Management of patients explanted for implantable cardioverter defibrillator infections: Bridge therapy with external temporary ICD.

IF 1.3
Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE Pub Date : 2021-11-01 Epub Date: 2021-09-17 DOI:10.1111/pace.14355
Gabriele Dell'Era, Eleonora Prenna, Matteo Ziacchi, Igor Diemberger, Marco Varalda, Federico Guerra, Mauro Biffi, Eraldo Occhetta, Giuseppe Patti
{"title":"Management of patients explanted for implantable cardioverter defibrillator infections: Bridge therapy with external temporary ICD.","authors":"Gabriele Dell'Era,&nbsp;Eleonora Prenna,&nbsp;Matteo Ziacchi,&nbsp;Igor Diemberger,&nbsp;Marco Varalda,&nbsp;Federico Guerra,&nbsp;Mauro Biffi,&nbsp;Eraldo Occhetta,&nbsp;Giuseppe Patti","doi":"10.1111/pace.14355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims and methods: </strong>In case of cardiacimplantable electronicdevice (CIED)-related infections, it is mandatory to completely remove the device and administer prolonged antibiotic therapy. The management of patients explanted for an implantable defibrillator (ICD) infection is complex especially in patients needing anti-bradycardia pacing or tachyarrhythmia protection. We tested the efficacy and safety of a conventional ICD externally connected to a transvenous dual-coil lead as bridging therapy before the reimplant, comparing outcomes with a historical cohort of patients (N = 113) treated with temporary transvenous pacing. We enrolled 18 patients explanted for ICD infection and needing prolonged antibiotic therapy in three high-volume Italian centers. They received an external ICD stand-by for a mean of 16.5 (4-30) days before the reimplant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No patient experienced malfunction of the system, with a significant reduction of this complication versus temporary transfemoral pacing (37%, p = .004). Post-procedural occurrence of other complications (infection, relevant local bleeding, ventricular tachycardia during insertion of the lead, cardiac perforation, and venous thromboembolism) was low and not different in the two groups. One patient experienced an electrical storm, effectively recognized by the external ICD and treated with anti-tachycardia pacings (ATPs) and shocks.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An approach with an external ICD seems to be a safe and viable option as bridging therapy in patients requiring ICD explant for CIED infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":520740,"journal":{"name":"Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE","volume":" ","pages":"1884-1889"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/pace.14355","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.14355","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/9/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Aims and methods: In case of cardiacimplantable electronicdevice (CIED)-related infections, it is mandatory to completely remove the device and administer prolonged antibiotic therapy. The management of patients explanted for an implantable defibrillator (ICD) infection is complex especially in patients needing anti-bradycardia pacing or tachyarrhythmia protection. We tested the efficacy and safety of a conventional ICD externally connected to a transvenous dual-coil lead as bridging therapy before the reimplant, comparing outcomes with a historical cohort of patients (N = 113) treated with temporary transvenous pacing. We enrolled 18 patients explanted for ICD infection and needing prolonged antibiotic therapy in three high-volume Italian centers. They received an external ICD stand-by for a mean of 16.5 (4-30) days before the reimplant.

Results: No patient experienced malfunction of the system, with a significant reduction of this complication versus temporary transfemoral pacing (37%, p = .004). Post-procedural occurrence of other complications (infection, relevant local bleeding, ventricular tachycardia during insertion of the lead, cardiac perforation, and venous thromboembolism) was low and not different in the two groups. One patient experienced an electrical storm, effectively recognized by the external ICD and treated with anti-tachycardia pacings (ATPs) and shocks.

Conclusions: An approach with an external ICD seems to be a safe and viable option as bridging therapy in patients requiring ICD explant for CIED infection.

植入式心律转复除颤器感染患者的处理:外部临时ICD的桥接治疗。
目的和方法:在心脏植入式电子设备(CIED)相关感染的情况下,必须完全移除设备并进行长期抗生素治疗。植入式除颤器(ICD)感染患者的处理是复杂的,特别是需要抗心动过缓起搏或心律失常保护的患者。我们测试了传统ICD体外连接经静脉双线圈导线作为再植入前桥接治疗的有效性和安全性,并将结果与采用临时经静脉起搏的历史队列患者(N = 113)进行了比较。我们在意大利的三个大容量中心招募了18名因ICD感染而需要长期抗生素治疗的患者。他们在重新种植前平均接受了16.5(4-30)天的体外ICD备用。结果:没有患者出现系统故障,与临时经股动脉起搏相比,该并发症显著减少(37%,p = 0.004)。术后其他并发症(感染、相关局部出血、插入导线时室性心动过速、心脏穿孔和静脉血栓栓塞)的发生率较低,两组无差异。一名患者经历了电风暴,被外部ICD有效识别,并接受了抗心动过速起搏(atp)和电击治疗。结论:对于需要ICD外植体治疗CIED感染的患者,外部ICD似乎是一种安全可行的桥接治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信