Women in surgery: a web-based survey on career strategies and career satisfaction.

IF 1.7 Q2 SURGERY
Innovative Surgical Sciences Pub Date : 2020-02-29 eCollection Date: 2020-03-01 DOI:10.1515/iss-2019-0016
Sonia Radunz, Hülya Pustu, Katja Marx, Laura Mazilescu, Agnes Braun, Tamas Benkö, Mark Banysch, Gernot M Kaiser
{"title":"Women in surgery: a web-based survey on career strategies and career satisfaction.","authors":"Sonia Radunz,&nbsp;Hülya Pustu,&nbsp;Katja Marx,&nbsp;Laura Mazilescu,&nbsp;Agnes Braun,&nbsp;Tamas Benkö,&nbsp;Mark Banysch,&nbsp;Gernot M Kaiser","doi":"10.1515/iss-2019-0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Women represent the majority of medical students in several countries. In any surgical specialty and above all in surgical leadership positions, women still remain disproportionally underrepresented. The objective of this study was to investigate female surgeons' career advancement and satisfaction with training. A standardized questionnaire was devised and sent out via the web-based survey tool SurveyMonkey<sup>®</sup> to female surgeons in the German federal state of North Rhine-Westphalia. A total of 125 completed questionnaires were analyzed (response rate 40.8%). Female surgeons are at least largely (76%) satisfied with their surgical training. Increased time (>5 h/week) as the principal surgeon in the operating room significantly stimulates the satisfaction with the surgical training (86% vs. 68%, p = 0.0384). At the participants' current workplace, the heads of departments are predominantly male surgeons (91%). Respondents not satisfied with their surgical training prefer a female head of department more frequently (24% vs. 2%, p = 0.0085). The majority of the respondents themselves aspire to become a consultant surgeon (56%), while only 12% intend to become a head of a department. Female surgeons aiming at leadership positions work overtime (≥50 h/week) significantly more frequently (81% vs. 57%, p = 0.0041). Favoritism of male colleagues is perceived by 34%. Respondents who do not perceive any preferential treatment are significantly more satisfied with their surgical training (88% vs. 57%, p = 0.0004). In conclusion, female surgeons seem positive about their career choice, once in the surgical profession, and aptly fill upcoming positions. Women interested in surgery are likely to pursue a surgical career despite the alleged workload, demonstrating the importance of professional self-fulfillment among female surgeons.</p>","PeriodicalId":44186,"journal":{"name":"Innovative Surgical Sciences","volume":"5 1-2","pages":"11-19"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/iss-2019-0016","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovative Surgical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/iss-2019-0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Women represent the majority of medical students in several countries. In any surgical specialty and above all in surgical leadership positions, women still remain disproportionally underrepresented. The objective of this study was to investigate female surgeons' career advancement and satisfaction with training. A standardized questionnaire was devised and sent out via the web-based survey tool SurveyMonkey® to female surgeons in the German federal state of North Rhine-Westphalia. A total of 125 completed questionnaires were analyzed (response rate 40.8%). Female surgeons are at least largely (76%) satisfied with their surgical training. Increased time (>5 h/week) as the principal surgeon in the operating room significantly stimulates the satisfaction with the surgical training (86% vs. 68%, p = 0.0384). At the participants' current workplace, the heads of departments are predominantly male surgeons (91%). Respondents not satisfied with their surgical training prefer a female head of department more frequently (24% vs. 2%, p = 0.0085). The majority of the respondents themselves aspire to become a consultant surgeon (56%), while only 12% intend to become a head of a department. Female surgeons aiming at leadership positions work overtime (≥50 h/week) significantly more frequently (81% vs. 57%, p = 0.0041). Favoritism of male colleagues is perceived by 34%. Respondents who do not perceive any preferential treatment are significantly more satisfied with their surgical training (88% vs. 57%, p = 0.0004). In conclusion, female surgeons seem positive about their career choice, once in the surgical profession, and aptly fill upcoming positions. Women interested in surgery are likely to pursue a surgical career despite the alleged workload, demonstrating the importance of professional self-fulfillment among female surgeons.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

外科女性:一项基于网络的职业策略和职业满意度调查。
在一些国家,妇女占医学生的大多数。在任何外科专科,尤其是在外科领导职位上,妇女仍然不成比例地代表性不足。本研究旨在探讨女外科医师的职业发展及对培训的满意度。设计了一份标准化问卷,并通过基于网络的调查工具SurveyMonkey®向德国北莱茵-威斯特伐利亚联邦州的女外科医生发送。共分析问卷125份,回复率40.8%。女外科医生至少在很大程度上(76%)对她们的手术培训感到满意。增加主刀医师在手术室的时间(>5小时/周)显著提高了手术培训的满意度(86% vs. 68%, p = 0.0384)。在参与者目前的工作场所,部门主管主要是男性外科医生(91%)。对外科培训不满意的受访者更倾向于选择女性科室主任(24%比2%,p = 0.0085)。大多数受访者自己希望成为外科顾问医生(56%),而只有12%的受访者希望成为科室主任。以领导职位为目标的女外科医生加班频率(≥50小时/周)显著高于女性外科医生(81% vs. 57%, p = 0.0041)。34%的人认为男性同事偏袒。没有感觉到任何优待的受访者对手术培训的满意度明显更高(88%对57%,p = 0.0004)。总之,女性外科医生似乎对自己的职业选择持积极态度,一旦进入外科专业,就能恰当地填补即将到来的职位。对外科感兴趣的女性可能会继续从事外科工作,尽管工作量很大,这表明了女性外科医生职业自我实现的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信