Reproducibility: Reliability and Agreement Parameters of the Revised Short McGill Pain Questionnaire Version-2 for use in Patients with Musculoskeletal Shoulder Pain.

IF 2 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Samuel U Jumbo, Joy C MacDermid, Tara L Packham, George S Athwal, Kenneth J Faber
{"title":"Reproducibility: Reliability and Agreement Parameters of the Revised Short McGill Pain Questionnaire Version-2 for use in Patients with Musculoskeletal Shoulder Pain.","authors":"Samuel U Jumbo,&nbsp;Joy C MacDermid,&nbsp;Tara L Packham,&nbsp;George S Athwal,&nbsp;Kenneth J Faber","doi":"10.1080/24740527.2020.1712653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: The Revised Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire Version-2 (SF-MPQ-2) is a multidimensional outcome measure designed to evaluate neuropathic and nonneuropathic pain. A recent systematic review found insufficient psychometric data with respect to musculoskeletal health conditions. <b>Aims</b>: The aim of this study was to describe the reproducibility (reliability and agreement) and internal consistency of the SF-MPQ-2 for use among patients with musculoskeletal shoulder pain. <b>Methods</b>: Eligible patients with shoulder pain from musculoskeletal (MSK) sources completed the SF-MPQ-2 at baseline (<i>n</i> = 195), and a subset did so again after 3 to 7 days (<i>n</i> = 48) if their response to the global rating of change scale remained unchanged. Cronbach's alpha (α) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC[2,1]) were calculated. Standard error of measurement (SEM), group and individual minimal detectable change (MDC90), and Bland-Altman plots were used to assess agreement. <b>Results</b>: Cronbach's α ranged from 0.83 to 0.95, suggesting very satisfactory internal consistency across the SF-MPQ-2 domains. Excellent ICC(2,1) scores were found in support of the total (0.95) and continuous (0.92) subscales; the remaining subscales displayed good ICC(2,1) scores (0.78-0.88). Bland-Altman analysis revealed no systematic bias between the test and retest scores (mean difference = 0.13 to 0.19). Though the best agreement coefficients were seen on the total scale (SEM = 0.5; MDC90 = 1.2, MDC90<sub>group</sub> = 0.3), they were acceptable for the SF-MPQ-2 subscales (SEM: range, 0.7-1; MDC90: range, 1.7-2.3; MDC90<sub>group</sub>: range, 0.4-0.5). <b>Conclusions</b>: The SF-MPQ-2 provides good to excellent test-retest reliability for multidimensional pain assessment among patients with musculoskeletal shoulder pain conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":53214,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Pain-Revue Canadienne de la Douleur","volume":"4 4","pages":"45-46"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/24740527.2020.1712653","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Pain-Revue Canadienne de la Douleur","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24740527.2020.1712653","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: The Revised Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire Version-2 (SF-MPQ-2) is a multidimensional outcome measure designed to evaluate neuropathic and nonneuropathic pain. A recent systematic review found insufficient psychometric data with respect to musculoskeletal health conditions. Aims: The aim of this study was to describe the reproducibility (reliability and agreement) and internal consistency of the SF-MPQ-2 for use among patients with musculoskeletal shoulder pain. Methods: Eligible patients with shoulder pain from musculoskeletal (MSK) sources completed the SF-MPQ-2 at baseline (n = 195), and a subset did so again after 3 to 7 days (n = 48) if their response to the global rating of change scale remained unchanged. Cronbach's alpha (α) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC[2,1]) were calculated. Standard error of measurement (SEM), group and individual minimal detectable change (MDC90), and Bland-Altman plots were used to assess agreement. Results: Cronbach's α ranged from 0.83 to 0.95, suggesting very satisfactory internal consistency across the SF-MPQ-2 domains. Excellent ICC(2,1) scores were found in support of the total (0.95) and continuous (0.92) subscales; the remaining subscales displayed good ICC(2,1) scores (0.78-0.88). Bland-Altman analysis revealed no systematic bias between the test and retest scores (mean difference = 0.13 to 0.19). Though the best agreement coefficients were seen on the total scale (SEM = 0.5; MDC90 = 1.2, MDC90group = 0.3), they were acceptable for the SF-MPQ-2 subscales (SEM: range, 0.7-1; MDC90: range, 1.7-2.3; MDC90group: range, 0.4-0.5). Conclusions: The SF-MPQ-2 provides good to excellent test-retest reliability for multidimensional pain assessment among patients with musculoskeletal shoulder pain conditions.

可重复性:用于肌肉骨骼肩痛患者的修订短McGill疼痛问卷第2版的可靠性和一致性参数。
背景:修订短格式McGill疼痛问卷第2版(SF-MPQ-2)是一种多维结果测量,旨在评估神经性和非神经性疼痛。最近的一项系统综述发现,关于肌肉骨骼健康状况的心理测量数据不足。目的:本研究的目的是描述SF-MPQ-2用于肌肉骨骼性肩痛患者的可重复性(可靠性和一致性)和内部一致性。方法:符合条件的肌肉骨骼(MSK)来源肩痛患者在基线时完成SF-MPQ-2 (n = 195),如果他们对总体变化量表评分的反应保持不变,则一部分患者在3至7天后再次完成SF-MPQ-2 (n = 48)。计算Cronbach’s α (α)和类内相关系数(ICC[2,1])。测量标准误差(SEM)、组和个体最小可检测变化(MDC90)和Bland-Altman图用于评估一致性。结果:Cronbach's α范围为0.83至0.95,表明SF-MPQ-2结构域的内部一致性非常令人满意。优秀的ICC(2,1)分数支持总(0.95)和连续(0.92)子量表;其余分量表显示良好的ICC(2,1)得分(0.78-0.88)。Bland-Altman分析显示测试和重测分数之间没有系统偏差(平均差异= 0.13至0.19)。虽然在总量表上的一致性系数最好(SEM = 0.5;MDC90 = 1.2, MDC90组= 0.3),SF-MPQ-2子量表(SEM:范围0.7-1;MDC90:范围,1.7-2.3;mdc90组:范围,0.4-0.5)。结论:SF-MPQ-2在肩关节肌肉疼痛患者多维度疼痛评估中提供了良好的重测信度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信