Estimation of body surface area in neonates, infants, and children using body weight alone

Q2 Medicine
Ranaa Akkawi El Edelbi , Synnöve Lindemalm , Per Nydert , Staffan Eksborg
{"title":"Estimation of body surface area in neonates, infants, and children using body weight alone","authors":"Ranaa Akkawi El Edelbi ,&nbsp;Synnöve Lindemalm ,&nbsp;Per Nydert ,&nbsp;Staffan Eksborg","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpam.2020.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The aim of this study was to use Body Surface Area (BSA) data calculated with the Mosteller equation to test potential new equations that estimate BSA using Body Weight (BW) alone in children aged 0–18 years.</p><p>Mosteller’s equation, the golden standard at our hospital, was used to calculate the BSA in infants and children aged 0–18 years using BW and height data from 27,440 hospital visits by 20,635 patients over one year.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The best fit of three nonlinear regression equations (third-order polynomial, Meeh-type, and modified Boyd self-adjusting-type) to a plot of the calculated Mosteller BSA values versus BW was then investigated. The correlation between the BSA values estimated by these equations and the Mosteller BSA values was established by the Spearman rank correlation test. Bias and precision were evaluated as outlined by Sheiner and Beal. Measured and estimated BSA values were compared using the Eksborg plot.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The estimated BSA values from all three equations and the BSA values from the Mosteller equation were closely correlated (<em>P</em> &lt; .0001). The third-order polynomial and Meeh-type equations overestimated BSA by 0.13% and 0.40%, respectively, while the Boyd self-adjusted-type equation underestimated BSA by 0.060%. For the entire pediatric population, the best fit was obtained with the Meeh-type equation: 99.2% of the Meeh/Mosteller BSA ratios were within the range of 0.9–1.1 when compared with 98.3% and 97.2% for the polynomial and Boyd-type equations, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>A single Meeh-type equation can be used to predict the results of Mosteller equation when H is not available with high precision and accuracy in children aged 0–18 years, including term neonates. We now plan to include the results of this study in CPOE systems in Sweden to improve drug dosage in all children.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36646,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine","volume":"8 4","pages":"Pages 221-228"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ijpam.2020.09.003","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235264672030079X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to use Body Surface Area (BSA) data calculated with the Mosteller equation to test potential new equations that estimate BSA using Body Weight (BW) alone in children aged 0–18 years.

Mosteller’s equation, the golden standard at our hospital, was used to calculate the BSA in infants and children aged 0–18 years using BW and height data from 27,440 hospital visits by 20,635 patients over one year.

Methods

The best fit of three nonlinear regression equations (third-order polynomial, Meeh-type, and modified Boyd self-adjusting-type) to a plot of the calculated Mosteller BSA values versus BW was then investigated. The correlation between the BSA values estimated by these equations and the Mosteller BSA values was established by the Spearman rank correlation test. Bias and precision were evaluated as outlined by Sheiner and Beal. Measured and estimated BSA values were compared using the Eksborg plot.

Results

The estimated BSA values from all three equations and the BSA values from the Mosteller equation were closely correlated (P < .0001). The third-order polynomial and Meeh-type equations overestimated BSA by 0.13% and 0.40%, respectively, while the Boyd self-adjusted-type equation underestimated BSA by 0.060%. For the entire pediatric population, the best fit was obtained with the Meeh-type equation: 99.2% of the Meeh/Mosteller BSA ratios were within the range of 0.9–1.1 when compared with 98.3% and 97.2% for the polynomial and Boyd-type equations, respectively.

Conclusion

A single Meeh-type equation can be used to predict the results of Mosteller equation when H is not available with high precision and accuracy in children aged 0–18 years, including term neonates. We now plan to include the results of this study in CPOE systems in Sweden to improve drug dosage in all children.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

仅用体重估计新生儿、婴儿和儿童的体表面积
本研究的目的是使用Mosteller方程计算的体表面积(BSA)数据来测试0-18岁儿童单独使用体重(BW)估计BSA的潜在新方程。本文采用我院的黄金标准Mosteller’s方程,利用20,635例患者一年内27,440次就诊的体重和身高数据,计算0-18岁婴幼儿的BSA。方法采用三阶多项式、meeh型和改进的Boyd自调整型三种非线性回归方程,对计算的Mosteller BSA值与体重曲线进行拟合。通过Spearman秩相关检验,建立了这些方程估计的BSA值与Mosteller BSA值之间的相关性。偏差和精度的评估由Sheiner和Beal概述。用Eksborg图比较测量值和估计值。结果3个方程的估计BSA值与Mosteller方程的估计BSA值密切相关(P <。)。三阶多项式方程和meeh型方程分别高估了0.13%和0.40%,而Boyd自调整型方程低估了0.060%。对于整个儿科人群,Meeh型方程拟合最佳:99.2%的Meeh/Mosteller BSA比值在0.9-1.1范围内,而多项式和boyd型方程分别为98.3%和97.2%。结论在0 ~ 18岁儿童(包括足月新生儿)无H时,可采用单一meeh型方程预测Mosteller方程结果,精度和准确性较高。我们现在计划将这项研究的结果纳入瑞典的CPOE系统,以改善所有儿童的药物剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine
International Journal of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信