Continual Long-Term Physiotherapy After Stroke: A Health Technology Assessment.

Q1 Medicine
Ontario Health Technology Assessment Series Pub Date : 2020-03-06 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01
{"title":"Continual Long-Term Physiotherapy After Stroke: A Health Technology Assessment.","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stroke is a serious health issue in which an interruption in blood flow to any part of the brain damages brain cells. About 83% of people survive with substantial morbidity after their first stroke. We conducted a health technology assessment of continual long-term physiotherapy for people with a diagnosis of stroke, which included an evaluation of effectiveness, safety, cost-effectiveness, the budget impact of publicly funding continual long-term physiotherapy for people with a diagnosis of stroke, and patient preferences and values.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic literature search of the clinical evidence. We also performed a systematic literature search of the economic evidence. We did not conduct a primary economic evaluation because there was insufficient clinical evidence. We also analyzed the budget impact of publicly funding continual long-term physiotherapy after stroke in Ontario. To contextualize the potential value of continual long-term physiotherapy after stroke, we spoke with people who had been diagnosed with stroke, as well as their caregivers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We did not find any published studies that met the specific clinical inclusion criteria. We did not identify any studies that compared the cost-effectiveness of continual long-term versus short-term physiotherapy after stroke. The budget impact of publicly funding continual long-term physiotherapy after stroke in Ontario over the next 5 years ranges from $445,000 in year 1 at an uptake rate of 8% to $888,000 in year 5 at an uptake rate of 16%. The people who had been diagnosed with stroke with whom we spoke reported that they had benefitted from continual long-term physiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We did not identify studies that addressed the specific research question. Based on the clinical evidence review, we are unable to determine the benefits of continual long-term compared with short-term physiotherapy after stroke. The cost-effectiveness of continual long-term physiotherapy after stroke in Ontario is unknown. We estimate that publicly funding continual long-term physiotherapy after stroke in Ontario would result in additional costs of between $445,000 and $888,000 annually over the next 5 years. Patients and caregivers who we spoke with felt that patients who have experienced a stroke should be able to continue with physiotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":39160,"journal":{"name":"Ontario Health Technology Assessment Series","volume":"20 7","pages":"1-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7077936/pdf/ohtas-20-1.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ontario Health Technology Assessment Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Stroke is a serious health issue in which an interruption in blood flow to any part of the brain damages brain cells. About 83% of people survive with substantial morbidity after their first stroke. We conducted a health technology assessment of continual long-term physiotherapy for people with a diagnosis of stroke, which included an evaluation of effectiveness, safety, cost-effectiveness, the budget impact of publicly funding continual long-term physiotherapy for people with a diagnosis of stroke, and patient preferences and values.

Methods: We performed a systematic literature search of the clinical evidence. We also performed a systematic literature search of the economic evidence. We did not conduct a primary economic evaluation because there was insufficient clinical evidence. We also analyzed the budget impact of publicly funding continual long-term physiotherapy after stroke in Ontario. To contextualize the potential value of continual long-term physiotherapy after stroke, we spoke with people who had been diagnosed with stroke, as well as their caregivers.

Results: We did not find any published studies that met the specific clinical inclusion criteria. We did not identify any studies that compared the cost-effectiveness of continual long-term versus short-term physiotherapy after stroke. The budget impact of publicly funding continual long-term physiotherapy after stroke in Ontario over the next 5 years ranges from $445,000 in year 1 at an uptake rate of 8% to $888,000 in year 5 at an uptake rate of 16%. The people who had been diagnosed with stroke with whom we spoke reported that they had benefitted from continual long-term physiotherapy.

Conclusions: We did not identify studies that addressed the specific research question. Based on the clinical evidence review, we are unable to determine the benefits of continual long-term compared with short-term physiotherapy after stroke. The cost-effectiveness of continual long-term physiotherapy after stroke in Ontario is unknown. We estimate that publicly funding continual long-term physiotherapy after stroke in Ontario would result in additional costs of between $445,000 and $888,000 annually over the next 5 years. Patients and caregivers who we spoke with felt that patients who have experienced a stroke should be able to continue with physiotherapy.

中风后持续长期物理治疗:一项健康技术评估。
背景:中风是一种严重的健康问题,其中大脑任何部分的血液流动中断会损害脑细胞。大约83%的人在第一次中风后存活下来,但发病率很高。我们对诊断为中风的患者进行了持续长期物理治疗的健康技术评估,包括对有效性、安全性、成本效益、公共资金持续长期物理治疗对中风患者的预算影响以及患者的偏好和价值观的评估。方法:对临床证据进行系统的文献检索。我们还对经济证据进行了系统的文献检索。由于临床证据不足,我们没有进行初步的经济评估。我们还分析了安大略省中风后持续长期物理治疗的公共资助对预算的影响。为了了解中风后持续长期物理治疗的潜在价值,我们与被诊断为中风的人以及他们的护理人员进行了交谈。结果:我们没有发现任何已发表的研究符合特定的临床纳入标准。我们没有发现任何比较中风后持续长期和短期物理治疗的成本-效果的研究。在安大略省,未来5年,公共资助中风后持续长期物理治疗的预算影响范围从第一年的445,000美元(吸收率为8%)到第五年的888,000美元(吸收率为16%)不等。与我们交谈的被诊断为中风的人报告说,他们从持续的长期物理治疗中受益。结论:我们没有找到解决具体研究问题的研究。基于临床证据回顾,我们无法确定卒中后持续长期物理治疗与短期物理治疗的益处。安大略中风后持续长期物理治疗的成本效益尚不清楚。我们估计,在安大略省,公共资助中风后持续的长期物理治疗将在未来5年内导致每年44.5万至88.8万美元的额外费用。与我们交谈的患者和护理人员认为,经历过中风的患者应该能够继续进行物理治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ontario Health Technology Assessment Series
Ontario Health Technology Assessment Series Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信