24-Month Clinical Performance of a Universal Adhesive on Non-Carious Cervical Lesions: Self-Etch and Etch-and-Rinse Techniques.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Joana Cruz, Ana Luisa Silva, Raquel Eira, Catarina Coito, Bernardo Romão Sousa, Maria Manuela Lopes, Alexandre Cavalheiro
{"title":"24-Month Clinical Performance of a Universal Adhesive on Non-Carious Cervical Lesions: Self-Etch and Etch-and-Rinse Techniques.","authors":"Joana Cruz,&nbsp;Ana Luisa Silva,&nbsp;Raquel Eira,&nbsp;Catarina Coito,&nbsp;Bernardo Romão Sousa,&nbsp;Maria Manuela Lopes,&nbsp;Alexandre Cavalheiro","doi":"10.3290/j.jad.b2000173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the 24-month clinical performance of Adhese Universal (ADH) (Ivoclar Vivadent) using two different application modes (etch-and-rinse vs self-etch) when restoring non-carious cervical lesions.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty-six patients participated in this study. A total of 117 non-carious cervical lesion restorations (N = 117) were assigned to two groups: 1) ADH in the etch-and-rinse mode (n = 59) and 2) ADH in the self-etch mode (n = 58). The same resin composite (Tetric EvoCeram, Ivoclar Vivadent) was used for all restorations. The restorations were evaluated at baseline and at 24 months using the World Dental Federation (FDI) criteria. The results were analyzed statistically using the McNemar test (α = 0.05) and a generalized estimating equation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In self-etch mode, significant differences were found for marginal coloring (p = 0.002), marginal adaptation (p = 0.031), and hypersensitivity (p = 0.031) between baseline and the end of the 24-month period. In the etch-and-rinse mode, significant differences were found for marginal coloring (p = 0.004), fractures/retention (p = 0.002), marginal adaptation (p = 0.002), and hypersensitivity (p = 0.000). Significant differences were also detected between groups at 24 months for fractures/retention (p = 0.001). At 24 months, 10 restorations of the etch-and-rinse group were lost and 2 restorations of the self-etch group were lost.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In terms of fractures and retention criteria, this universal adhesive obtained better results when applied in self-etch mode than in etch-and-rinse mode.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":"23 5","pages":"379-387"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.b2000173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the 24-month clinical performance of Adhese Universal (ADH) (Ivoclar Vivadent) using two different application modes (etch-and-rinse vs self-etch) when restoring non-carious cervical lesions.

Materials and methods: Twenty-six patients participated in this study. A total of 117 non-carious cervical lesion restorations (N = 117) were assigned to two groups: 1) ADH in the etch-and-rinse mode (n = 59) and 2) ADH in the self-etch mode (n = 58). The same resin composite (Tetric EvoCeram, Ivoclar Vivadent) was used for all restorations. The restorations were evaluated at baseline and at 24 months using the World Dental Federation (FDI) criteria. The results were analyzed statistically using the McNemar test (α = 0.05) and a generalized estimating equation.

Results: In self-etch mode, significant differences were found for marginal coloring (p = 0.002), marginal adaptation (p = 0.031), and hypersensitivity (p = 0.031) between baseline and the end of the 24-month period. In the etch-and-rinse mode, significant differences were found for marginal coloring (p = 0.004), fractures/retention (p = 0.002), marginal adaptation (p = 0.002), and hypersensitivity (p = 0.000). Significant differences were also detected between groups at 24 months for fractures/retention (p = 0.001). At 24 months, 10 restorations of the etch-and-rinse group were lost and 2 restorations of the self-etch group were lost.

Conclusion: In terms of fractures and retention criteria, this universal adhesive obtained better results when applied in self-etch mode than in etch-and-rinse mode.

一种通用黏合剂治疗宫颈非龋齿病变的24个月临床表现:自蚀刻和蚀刻-冲洗技术。
目的:评价Adhese Universal (ADH) (Ivoclar Vivadent)采用两种不同的应用模式(蚀刻冲洗与自蚀刻)修复宫颈非龋齿病变24个月的临床表现。材料与方法:26例患者参与本研究。117例非龋齿宫颈病变修复体(N = 117)分为两组:1)蚀刻冲洗模式ADH (N = 59)和2)自蚀刻模式ADH (N = 58)。所有修复体均使用相同的树脂复合材料(Tetric EvoCeram, Ivoclar Vivadent)。根据世界牙科联合会(FDI)的标准在基线和24个月时对修复体进行评估。采用McNemar检验(α = 0.05)和广义估计方程对结果进行统计学分析。结果:在自蚀刻模式下,在基线和24个月结束时,边缘着色(p = 0.002)、边缘适应(p = 0.031)和超敏(p = 0.031)方面存在显著差异。在蚀刻-冲洗模式下,在边缘着色(p = 0.004)、骨折/固位(p = 0.002)、边缘适应(p = 0.002)和超敏(p = 0.000)方面发现了显著差异。两组在24个月时骨折/潴留的发生率也有显著差异(p = 0.001)。24个月时,蚀刻冲洗组丢失10个修复体,自蚀刻组丢失2个修复体。结论:就骨折和固位标准而言,该通用胶粘剂在自蚀刻模式下比在蚀刻-冲洗模式下应用效果更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信