 1.00 (95% CI 0.56-1.80)] or AF-related hospitalizations [HR 0.95 (95% CI 0.60-1.52)]. On multivariable analysis, there were no differences in any of the outcomes between both groups, after accounting for potential confounders. Similar results were obtained in the subgroups of patients with permanent AF and coexisting heart failure. There were no differences in outcomes between AF patients receiving digoxin with and without chronic kidney disease.

Conclusion: Poor outcomes related to the use of digoxin over beta-blocker therapy in terms of excess mortality and reduced quality of life are associated with the presence of other risk factors rather than digoxin per se. The choice of digoxin or beta-blocker therapy had no influence on the incidence of unplanned hospitalizations.

地高辛与-受体阻滞剂治疗房颤的结果:ESC-EHRA EORP AF长期一般登记报告
目的:地高辛治疗心房颤动(AF)的安全性仍不明确。我们的目的是评估地高辛与β受体阻滞剂治疗心房颤动的疗效。方法和结果:纳入了在ESC-EHRA EORP AF(欧洲心脏病学会-欧洲心律协会欧洲观察性研究计划心房颤动)一般长期登记中接受地高辛或β受体阻滞剂治疗的心房颤动患者。研究的结果包括全因死亡率、心血管死亡率、非心血管死亡率、生活质量和计划外住院患者的数量。6377例患者中,549例(8.6%)接受地高辛治疗。在24个月内,有550例(8.6%)全因死亡事件和1304例(23.6%)意外急诊住院。与受体阻滞剂相比,地高辛治疗增加了全因死亡率[危险比(HR) 1.90(95%可信区间,CI, 1.48-2.44)]、CV死亡率[HR 2.18 (95% CI 1.47-3.21)]和非CV死亡率[HR 1.68 (95% CI 1.02-2.75)],并降低了生活质量[健康效用评分0.555(±0.406)比0.705(±0.346),P。地高辛与受体阻滞剂治疗相比,在死亡率过高和生活质量下降方面,使用地高辛的不良结果与其他危险因素的存在有关,而不是地高辛本身。地高辛或受体阻滞剂治疗的选择对意外住院的发生率没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信