Intramuscular progesterone versus 8% Crinone vaginal gel for luteal phase support following blastocyst cryopreserved single embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort study.

Fertility research and practice Pub Date : 2020-07-01 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s40738-020-00079-y
Jennifer B Bakkensen, Catherine Racowsky, Ann M Thomas, Andrea Lanes, Mark D Hornstein
{"title":"Intramuscular progesterone versus 8% Crinone vaginal gel for luteal phase support following blastocyst cryopreserved single embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Jennifer B Bakkensen,&nbsp;Catherine Racowsky,&nbsp;Ann M Thomas,&nbsp;Andrea Lanes,&nbsp;Mark D Hornstein","doi":"10.1186/s40738-020-00079-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal route of progesterone administration for luteal support in cryopreserved embryo transfer (CET) has been the subject of much debate. While most published research has pertained to day 3 transfers, recent data on blastocyst CET has suggested that intramuscular progesterone (IMP) is superior to twice daily vaginal Endometrin suppositories for luteal phase support, resulting in significantly higher ongoing pregnancy rates. This study aimed to determine whether IMP is similarly superior to 8% Crinone vaginal gel for luteal phase support following blastocyst CET.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Autologous and donor oocyte blastocyst cryopreserved single embryo transfer (SET) cycles from January 2014-January 2019 utilizing either 50 mg IMP daily or 90 mg 8% Crinone gel twice daily for luteal support were included. The primary outcome was live birth. Secondary outcomes included biochemical pregnancy, spontaneous abortion, and clinical pregnancy. All analyses were adjusted a priori for oocyte age. Log-binomial regression analysis was performed with differences in outcomes reported as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1710 cycles were included, of which 1594 utilized IMP and 116 utilized 8% Crinone gel. Demographic and cycles characteristics were similar between the two groups. Compared to cycles utilizing IMP, cycles utilizing Crinone gel resulted in similar rates of live birth (RR 0.91; 95% CI 0.73-1.13), biochemical pregnancy (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.65-1.92), spontaneous abortion (RR 1.41, 95% CI 0.90-2.20), and clinical pregnancy (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.86-1.17).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to cryopreserved blastocyst SET cycles utilizing IMP for luteal support, cycles utilizing 8% Crinone gel resulted in similar likelihood of live birth.</p>","PeriodicalId":87254,"journal":{"name":"Fertility research and practice","volume":"6 ","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40738-020-00079-y","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fertility research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40738-020-00079-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The optimal route of progesterone administration for luteal support in cryopreserved embryo transfer (CET) has been the subject of much debate. While most published research has pertained to day 3 transfers, recent data on blastocyst CET has suggested that intramuscular progesterone (IMP) is superior to twice daily vaginal Endometrin suppositories for luteal phase support, resulting in significantly higher ongoing pregnancy rates. This study aimed to determine whether IMP is similarly superior to 8% Crinone vaginal gel for luteal phase support following blastocyst CET.

Methods: Autologous and donor oocyte blastocyst cryopreserved single embryo transfer (SET) cycles from January 2014-January 2019 utilizing either 50 mg IMP daily or 90 mg 8% Crinone gel twice daily for luteal support were included. The primary outcome was live birth. Secondary outcomes included biochemical pregnancy, spontaneous abortion, and clinical pregnancy. All analyses were adjusted a priori for oocyte age. Log-binomial regression analysis was performed with differences in outcomes reported as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results: A total of 1710 cycles were included, of which 1594 utilized IMP and 116 utilized 8% Crinone gel. Demographic and cycles characteristics were similar between the two groups. Compared to cycles utilizing IMP, cycles utilizing Crinone gel resulted in similar rates of live birth (RR 0.91; 95% CI 0.73-1.13), biochemical pregnancy (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.65-1.92), spontaneous abortion (RR 1.41, 95% CI 0.90-2.20), and clinical pregnancy (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.86-1.17).

Conclusions: Compared to cryopreserved blastocyst SET cycles utilizing IMP for luteal support, cycles utilizing 8% Crinone gel resulted in similar likelihood of live birth.

肌内黄体酮与8%克瑞诺酮阴道凝胶在囊胚冷冻单胚胎移植后的黄体期支持:一项回顾性队列研究。
背景:在冷冻胚胎移植(CET)中,黄体支持的最佳黄体酮给药途径一直是争论的主题。虽然大多数已发表的研究都与第3天转移有关,但最近关于囊胚CET的数据表明,肌内黄体酮(IMP)优于每天两次阴道子宫内膜栓剂用于黄体期支持,导致持续妊娠率显着提高。本研究旨在确定IMP是否同样优于8%克里诺酮阴道凝胶,用于囊胚CET后的黄体期支持。方法:纳入2014年1月至2019年1月的自体和供体卵母细胞囊胚冷冻单胚胎移植(SET)周期,每天使用50 mg IMP或90 mg 8% criinone凝胶2次,用于黄体支持。主要结局是活产。次要结局包括生化妊娠、自然流产和临床妊娠。所有分析都根据卵母细胞年龄进行了先验调整。采用对数二项回归分析,结果差异报告为相对危险度(RR), 95%置信区间(CI)。结果:共纳入1710个周期,其中IMP 1594个周期,8%克丽诺酮凝胶116个周期。两组的人口统计学和周期特征相似。与使用IMP的周期相比,使用克里诺酮凝胶的周期产生相似的活产率(RR 0.91;95% CI 0.73-1.13)、生化妊娠(RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.65-1.92)、自然流产(RR 1.41, 95% CI 0.90-2.20)和临床妊娠(RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.86-1.17)。结论:与使用IMP作为黄体支持的冷冻保存的囊胚SET周期相比,使用8%克里诺酮凝胶的周期产生活产的可能性相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信