Picturing Participation: Catalyzing Conversations About Community Engagement in HIV Community-Based Organizations.

Sarah Switzer, Soo Chan Carusone, Alex McClelland, Kamilah Apong, Neil Herelle, Adrian Guta, Carol Strike, Sarah Flicker
{"title":"Picturing Participation: Catalyzing Conversations About Community Engagement in HIV Community-Based Organizations.","authors":"Sarah Switzer,&nbsp;Soo Chan Carusone,&nbsp;Alex McClelland,&nbsp;Kamilah Apong,&nbsp;Neil Herelle,&nbsp;Adrian Guta,&nbsp;Carol Strike,&nbsp;Sarah Flicker","doi":"10.1177/1090198120977145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Community engagement is considered a cornerstone of health promotion practice. Yet engagement is a fuzzy term signifying a range of practices. Health scholarship has focused primarily on individual effects of engagement. To understand the complexities of engagement, organizations must also consider relational, structural, and/or organizational factors that inform stakeholders' subjective understandings and experiences. Community engagement processes are not neutral; they can reproduce and/or dismantle power structures, often in contradictory or unexpected ways. This article discusses diverse stakeholders' subjective experiences and understandings of engagement within the HIV sector in Toronto, Canada. In our study, a team of community members, service providers, and academics partnered with three HIV community-based organizations to do this work. We used photovoice, a participatory and action-oriented photography method, to identify, document, and analyze participants' understandings at respective sites. Through collaborative analysis, we identified seven themes that may catalyze conversations about engagement within organizations: reflecting on journey; honoring relationships; accessibility and support mechanisms; advocacy, peer leadership, and social justice; diversity and difference; navigating grief and loss; and nonparticipation. Having frank and transparent discussions that are grounded in stakeholders' subjective experiences, and the sociopolitical and structural conditions of involvement, can help organizations take a more intersectional and nuanced approach to community engagement. Together, our findings can be used as a framework to support organizations in thinking more deeply and complexly about how to meaningfully, ethically, and sustainably engage communities (both individually and collectively) in HIV programming, and organizational policy change. The article concludes with questions for practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":520637,"journal":{"name":"Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education","volume":" ","pages":"769-782"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1090198120977145","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198120977145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Community engagement is considered a cornerstone of health promotion practice. Yet engagement is a fuzzy term signifying a range of practices. Health scholarship has focused primarily on individual effects of engagement. To understand the complexities of engagement, organizations must also consider relational, structural, and/or organizational factors that inform stakeholders' subjective understandings and experiences. Community engagement processes are not neutral; they can reproduce and/or dismantle power structures, often in contradictory or unexpected ways. This article discusses diverse stakeholders' subjective experiences and understandings of engagement within the HIV sector in Toronto, Canada. In our study, a team of community members, service providers, and academics partnered with three HIV community-based organizations to do this work. We used photovoice, a participatory and action-oriented photography method, to identify, document, and analyze participants' understandings at respective sites. Through collaborative analysis, we identified seven themes that may catalyze conversations about engagement within organizations: reflecting on journey; honoring relationships; accessibility and support mechanisms; advocacy, peer leadership, and social justice; diversity and difference; navigating grief and loss; and nonparticipation. Having frank and transparent discussions that are grounded in stakeholders' subjective experiences, and the sociopolitical and structural conditions of involvement, can help organizations take a more intersectional and nuanced approach to community engagement. Together, our findings can be used as a framework to support organizations in thinking more deeply and complexly about how to meaningfully, ethically, and sustainably engage communities (both individually and collectively) in HIV programming, and organizational policy change. The article concludes with questions for practice.

描绘参与:促进社区参与艾滋病毒社区组织的对话。
社区参与被认为是健康促进实践的基石。然而,参与是一个模糊的术语,指的是一系列的实践。健康方面的学术研究主要集中在参与的个人影响上。为了理解参与的复杂性,组织还必须考虑关系、结构和/或组织因素,这些因素告知涉众的主观理解和经验。社区参与过程并非中立;他们可以复制和/或拆除权力结构,往往以矛盾或意想不到的方式。本文讨论了不同的利益相关者的主观经验和参与在加拿大多伦多艾滋病部门的理解。在我们的研究中,一个由社区成员、服务提供者和学者组成的团队与三个以艾滋病毒为基础的组织合作开展了这项工作。我们使用了photovoice,一种参与性和行动导向的摄影方法,来识别、记录和分析参与者在各自地点的理解。通过合作分析,我们确定了七个可能促进组织内部参与对话的主题:反思旅程;尊敬的关系;无障碍和支持机制;倡导、同侪领导和社会正义;多样性和差异;克服悲伤和失落;和不参与。基于利益相关者的主观经验,以及参与的社会政治和结构条件,进行坦率和透明的讨论,可以帮助组织采取更具交叉性和细致入微的方法来进行社区参与。总之,我们的研究结果可以作为一个框架,支持组织更深入、更复杂地思考如何有意义地、合乎道德地、可持续地让社区(个人和集体)参与艾滋病毒规划和组织政策变革。文章最后提出了一些可供实践的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信