Development of selective criteria for the verification of whiplash-associated disorders.

Q4 Medicine
Grzegorz Teresiński
{"title":"Development of selective criteria for the verification of whiplash-associated disorders.","authors":"Grzegorz Teresiński","doi":"10.5114/amsik.2019.95716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Whiplash injury (distortion of the cervical spine) is the most commonly diagnosed type of injury sustained in car accidents, and it ranks first in the structure of compensation claims for personal injury resulting from traffic incidents. The verification of whiplash-associated disorders (WADs) continues to be a great problem in the formulation of medico- legal expert opinions, as injuries of this type, cannot, by definition, be captured using available imaging methods (\"radiologically negative effects of acceleration/deceleration mechanism with a wide variety of clinical manifestations\"). The present study aims to define a set of criteria that might represent threshold conditions for WAD verification, enabling preliminary cohorting (preselection) of evaluated cases and facilitating the adoption of legal decisions. The available scientific literature addressing problems relating to WAD verification was reviewed to identify factors that differentiate an extremely broad spectrum and varying severity of symptoms depending on the circumstances of incidents, the results of physical evaluation of patients and additional instrumental examinations, as well as technical indicators. Based on the literature search, a range of criteria with the highest potential significance for application in routine medical and forensic expert practice were selected (with a focus on aspects related to verification, quantification and outcomes). The primary prerequisite for recognising the presence of moderate impairment to health (according to the Polish penal code) due to distortion of the cervical spine should involve confirmation of grade 3 WAD according to the Quebec Task Force (QTF) classification, and exceeding the threshold values of Δv (> 15 km/h), acceleration of the victim's vehicle centre of gravity (> 4 g), and NIC criterion (> 15 m2/s2). Additional criteria used by experts should include the verification of the correct head restraint position as well as results of biomechanical examinations evaluating the level of safety of a given vehicle, and epidemiological data retrieved from databases including the statistics for claims filed by victims of real-life accidents.</p>","PeriodicalId":35709,"journal":{"name":"Archiwum Medycyny Sadowej i Kryminologii","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archiwum Medycyny Sadowej i Kryminologii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/amsik.2019.95716","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Whiplash injury (distortion of the cervical spine) is the most commonly diagnosed type of injury sustained in car accidents, and it ranks first in the structure of compensation claims for personal injury resulting from traffic incidents. The verification of whiplash-associated disorders (WADs) continues to be a great problem in the formulation of medico- legal expert opinions, as injuries of this type, cannot, by definition, be captured using available imaging methods ("radiologically negative effects of acceleration/deceleration mechanism with a wide variety of clinical manifestations"). The present study aims to define a set of criteria that might represent threshold conditions for WAD verification, enabling preliminary cohorting (preselection) of evaluated cases and facilitating the adoption of legal decisions. The available scientific literature addressing problems relating to WAD verification was reviewed to identify factors that differentiate an extremely broad spectrum and varying severity of symptoms depending on the circumstances of incidents, the results of physical evaluation of patients and additional instrumental examinations, as well as technical indicators. Based on the literature search, a range of criteria with the highest potential significance for application in routine medical and forensic expert practice were selected (with a focus on aspects related to verification, quantification and outcomes). The primary prerequisite for recognising the presence of moderate impairment to health (according to the Polish penal code) due to distortion of the cervical spine should involve confirmation of grade 3 WAD according to the Quebec Task Force (QTF) classification, and exceeding the threshold values of Δv (> 15 km/h), acceleration of the victim's vehicle centre of gravity (> 4 g), and NIC criterion (> 15 m2/s2). Additional criteria used by experts should include the verification of the correct head restraint position as well as results of biomechanical examinations evaluating the level of safety of a given vehicle, and epidemiological data retrieved from databases including the statistics for claims filed by victims of real-life accidents.

制定验证鞭打相关疾病的选择性标准。
鞭状损伤(颈椎变形)是车祸中最常见的损伤类型,在交通事故人身伤害索赔结构中排名第一。在制定医学-法律专家意见时,核查鞭伤相关疾病仍然是一个大问题,因为根据定义,这种类型的损伤无法使用现有的成像方法("加速/减速机制的放射负面影响,具有各种临床表现")捕捉到。本研究的目的是确定一套可能代表WAD核查的门槛条件的标准,使评估的案件能够初步汇集(预选),并促进通过法律决定。审查了与WAD核查有关问题的现有科学文献,以确定根据事件的情况、对患者的身体评估结果和额外的仪器检查结果以及技术指标区分范围极其广泛和严重程度不同的症状的因素。在文献检索的基础上,选择了一系列在常规医学和法医专家实践中应用最具潜在意义的标准(重点关注与验证、量化和结果相关的方面)。确认因颈椎扭曲造成的中度健康损害(根据波兰刑法)的首要先决条件应包括确认根据魁北克特别工作组(QTF)分类的3级WAD,并超过阈值Δv(> 15公里/小时)、受害者车辆重心加速度(> 4克)和NIC标准(> 15平方米/秒)。专家使用的其他标准应包括验证正确的头枕位置,以及评估特定车辆安全水平的生物力学检查结果,以及从数据库检索的流行病学数据,包括现实事故受害者提出的索赔统计数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Archiwum Medycyny Sądowej i Kryminologii przyjmuje w języku polskim: prace doświadczalne, poglądowe, kazuistyczne, artykuły o charakterze szkoleniowym z medycyny sądowej, kryminologii i dziedzin pokrewnych, opracowania z zakresu etyki i deontologii lekarskiej, streszczenia prac obcych, oceny książek, sprawozdania z działalności PTMSiK, sprawozdania ze zjazdów krajowych i zagranicznych, komunikaty Zarządu Głównego PTMSiK, listy do Redakcji. Autor powinien podać, do jakiej kategorii zalicza tekst nadesłanej pracy. Przyjmowane do druku będą również prace autorów zagranicznych w języku angielskim.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信