[Future perspectives of mumps vaccine].

Uirusu Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.2222/jsv.68.125
Minoru Kidokoro
{"title":"[Future perspectives of mumps vaccine].","authors":"Minoru Kidokoro","doi":"10.2222/jsv.68.125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Because of the concerns about aseptic meningitis due to Japanese domestic mumps vaccine strains, the routine mumps immunization program has not yet been introduced in Japan, and it resulted in the situation where the major mumps epidemics occur every 4-5 years. However, the fact that at least 348 mumps hearing loss cases were reported during the recent epidemic period in 2015-2016, argues that the introduction of the routine mumps immunization program is an urgent issue for us. In contrast, 122 countries employ mumps-containing vaccines for nationwide immunization programs by 2018, of which 117 apply 2-dose vaccination regimens, and many of them use Jeryl-Lynn containing measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccines. While in these countries, where mumps seemed to have been controlled, mumps resurgented in the 2000s. Although, the concerns surrounding mumps vaccination are extremely different in Japan and abroad, both of them link to the inherent characteristics of mumps vaccine, in which it is hard to balance the safety and the efficacy. In order to promptly introduce the routine mumps immunization program in Japan, Japanese domestic mumps vaccine strains need to be re-evaluated based on the latest evidence. Furthermore, from a long-range viewpoint, a novel mumps vaccine should be developed, which combines the safety and the efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":75275,"journal":{"name":"Uirusu","volume":"68 2","pages":"125-136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Uirusu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2222/jsv.68.125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Because of the concerns about aseptic meningitis due to Japanese domestic mumps vaccine strains, the routine mumps immunization program has not yet been introduced in Japan, and it resulted in the situation where the major mumps epidemics occur every 4-5 years. However, the fact that at least 348 mumps hearing loss cases were reported during the recent epidemic period in 2015-2016, argues that the introduction of the routine mumps immunization program is an urgent issue for us. In contrast, 122 countries employ mumps-containing vaccines for nationwide immunization programs by 2018, of which 117 apply 2-dose vaccination regimens, and many of them use Jeryl-Lynn containing measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccines. While in these countries, where mumps seemed to have been controlled, mumps resurgented in the 2000s. Although, the concerns surrounding mumps vaccination are extremely different in Japan and abroad, both of them link to the inherent characteristics of mumps vaccine, in which it is hard to balance the safety and the efficacy. In order to promptly introduce the routine mumps immunization program in Japan, Japanese domestic mumps vaccine strains need to be re-evaluated based on the latest evidence. Furthermore, from a long-range viewpoint, a novel mumps vaccine should be developed, which combines the safety and the efficacy.

[腮腺炎疫苗的未来展望]。
由于对日本国内流行性腮腺炎疫苗株引起的无菌性脑膜炎的担忧,日本尚未引入常规的流行性腮腺炎免疫规划,这导致了每4-5年发生一次主要流行性腮腺炎的情况。然而,在2015-2016年最近的流行期间,至少报告了348例腮腺炎听力损失病例,这一事实表明,引入常规腮腺炎免疫规划对我们来说是一个紧迫的问题。相比之下,到2018年,122个国家在全国免疫规划中采用含腮腺炎疫苗,其中117个国家采用两剂疫苗接种方案,其中许多国家使用含有麻疹-腮腺炎-风疹(MMR)的杰里尔-林恩(Jeryl-Lynn)疫苗。虽然在这些国家,腮腺炎似乎已经得到控制,但在2000年代,腮腺炎又死灰复燃。尽管日本和国外对腮腺炎疫苗接种的担忧有很大不同,但都与腮腺炎疫苗的固有特性有关,难以平衡疫苗的安全性和有效性。为了在日本及时引入常规腮腺炎免疫规划,需要根据最新证据对日本国内腮腺炎疫苗株进行重新评估。此外,从长远的角度来看,应该开发一种安全性和有效性相结合的新型腮腺炎疫苗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信