Facilitators and Barriers of a Chronic Care Management Intervention Addressing Diabetes Among Mexican-Origin Adults.

Valerie L Polletta, Alana M W LeBrón, Maribel R Sifuentes, Lisa A Mitchell-Bennett, Ciara Ayala, Belinda M Reininger
{"title":"Facilitators and Barriers of a Chronic Care Management Intervention Addressing Diabetes Among Mexican-Origin Adults.","authors":"Valerie L Polletta,&nbsp;Alana M W LeBrón,&nbsp;Maribel R Sifuentes,&nbsp;Lisa A Mitchell-Bennett,&nbsp;Ciara Ayala,&nbsp;Belinda M Reininger","doi":"10.1177/10901981211014431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic care management (CCM) and community health worker (CHW) interventions hold promise for managing complex chronic conditions such as diabetes and related comorbidities. This qualitative study examines facilitators and barriers to the implementation of an expanded CCM intervention that explicitly incorporated program staff, clinic staff, CHWs, and partnerships with community-based organizations to enhance diabetes management among Mexican-origin adults.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Grounded theory was used to analyze interviews conducted in 2018 with 24 members of the CCM team, including program staff, clinic staff, and community-based program partner staff.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three themes emerged that characterize perceived facilitators and barriers to CCM implementation, based on analysis of interviews: (1) understanding roles and responsibilities across organizations, (2) building relationships across organizations, and (3) coordinating delivery of the model among different organizations. First, structured meetings and colocated workspaces enhanced understanding of CCM roles for each team member and across organizations. Barriers to understanding CCM roles were more common during the early stages of CCM implementation and amongst staff who did not participate in regular meetings. Second, regular meetings facilitated development of relationships across organizations to enhance implementation of the CCM model. In contrast, limited relationship building among some CCM team members served as a barrier to implementation. Third, CHWs and case review meetings fostered communication and coordination across the CCM model.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results suggest the importance of understanding roles and building relationships among multidisciplinary teams to ensure effective communication and coordination of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":520637,"journal":{"name":"Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education","volume":" ","pages":"831-841"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/10901981211014431","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10901981211014431","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/5/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Chronic care management (CCM) and community health worker (CHW) interventions hold promise for managing complex chronic conditions such as diabetes and related comorbidities. This qualitative study examines facilitators and barriers to the implementation of an expanded CCM intervention that explicitly incorporated program staff, clinic staff, CHWs, and partnerships with community-based organizations to enhance diabetes management among Mexican-origin adults.

Method: Grounded theory was used to analyze interviews conducted in 2018 with 24 members of the CCM team, including program staff, clinic staff, and community-based program partner staff.

Results: Three themes emerged that characterize perceived facilitators and barriers to CCM implementation, based on analysis of interviews: (1) understanding roles and responsibilities across organizations, (2) building relationships across organizations, and (3) coordinating delivery of the model among different organizations. First, structured meetings and colocated workspaces enhanced understanding of CCM roles for each team member and across organizations. Barriers to understanding CCM roles were more common during the early stages of CCM implementation and amongst staff who did not participate in regular meetings. Second, regular meetings facilitated development of relationships across organizations to enhance implementation of the CCM model. In contrast, limited relationship building among some CCM team members served as a barrier to implementation. Third, CHWs and case review meetings fostered communication and coordination across the CCM model.

Conclusions: Results suggest the importance of understanding roles and building relationships among multidisciplinary teams to ensure effective communication and coordination of care.

墨西哥裔成人糖尿病慢性护理管理干预的促进因素和障碍。
背景:慢性护理管理(CCM)和社区卫生工作者(CHW)干预措施有望管理复杂的慢性疾病,如糖尿病和相关合并症。本定性研究考察了扩大CCM干预措施实施的促进因素和障碍,该干预措施明确纳入了项目人员、诊所人员、卫生工作者以及与社区组织的合作关系,以加强墨西哥裔成年人的糖尿病管理。方法:运用扎根理论分析2018年对24名CCM团队成员的访谈,包括项目工作人员、诊所工作人员和社区项目合作伙伴工作人员。结果:基于访谈分析,出现了三个主题,描述了CCM实施的感知促进因素和障碍:(1)理解跨组织的角色和责任,(2)建立跨组织的关系,(3)在不同组织之间协调模型的交付。首先,结构化的会议和协同工作空间增强了对每个团队成员和跨组织的CCM角色的理解。理解CCM角色的障碍在CCM实施的早期阶段和没有参加定期会议的工作人员中更为常见。第二,定期会议促进了跨组织关系的发展,以加强CCM模型的实施。相比之下,一些CCM团队成员之间有限的关系建立成为实施CCM的障碍。第三,卫生保健中心和病例审查会议促进了整个CCM模式的沟通和协调。结论:研究结果提示多学科团队之间的角色理解和关系的建立对于确保有效的沟通和协调至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信